The Speech Generating Device (SGD) Mentoring Program: Supporting the Development of People Learning to Use an SGD
Mentoring in speech generating device (SGD) use by adults who use an SGD proficiently offers the potential to improve the device usage of people learning an SGD. The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of SGD mentoring on the mentees’ SGD usage. Three mentors, aged 23, 31, and 54 years, and 3 mentees, aged 13, 14, and 32 years, participated. A nonconcurrent multiple baseline across participants design was used to assess the outcomes. Mentee conversation samples were analyzed for the number of total words, the number of different words, and the number of bound morphemes produced in mentoring sessions. Improvements were made in these measures across the mentees following commencement of mentoring sessions with a trained SGD mentor. These results provide preliminary evidence of SGD mentoring success.
KeywordsAugmentative and alternative communication (AAC) Speech generating device (SGD) Mentor Mentoring Learning Modeling intervention
This research is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia/Cerebral Palsy Foundation co-funded doctoral scholarship and by funds provided by Speech Pathologists, Physiotherapists, and Occupational Therapists on Developmental Disabilities (SPOT on DD) and Speech Pathology Australia. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of these organizations. The authors would like to thank the participants who contributed their time to this research.
- Ballin, L., Balandin, S., & Stancliffe, R. (in press a). The speech generating device (SGD) mentoring program: Training adults who use an SGD to mentor. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication.Google Scholar
- Ballin, L., Balandin, S., & Stancliffe, R. (in press b). The speech generating device mentoring program: An evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Burgstahler, S., & Cronheim, D. (2001). Supporting peer-peer and mentor-protégé relationships on the internet. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 59–74.Google Scholar
- Fey, M. E. (1986). Language intervention with young children. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
- Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Light, J., McNaughton, D., Krezman, C., Williams, M., Gulens, M., Galskoy, A., et al. (2007). The AAC Mentor Project: web-based instruction in sociorelational skills and collaborative problem solving for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(1), 56–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M., & Light, J. (2008). "A child needs to be given a chance to succeed": parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 43–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McReynolds, L., & Kearns, K. (1983). Single-subject experimental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
- Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Prentke Romich Company (2010). PASS Demo Software. Retrieved from http://www.prentrom.com/downloads/pass.
- Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M. B., & D'Silva, K. (2005). "When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff": the challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rhodes, J. E. (1994). Older and wiser: Mentoring relationships in childhood and adolescence. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 14(3), 187–196.Google Scholar
- Rispoli, M., Franco, J. H., van der Meer, L. A. H., Lang, R., & Camargo, S. P. H. (2010). The use of speech generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13(4), 276–293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Cook, S. B., & Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: a quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 260–271.Google Scholar
- Smith, M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136). London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
- Smith, M., & Grove, N. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice. Paul H. Brookes: Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
- von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, M. H. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar