The Effect of Noncontingent Positive Versus Negative Reinforcement on Multiply Controlled Behavior During Discrete Trial Training

  • Mandy Rispoli
  • Jennifer Ganz
  • Leslie Neely
  • Fara Goodwyn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Challenging behaviors with multiple functions are often difficult to treat as function-based treatments may interfere with one another. Noncontingent reinforcement may be one efficient and effective means of treating multiply controlled behavior. The purposes of this study were to compare the use of noncontingent tangible reinforcement (NCT) to noncontingent escape (NCE) with two young children with autism who engaged in multiply controlled challenging behavior. Second, we wished to examine the effect of NCT and NCE on compliance during discrete trial training. A reversal design with an embedded alternating treatment design was used to compare NCT and NCE. The NCT treatment resulted in greater reductions of challenging behavior than the NCE treatment for both participants. Compliance during discrete trial training increased under both NCT and NCE treatments.

Keywords

Challenging behavior Discrete trial training Multiple functions Noncontingent reinforcement 

References

  1. Arick, J., Young, H., Falco, R., Loos, L., Krug, D., Gense, M., & Johnson, S. (2003). Designing an outcome study to monitor the progress of students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(2), 75–87. doi:10.1177/108835760301800201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beavers, G. A., & Iwata, B. A. (2011). Prevalence of multiply controlled problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 593–597. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondy, A. S., & Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9(3), 1–19. doi:10.1177/0145445501255004.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr, J. E., Coriaty, S., Wilder, D. A., Gaunt, B. T., Dozier, C. L., Britton, L. N., & Reed, C. L. (2000). A review of “noncontingent” reinforcement as treatment for the aberrant behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 377–391. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(00)00050-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, C. R., Mayer, G. R., Wright, D. B., Kraemer, B., Wallace, M. D., Dart, E., Collins, T., & Restori, A. (2012). Exploring the link among behavior intervention plans, treatment integrity, and student outcomes under natural educational conditions. Journal of Special Education, 46, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLeon, I. G., Neidert, P. L., Anders, B. M., & Rodriguez-Catter, V. (2001). Choices between positive and negative reinforcement during treatment for escape-maintained behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 521–525. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, W. W., DeLeon, I. G., Rodriguez-Catter, V., & Keeney, K. M. (2004). Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 239–242. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanley, G. P., Piazza, C. C., & Fisher, W. W. (1997). Noncontingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 229–237. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: a review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147–185. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingvarsson, E. T., Kahng, S., & Hausman, N. L. (2008). Some effects of noncontingent positive reinforcement on multiply controlled problem behavior and compliance in a demand context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 435–440. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingvarsson, E. T., Hanley, G. P., & Welter, K. M. (2009). Treatment of escape-maintained behavior with positive reinforcement: the role of reinforcement contingency and density. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 371–401. doi:10.1353/etc.0.0064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197 (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Lalli, J. S., Vollmer, T. R., Progar, P. R., Wright, C., Borrero, J., Daniel, D., & May, W. (1999). Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 285–296. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lomas, J. E., Fisher, W. W., & Kelley, M. E. (2010). The effects of variable-time delivery of food items and praise on problem behavior reinforced by escape. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 425–435. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mildon, R. L., Moore, D. W., & Dixon, R. S. (2004). Combining noncontingent escape and functional communication training as a treatment for negatively reinforced disruptive behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 92–102. Retrieved from: http://www.autismservicesnorth.com/wp-content/uploads/combining-noncontingent-escape-and-functional-communication-training.pdf.Google Scholar
  19. Roane, H. S., Fisher, W. W., & Sgro, G. M. (2001). Effects of a fixed-time schedule on aberrant and adaptive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 333–336. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (2010). Childhood Autism Rating Scale (2nd ed.). Torrence: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  21. Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. (1999). Functional-assessment-based behavior support planning: Research-to-practice-to-research. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 223–227. Retrieved from: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/10198430/functional-assessment-based-behavior-support-planning-research-practice-research.
  22. Vollmer, T. R., Marcus, B. A., & Ringdahl, J. E. (1995). Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 15–26. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilder, D. A., Fisher, W. W., Anders, B. M., Cercone, J. J., & Neidert, P. L. (2001). Operative mechanisms of noncontingent reinforcement at varying magnitudes and schedules. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 117–124. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00061-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mandy Rispoli
    • 1
  • Jennifer Ganz
    • 1
  • Leslie Neely
    • 1
  • Fara Goodwyn
    • 1
  1. 1.Texas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations