Advertisement

Health Education by Peers with Spinal Cord Injury: a Scoping Review

  • Lisa ChaffeyEmail author
  • Christine Bigby
REVIEW ARTICLE

Abstract

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) have greater health challenges than the general population. Health implications can arise from direct spinal nerve damage, secondary conditions, and the increased likelihood of a sedentary lifestyle. Health education is an important aspect of SCI rehabilitation. Peer education is used in both general health education campaigns and those aimed at people with defined illnesses and disabilities. Peers have a unique understanding of the target population, and are a valued contributor to SCI rehabilitation. This scoping review explored the existing evidence about the various types and content of health education programs involving peers, aimed at adults with SCI. The eight studies identified are described using three themes; timing and focus; role of peer educators; and outcomes. Half of these studies included peer education as one component of a broader program, but despite differing approaches all reported positive participant outcomes. Peer education appears to be a promising approach to assist people with SCI to learn about and manage their health, and positively influence their self-efficacy. Further research that isolates the role of the peer educators in programs would be beneficial to determine the unique benefits of this form of health education.

Keywords

Chronic illness Peers Health education Scoping review Spinal cord injury 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Motivation Australia for their insights into peer education. This work was supported by La Trobe Asia; and La Trobe University Institute for Human Security and Social Change.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

Lisa Chaffey declares that she has no conflict of interest. Christine Bigby declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balcazar, F. E., Kelly, E. H., Keys, C. B., & Balfanz-Vertiz, K. (2011). Using peer mentoring to support the rehabilitation of individuals with violently acquired spinal cord injuries. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 42(4), 3.Google Scholar
  3. Barclay, L., McDonald, R., Lentin, P., & Bourke-Taylor, H. (2016). Facilitators and barriers to social and community participation following spinal cord injury. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 63(1), 19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best, K. L., Miller, W. C., Huston, G., Routhier, F., & Eng, J. J. (2016). Pilot study of a peer-led wheelchair training program to improve self-efficacy using a manual wheelchair: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(1), 37–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, P., Skeels, S. E., Keys, C. B., & Rimmer, J. H. (2005). Shake-it-up: Health promotion and capacity building for people with spinal cord injuries and related neurological disabilities. Disability & Rehabilitation, 27(4), 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bühler, A., Thrul, J., Strüber, E., & Orth, B. (2015). Cluster-randomized trial of a German leisure-based alcohol peer education measure. Health Promotion International.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav007.
  7. Burkell, J. A., Wolfe, D. L., Potter, P. J., & Jutai, J. W. (2006). Information needs and information sources of individuals living with spinal cord injury. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 23(4), 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, A. S., & O'Connell, C. (2012). The challenge of spinal cord injury care in the developing world. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 35(1), 3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000043.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callaway, L., Barclay, L., McDonald, R., Farnworth, L., & Casey, J. (2015). Secondary health conditions experienced by people with spinal cord injury within community living: Implications for a National Disability Insurance Scheme. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62(4), 246–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chamberlain, J. D., Meier, S., Mader, L., Von Groote, P. M., & Brinkhof, M. W. (2015). Mortality and longevity after a spinal cord injury: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology, 44(3), 182–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chubon, R. A. (1995). Manual for the life satisfaction survey (1995 revision). Columbia: University of South Carolina, School of Medicine, Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behaviour Science, Rehabilitation Counseling Program.Google Scholar
  12. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. (2008). Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 31(4), 403–479.  https://doi.org/10.1043/1079-0268-31.4.408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faulkner, G., Gorczynski, P., Arbour, K., Letts, L., Wolfe, D., & Ginis, K. A. M. (2010). Messengers and methods of disseminating health information among individuals with spinal cord injury: A scoping review. In T. C. Berkovsky (Ed.), Handbook of spinal cord injuries (pp. 349–374). New York: Nova Science Pubishers.Google Scholar
  14. Frawley, P., & Bigby, C. (2014). “I'm in their shoes”: Experiences of peer educators in sexuality and relationship education. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 39(2), 167–176.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2014.890701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gargaro, J., Warren, C., & Boschen, K. (2013). Perceived barriers and facilitators to community reintegration after spinal cord injury: A critical review of the literature. Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 25(1–2), 101–141.  https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.2013007021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haas, B. M., Price, L., & Freeman, J. A. (2013). Qualitative evaluation of a community peer support service for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 51(4), 295–299.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herth, K. (1991). Development and refinement of an instrument to measure hope. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 5(1), 39–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Howitt Browning, J. (2010). Peer training as a cost-effective tool for SCI management in low-income countries. New Delhi: Paper presented at the International Spinal Cord Society Conference.Google Scholar
  19. Jalovcic, D., & Pentland, W. (2009). Accessing peers' and health care experts' wisdom: A telephone peer support program for women with SCI living in rural and remote areas. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 15(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jensen, M., Molton, I., Groah, S., Campbell, M., Charlifue, S., Chiodo, A., et al. (2012). Secondary health conditions in individuals aging with SCI: Terminology, concepts and analytic approaches. Spinal Cord, 50(5), 373–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jerusalem, M., Schwarzer, R., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195–213). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kachingwe, A., & Cornick, C. (2011). Most significant change/focus group discussions. Peer group training of trainers participants. Monitoring tool : AWUNA-MAF01. Retrieved from https://www.motivation.org.uk. Accessed 26 March 2015.
