Getting Connected: Speech and Language Pathologists’ Perceptions of Building Rapport via Telepractice

  • Yusuf Akamoglu
  • Hedda Meadan
  • Jamie N. Pearson
  • Katrina Cummings
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Building rapport with families (parents and children) is recognized as an important feature of effective intervention. In telepractice service delivery, activities and practices that shape speech language pathologists’ (SLPs) rapport with children and families can take different forms of engagement and interaction. Identifying which SLP practices facilitate the establishment and nurturing of rapport is important and may provide keys to successful service delivery via telepractice. In this article, we present results from a qualitative study exploring SLPs’ perceptions of building rapport with the children and families they serve via telepractice and the strategies they use to establish and maintain rapport with them.

Keywords

Telepractice Rapport Speech therapy Disabilities 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the contributions and mentorship of Dr. James Halle at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the Department of Special Education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

We declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Speech-language pathologists providing clinical services via telepractice: Technical report [technical report].  https://doi.org/10.1044/policy.TR2005-00152. Retrieved from American Speech-Language-Hearing Association website: http://www.asha.org/policy/TR2005-00152.htm.
  2. Anderson, K., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R. J., & Layfield, C. (2014). Parents' perspectives on tele-AAC support for families with a new speech generating device: Results from an Australian pilot study. Perspectives on telepractice, 4(2), 39–70.Google Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1993). Emotional labor in service roles: The influence of identity. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cherney, L. R., Kaye, R. C., & Hitch, R. S. (2011). The best of both worlds: Combining synchronous and asynchronous telepractice in the treatment of aphasia. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 21, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Curtiss, S., Pearson, J., Akamoglu, Y., Fisher, K. W., Meyer, L., Snodgrass, M., et al. (2016). Bringing instructional strategies home: Reaching families online. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48, 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Day, S. X., & Schneider, P. L. (2002). Psychotherapy using distance technology: A comparison of face-to-face, video, and audio treatment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(4), 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher children relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freckmann, A., Hines, M., & Lincoln, M. (2017). Clinicians’ perspectives of therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telepractice speech–language pathology sessions. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(3), 287–296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grogan-Johnson, S., Schmidt, A., Schenker, J., Alvares, R., Rowan, L., & Taylor, J. (2013). A comparison of speech sound intervention delivered by telepractice and side-by-side service delivery models. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34, 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill, A., Theodoros, D., Russell, T., & Ward, E. (2009). Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech in adults. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 731–747.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hines, M., Lincoln, M., Ramsden, R., Martinovich, J., & Fairweather, M. (2015). Speech pathologists’ perspectives on transitioning to telepractice: What factors promote acceptance? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 21, 469–473.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I'll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on children motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008). Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third generation activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 1061–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2012). Rapport in distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 167–190.Google Scholar
  18. Nguyen, H. (2007). Rapport building in language instruction: A microanalysis of the multiple resources in teacher talk. Language and Education, 21, 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parette, H. P., Meadan, H., Doubet, S., & Hess, J. (2010). Supporting families of young children with disabilities using technology. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 552–565.Google Scholar
  20. Snodgrass, M. R., Chung, M. Y., Biller, M. F., Appel, K. E., Meadan, H., & Halle, J. W. (2017). Telepractice in speech–language therapy: The use of online technologies for parent training and coaching. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(4), 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sucala, M., Schnur, J. B., Brackman, E. H., Constantino, M. J., & Montgomery, G. H. (2013). Clinicians’ attitudes toward therapeutic alliance in e-therapy. Journal of General Psychology, 140(4), 282–293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tucker, J. K. (2012). Perspectives of speech-language pathologists on the use of telepractice in schools: Quantitative survey results. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 4, 61–72.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yusuf Akamoglu
    • 1
  • Hedda Meadan
    • 2
  • Jamie N. Pearson
    • 3
  • Katrina Cummings
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Special Education and Multiple AbilitiesUniversity of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Special EducationUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  3. 3.Department of Special EducationNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  4. 4.Department of EducationSimpson CollegeIndianolaUSA

Personalised recommendations