The Effects of Contingent Pairing on Establishing Praise as a Reinforcer with Children with Autism
Social stimuli often do not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Reinforcement by social stimuli, such as praise, is required for the maintenance and generalization of a multitude of social behaviors, most notably verbal behaviors maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to extend the literature on conditioning praise as a reinforcer. We identified primary reinforcers for two nonverbal participants with autism (ages 5 and 9): tickles and potato chips. A preliminary reinforcer analysis demonstrated that button-pressing was consistently more frequent in a contingent primary reinforcer condition than in contingent praise and no programmed consequence conditions. Contingent pairing of praise and the primary reinforcer was then administered in 1-min sessions, and responding during praise alone was evaluated before and after pairing sessions each day. In the context of a reversal design with praise probes, pairing resulted in increases in button-pressing in the praise condition relative to the no programmed consequence condition. In addition, 6 consecutive pairing sessions resulted in higher levels of button-pressing with praise than 3 consecutive pairing sessions. Future research should continue refining the procedures for conditioning attention as a reinforcer as well as examine more closely the role of motivating operations in the process.
KeywordsConditioned reinforcement Pairing Praise Reinforcer assessment Social behavior
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was funded by the Simmons College Fund for Research.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of all individual participants included in the study.
- Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1965). Child development: II. Universal stage of infancy. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.). Croton-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan.Google Scholar
- Greer, R. D., Singer-Dudek, J., Longano, J., & Zrinko, M. (2008). The emergence of praise as conditioned reinforcement as a function of observation in preschool and school age children. Revista Mexicana De Psicología, 25, 5–26.Google Scholar
- Holth, P., Vandbakk, M., Finstad, J., Gronnerud, E. M., & Sorensen, J. M. A. (2009). An operant analysis of joint attention and the establishment of conditioned social reinforcers. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10, 143–158.Google Scholar
- Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
- Moher, C. A., Gould, D. D., Hegg, E., & Mahoney, A. M. (2008). Non-generalized and generalized conditioned reinforcers: Establishment and validation. Behavioral Interventions, 23, 13--38.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton Century.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Sundberg, M. L. (2007). Verbal behavior. In J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, & W. L. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 526–547). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar