Evaluating Picture Exchange and the iPad™ as a Speech Generating Device to Teach Communication to Young Children with Autism

  • Elizabeth R. Lorah
  • Matt Tincani
  • Jessica Dodge
  • Shawn Gilroy
  • Anna Hickey
  • Donald Hantula
REVIEW ARTICLE

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare picture exchange (PE) and an iPad™ –based speech generating device (SGD) in teaching mands to five preschool boys diagnosed with autism. Participants’ preferences for each device were assessed following training. Three participants met mastery criterion for mands using the SGD more quickly, while two participants met mastery criterion for mands using PE more readily. However, the overall rate of independent manding across training and maintenance was higher for four participants using the SGD. Four participants demonstrated a clear preference for the SGD device and one for PE. Results are consistent with previous research showing that acquisition of alternative communication modalities varies across children with autism, and supports the use of assessment to determine modality preference.

Keywords

Autism Mand Picture exchange Speech generating device Voice output communication aid Augmentative and alternative communication 

References

  1. Beck, A. R., Stoner, J. B., Bock, S. J., & Parton, T. (2008). Comparison of PECS and VOCA: A replication. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 198–216.Google Scholar
  2. Bock, S. J., Stoner, J. B., Beck, A. R., Hanley, L., & Prochnow, J. (2005). Increasingfunctional communication in non-speaking preschool children: Comparison of PECS and VOCA. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 264–278.Google Scholar
  3. Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. A. (2001). The picture exchange communication system. Behavior Modification, 25, 725–744.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charlop-Christy, M., Carpenter, M., Le, L., LeBlanc, L., & Kellet, K. (2002). Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 213–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durand, V. M. (1999). Functional communication training using assistive devices: Recruiting natural communities of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 247–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flores, M., Musgrove, K., Renner, S., Hinton, V., Strozier, S., Franklin, S., et al. (2012). A comparison of communication using the apple iPad and a picture based system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frost, L. A., & Bondy, A. S. (2002). The picture exchange communication system training manual (2nd ed.). Newark: Pyramid Educational Products.Google Scholar
  10. Goldstein, H. (2002). Communication intervention for children with autism: A review of treatment efficacy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 373–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. (2006). Pivotal response treatments for autism: Communication, social, & academic development. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.Google Scholar
  12. Lancioni, G., O’Reilly, M., Curvo, A., Singh, N., Sigafoos, J., & Didden, R. (2007). PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lovaas, O. I. (1981). Teaching developmentally disabled children: The ME book. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  14. Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  15. Maurice, C., Green, G., & Foxx, R. M. (Eds.). (2001). Making a difference: Behavioral intervention for autism. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  16. Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward a functional augmentative and alternative communication for student with autism, manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Learning, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peluso, D. (2012). The fast-paced iPad revolution: Can educators stay up to date and relevant about these ubiquitous devices? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rispoli, M. J., Franco, J. H., Van Der Meer, L., Lang, R., & Camargo, S. (2010). The use of speech generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 276–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Son, S. G., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E. (2006). Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9, 389–395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sigafoos, J., Doss, S., & Reichel, J. (1989). Developing mand and tact repertoires in persons with severe developmental disabilities using graphic symbols. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 183–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sundberg, M. L. (2007). Verbal-Behavior milestones assessment and placement program. Concord: CA. Achievements in Verbal Behavior.Google Scholar
  23. Weitz, C., Dexter, M., & Moore, J. (1997). AAC and children with developmental disabilities. In S. Glennen & D. DeCoste (Eds.), The handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 395–431). San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth R. Lorah
    • 1
  • Matt Tincani
    • 1
  • Jessica Dodge
    • 1
  • Shawn Gilroy
    • 1
  • Anna Hickey
    • 1
  • Donald Hantula
    • 1
  1. 1.Temple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations