The Effect of Noncontingent Positive Versus Negative Reinforcement on Multiply Controlled Behavior During Discrete Trial Training
- 1k Downloads
Challenging behaviors with multiple functions are often difficult to treat as function-based treatments may interfere with one another. Noncontingent reinforcement may be one efficient and effective means of treating multiply controlled behavior. The purposes of this study were to compare the use of noncontingent tangible reinforcement (NCT) to noncontingent escape (NCE) with two young children with autism who engaged in multiply controlled challenging behavior. Second, we wished to examine the effect of NCT and NCE on compliance during discrete trial training. A reversal design with an embedded alternating treatment design was used to compare NCT and NCE. The NCT treatment resulted in greater reductions of challenging behavior than the NCE treatment for both participants. Compliance during discrete trial training increased under both NCT and NCE treatments.
KeywordsChallenging behavior Discrete trial training Multiple functions Noncontingent reinforcement
- Arick, J., Young, H., Falco, R., Loos, L., Krug, D., Gense, M., & Johnson, S. (2003). Designing an outcome study to monitor the progress of students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(2), 75–87. doi:10.1177/108835760301800201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Carr, J. E., Coriaty, S., Wilder, D. A., Gaunt, B. T., Dozier, C. L., Britton, L. N., & Reed, C. L. (2000). A review of “noncontingent” reinforcement as treatment for the aberrant behavior of individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 377–391. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(00)00050-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cook, C. R., Mayer, G. R., Wright, D. B., Kraemer, B., Wallace, M. D., Dart, E., Collins, T., & Restori, A. (2012). Exploring the link among behavior intervention plans, treatment integrity, and student outcomes under natural educational conditions. Journal of Special Education, 46, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fisher, W. W., DeLeon, I. G., Rodriguez-Catter, V., & Keeney, K. M. (2004). Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 239–242. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197 (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
- Lalli, J. S., Vollmer, T. R., Progar, P. R., Wright, C., Borrero, J., Daniel, D., & May, W. (1999). Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 285–296. doi:10.1901/jaba.1999.32-285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mildon, R. L., Moore, D. W., & Dixon, R. S. (2004). Combining noncontingent escape and functional communication training as a treatment for negatively reinforced disruptive behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 92–102. Retrieved from: http://www.autismservicesnorth.com/wp-content/uploads/combining-noncontingent-escape-and-functional-communication-training.pdf.Google Scholar
- Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (2010). Childhood Autism Rating Scale (2nd ed.). Torrence: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., & Sprague, J. (1999). Functional-assessment-based behavior support planning: Research-to-practice-to-research. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 223–227. Retrieved from: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/10198430/functional-assessment-based-behavior-support-planning-research-practice-research.