A Comparison between iPad-Assisted and Teacher-Directed Reading Instruction for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
- 1.9k Downloads
We conducted an alternating treatment research design to investigate the effects of a multicomponent reading comprehension intervention on reading comprehension performance and task refusal behavior of three elementary students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study also sought to investigate the effects of utilizing teacher-directed instruction (TDI) in comparison to iPad® -assisted instruction (IAI) as the primary mode of instructional delivery during reading sessions. The multicomponent intervention during the TDI sessions consisted of teaching text preview strategy (i.e., looking at text and picture, making predictions), identifying the main idea of each paragraph using a graphic organizer, and the use of a token economy system. Whereas IAI treatment sessions consisted of the use of an iPad® application that focused on identifying main idea paired with implementing a token economy system for task completion. Three elementary students identified with ASD participated in this study. Results indicate that the multicomponent intervention implemented during both conditions was associated with improved performance on curriculum-based measure (CBM) probes during TDI and IAI treatments, with an indication that the TDI treatment was more effective in increasing accuracy of responding on CBM probes in comparison to the IAI condition. Findings from this study also indicate that both treatment conditions (TDI and IAI) were associated with a reduction of task refusal for the three participants with fewer occurrences of the challenging behavior during IAI in comparison to TDI treatment.
KeywordsAutism Reading comprehension Task refusal Teacher-directed instruction iPad® -assisted instruction Intervention
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Prior to participation in this study, an informed consent was obtained from each participant’s legal guardian.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest that is directly or indirectly related to the results of this study.
- Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 392–408.Google Scholar
- Flores, M. M., & Ganz, J. B. (2007). Effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching statement inference, use of facts, and analogies to students with developmental disabilities and reading delays. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 244–251. doi: 10.1177/10883576070220040601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Flores, M. M., & Ganz, J. B. (2009). Effects of direct instruction on the reading comprehension of students with autism and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 39.Google Scholar
- Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Goodman, G., & Williams, C. M. (2007). Interventions for increasing the academic engagement of students with autism spectrum disorders in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(6), 53–61.Google Scholar
- Hammond, D. L., Whatley, A. D., Ayres, K. M., & Gast, D. L. (2010). Effectiveness of video modeling to teach iPod use to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(4), 525–538.Google Scholar
- Happe, F. (2005). The weak central coherence account of autism. In F. Volkmar, P. A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., pp. 640–649). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ihnot, C., Mastoff, J., Gavin, J., & Hendrickson, L. (1992). Read naturally. St. Paul: Read Naturally.Google Scholar
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (2004). 20 U. S. C. §1400 et seq. (2004).Google Scholar
- Jacobsen, J. W., Foxx, R. M., & Mulick, J. A. (2005). Controversial Therapies for developmental disabilities. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Kagohara, D., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy, C. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., & Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: an overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lincoln, A. J., Courchesne, E., Harms, L., & Allen, M. (1995). Sensory modulation of auditory stimuli in children with autism and receptive developmental language disorder: event related brain potential evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 521–539. doi: 10.1007/BF02178298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marks, S. U., Shaw-Hegwer, J., Schrader, C., Longaker, T., Peters, I., Poweres, F., & Levine, M. (2003). Instructional management tips for teachers of students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 50–55.Google Scholar
- Mojang (2013). Application: Minecraft (0.8.1). Available from www.mojang.com
- O’Connor, I. M., & Klein, P. D. (2004). Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 115–127. doi: 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022603.44077.6b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reutebuch, C. K., El Zein, F., Kim, M. K., Weinberg, A. N., & Vaughn, S. (2015). Investigating a reading comprehension intervention for high school students with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 96–111.Google Scholar
- Rovio (2013). Application: Angry Birds (4.0.0). Available from www.rovio.com
- Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2012). Reading comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: a synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(4), 327–340. doi: 10.1177/0022219411402691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solis, M., El Zein, F., Vaughn, S., McCulley, L. V., & Falcomata, T. S. (2015). Reading comprehension interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders an alternating treatments comparison. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. doi: 10.1177/1088357615583464.
- Teacher Created Resources (2012). Applications: Space Voyage Grades 2–3; Space Voyage Grades 4–5 (1.0.1). Available from www.teachercreatedresources.com
- van der Meer, L., Didden, R., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 1-18.Google Scholar
- Van Riper, I. (2010). The effects of the Directed Reading-Thinking Activity on reading comprehension skills of middle school students with autism (Doctoral dissertation, Widener University, Chester, PA). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (3414553)Google Scholar
- Whalon, K., & Hanline, M. F. (2008). Effects of a reciprocal questioning intervention on the question generation and responding of children with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 367–387.Google Scholar
- Williamson, P., Carnahan, C., & Jacobs, J. (2009). Increasing comprehension for students with autism: From research to practice. Seattle: Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Conference.Google Scholar