Skip to main content

Ethical Challenges Unique to the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) Model

Abstract

The interprofessional nature of the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model invites potential conflicts between different ethical guidelines and principles developed by separate professional disciplines. When the foundational model of care and training on which ethical principles were developed shifts, the assumptions underlying the guidance also shifts, revealing gaps and mismatches. This article reviews the extant literature in this realm, and proposes a more unifying set of ethical guidance for interprofessional, integrated primary care practice. We discuss common ethical dilemmas unique to the PCBH model through case examples, and then apply the newly proposed ethical guideline model to these cases to illustrate how the newly proposed model can be efficient and effective navigating these dilemmas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Medical Association. (1995–2016). AMA’s code of medical ethics. Retrieved from http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.

  3. American Medical Association Principles of Medical Ethics. (2000). In: Council on ethical and judicial affairs. Code of medical ethics: Current opinions, 2000–2001. xiv th edn, Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  4. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Office of Student Affairs. (2016–2017). Student handbook. Retrieved from http://www.umassmed.edu/studentaffairs/student-handbook/section-nine-student-health-and-wellness/sensitive-medical-and-counseling-care-of-students-by-faculty-and-residents/. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.

  5. Hodgson, J., Mendenhall, T., & Lamson, A. (2013). Patient and provider relationships: Consent, confidentiality, and mistakes in integrated primary care settings. Families, Systems, & Health, 31, 28–40. doi:10.1037/a0031771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivey, L., & Doenges, T. (2013). Resolving the dilemma of multiple relationships for primary care behavioral health providers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44, 218–224. doi:10.1037/a0033149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanzler, K., Goodie, J., Hunter, C., Glotfelter, M., & Bodart, J. (2013). From colleague to patient: Ethical challenges in integrated primary care. Families, Systems, & Health, 31, 41–49. doi:10.1037/a0031853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kinman, C. R., Gilchrist, E. C., Payne-Murphy, J. C., & Miller, B. F. (2015). Provider- and practice-level competencies for integrated behavioral health in primary care: A literature review. Prepared by Westat under Contract No. HHSA 290-2009-00023I. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laabs, C. A. (2007). Primary care nurse practitioners’ integrity when faced with moral conflict. Nursing Ethics, 14, 795–809. doi:10.1177/0969733007082120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nash, J. M., Khatri, P., Cubic, B. A., & Baird, M. A. (2013). Essential competencies for psychologists in patient centered medical homes. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44, 331–342. doi:10.1037/a0033106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nash, J. M., McKay, K., Vogel, M. E., & Masters, K. S. (2012). Functional roles and foundational characteristics of psychologists in integrated primary care. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 19, 93–104. doi:10.1007/s10880-011-9290-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramos, F., Brehmer, L., Vargas, M., Trombetta, A., Silveira, L., & Drago, L. (2015). Ethical conflicts and the process of reflection in undergraduate nursing students in Brazil. Nursing Ethics, 22, 428–439. doi:10.1177/0969733014538890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reiter, J., Dobmeyer, A., & Hunter, C. L. (2017). The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model: An overview and operational definition. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. doi:10.1007/s10880-017-9499-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reiter, J., & Runyan, C. (2013). The ethics of complex relationships in primary care behavioral health. Families, Systems, & Health, 31, 20–27. doi:10.1037/a0031855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson, P. J., & Rickard, J. A. (2013). Ethical quandaries in caring for primary care patients with chronic pain. Families, Systems, & Health, 31, 52–59. doi:10.1037/a0031952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Runyan, C., Robinson, P., & Gould, D. (2013). Ethical issues facing providers in collaborative primary care settings: Do current guidelines suffice to guide the future of team based primary care? Families, Systems, & Health, 31, 1–8. doi:10.1037/a0031895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine N. Runyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Christine N. Runyan, Stephanie Carter-Henry, and Stacy Ogbeide declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

No animal or human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Runyan, C.N., Carter-Henry, S. & Ogbeide, S. Ethical Challenges Unique to the Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) Model. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 25, 224–236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-017-9502-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Primary care behavioral health model
  • Ethical issues in primary care
  • Interprofessional competencies
  • Ethical model