  23. Klein, L. A., Ritchie, J. E., Nathan, S., & Wutzke, S. (2014). An explanatory model of peer education within a complex medicines information exchange setting. Social Science & Medicine, 111, 101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Latimer-Cheung, A. E., Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. P., Brawley, L. R., Gray, C., Wilson, A. J., Prapavessis, H., et al. (2013). Developing physical activity interventions for adults with spinal cord injury. Part 2: Motivational counseling and peer-mediated interventions for people intending to be active. Rehabilitation Psychology, 58(3), 307–315.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ljungberg, I., Kroll, T., Libin, A., & Gordon, S. (2011). Using peer mentoring for people with spinal cord injury to enhance self-efficacy beliefs and prevent medical complications. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(3/4), 351–358.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03432.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lucke, K. T., Lucke, J. F., & Martinez, H. (2004). Evaluation of a professional and peer telephone intervention with spinal cord injured individuals following rehabilitation in South Texas. Journal of Multicultural Nursing & Health (JMCNH), 10(2), 68–74.Google Scholar
  27. Martin Ginis, K. A., & Latimer, A. E. (2007). The leisure time physical activity questionnaire for people with spinal cord injury. Retrieved from http://sciactioncanada.ca/.
  28. McHorney, C. A., & Ware Jr., J. E. (1995). Construction and validation of an alternate form general mental health scale for the medical outcomes study short-form 36-item health survey. Medical Care, 33(1), 15–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKinstry, C., Brown, T., & Gustafsson, L. (2014). Scoping reviews in occupational therapy: The what, why, and how to. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 61(2), 58–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, J. F., & Powers, M. J. (1988). Development of an instrument to measure hope. Nursing Research, 37(1), 6–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Munce, S. E. P., Webster, F., Fehlings, M. G., Straus, S. E., Jang, E., & Jaglal, S. B. (2014). Perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: A qualitative descriptive study. BMC Neurology, 14(1).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-48.
  33. Njoki, E., Frantz, J., & Mpofu, R. (2007). Health-promotion needs of youth with a spinal cord injury in South Africa. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(6), 465–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peel, N. M., & Warburton, J. (2009). Using senior volunteers as peer educators: What is the evidence of effectiveness in falls prevention? Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(1), 7–11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00320.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Planken, M. J., & Boer, H. (2010). Effects of a 10-minutes peer education protocol to reduce binge drinking among adolescents during holidays. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 54(2), 35.Google Scholar
  36. Poureslami, I., Nimmon, L., Rootman, I., & Fitzgerald, M. J. (2016). Health literacy and chronic disease management: Drawing from expert knowledge to set an agenda. Health Promotion International., 32(4), 643–754.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw003.Google Scholar
  37. Price, P., Stephenson, S., Krantz, L., & Ward, K. (2011). Beyond my front door: The occupational and social participation of adults with spinal cord injury. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 31(2), 81–88.  https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20100521-01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shen, H., Edwards, H., Courtney, M., McDowell, J., & Wu, M. (2012). Peer-led diabetes self-management programme for community-dwelling older people in China: Study protocol for a quasi-experimental design. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(12), 2766–2777.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06059.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Statewide Rehabilitation Clinical Network. (2016). Model of rehabilitation for spinal cord injury in South Australia. Retrieved from http://www.cpsu.asn.au/upload/2016-Info-Updates/UPDATED-SA-Spinal-Cord-Injury-Service-SubAcute-Model-of-Care-30-Nov-2016.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2015.
  40. Sweet, S. N., Noreau, L., Leblond, J., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2016). Peer support need fulfillment among adults with spinal cord injury: Relationships with participation, life satisfaction and individual characteristics. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(6), 558–565.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1049376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tolli, M. (2012). Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention, adolescent pregnancy prevention and sexual health promotion for young people: A systematic review of European studies. Health Education Research, 27(5), 904–913.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Leeuwen, C. M. C., Post, M. W. M., van Asbeck, F. W. A., Bongers-Janssen, H. M. H., van der Woude, L. H. V., de Groot, S., & Lindeman, E. (2012). Life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury during the first five years after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(1), 76–83.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.587089.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Veith, E. M., Sherman, J. E., & Pellino, T. A. (2006). Qualitative analysis of the peer-mentoring relationship among individuals with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51(4), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Webel, A. R., Okonsky, J., Trompeta, J., & Holzemer, W. L. (2010). A systematic review of the effectiveness of peer-based interventions on health-related behaviors in adults. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 247–253.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whalley Hammell, K. (2007). Experience of rehabilitation following spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord, 45(4), 260–274.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102034.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiggins, N. (2012). Popular education for health promotion and community empowerment: A review of the literature. Health Promotion International, 27(3), 356–371.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar046.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams, J. M., Dwyer, M., Verna, M., Zimmermann, M. H., Gandhi, K. K., Galazyn, M., et al. (2010). Evaluation of the CHOICES program of peer-to-peer tobacco education and advocacy. Community Mental Health Journal, 47(3), 243–251.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9310-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Living with Disability Research CentreLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations