Skip to main content
Log in

Partners’ Experiences of Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This systematic review of qualitative studies synthesised evidence on the experience chronic pain from the perspective of romantic partners. Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, APA PsycInfo via Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies exploring the impact of chronic pain from partners’ perspectives using qualitative data collection methods were eligible for inclusion. Thematic synthesis was conducted, and confidence in the review findings was assessed using GRADE CERQual criteria. A total of 198 participants were represented from 15 primary studies. Four interconnected analytical themes were developed: ‘life is different’, ‘internal conflict between two worlds’, ‘togetherness vs separateness’, and ‘coping in the longer term’. Out of 27 review findings, 9 were assessed as high confidence, 12 as moderate confidence, 4 as low confidence, and 2 as very low confidence. Socially isolated partners, those in strained relationships, and partners who continually sacrificed their own needs were more likely to experience distressing emotions. Greater recognition of partners’ needs is needed within pain management services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

There is no dataset associated with this review as Copyright is held by publishers of the primary studies.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The library service at Newcastle University assisted with operationalising the search across databases. Kathryn Ragan (Trainee Clinical Psychologist, Newcastle University) contributed to the review by second-screening a random sample (10%) of papers at full-text level. Guidance on conducting a qualitative evidence synthesis was sought from Professor Mark Freeston (School of Psychology, Newcastle University) and Dr Rowan Tinlin (School of Psychology, Newcastle University). Published resources and training videos from the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group were used as guidance for carrying out the review.

Funding

This study was completed in part-fulfilment of a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology degree. There was no grant funding associated with it.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the systematic review’s conception. Searching and screening were conducted by Claire Borthwick. Chris Penlington and Claire Borthwick carried out coding, data analysis, and synthesis. The original draft was written by Claire Borthwick, with supervision, reviewing, and editing from Lucy Robinson and Chris Penlington. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Borthwick.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

Claire Borthwick, Chris Penlington, and Lucy Robinson declared no competing interests.

Ethics Approval

This was a review article. Ethical approval was not required.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent from participants was obtained in the primary studies.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

Human participants provided informed consent to the authors of the primary studies. Animals were not included in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borthwick, C., Penlington, C. & Robinson, L. Partners’ Experiences of Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. J Clin Psychol Med Settings (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-024-10012-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-024-10012-w

Keywords

Navigation