Abstract
This study examined current clinical psychology doctoral students’ interest in gaining prescriptive authority and opinions about potential training options. Three hundred and sixty-three students completed an exploratory survey via electronic mail distributed by the Council of University Directors of Clinical Psychology (CUDCP) listserv. Our results suggest that the majority of these students are at least somewhat interested in gaining prescriptive authority, as well as willing to add three or four graduate-level courses and 6 to 12 months to their internship or post-doctoral positions for psychopharmacology training. Most of the students surveyed felt that training should resemble a medical training model. Implications of these findings are discussed, particularly within the context of the current psychological and medical training models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association. (1996). Recommended postdoctoral training in psychopharmacology for prescription privileges. Washington DC: Author.
Association for Medical School Pharamacology. (1990). Knowledge objectives in medical pharmacology (2nd ed.). Author.
Ax, R. K., Forbes, M. R., & Thompson, D. D. (1997). Prescription privileges for psychologists: A survey of predoctoral interns and directors of training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 509–514.
Bascue, L. O., & Zlotowski, M. (1981). Psychologists’ attitudes about prescribing medications. Psychological Reports, 48, 645–646.
Brentar, J., & McNamara, J. R. (1981). The right to prescribe medication: Considerations for professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 179–187.
California Psychological Association, Professional Education Task Force, California School of Professional Psychology. (1995, January). Report of the Blue Ribbon Panel. Los Angeles: Author.
Chafetz, M. D., & Buelow, G. (1994). A training model for psychologists with prescription privileges: Clinical pharmacologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 149–153.
Council of University Directors of Clinical Psychology. (2001). Report of the CUDCP task force evaluating the effect of level 3 training in prescription privileges upon the scientist-practitioner model. Santa Barbara, CA: Author.
DeLeon, P. H., Fox, R. E., & Graham, S. R. (1991). Prescription privileges: Psychology’s next frontier? American Psychologist, 46, 384–393.
DeLeon, P. H., Sammons, M. T., & Sexton, J. I. (1995). Focusing on society’s real needs: Responsibility and prescription privileges. American Psychologist, 50, 1022–1032.
deMayo, R. A. (2002). Academic interests and experiences of doctoral students in clinical psychology: Implications for prescription privilege training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 499–501.
Fox, R. E., Schwelitz, F. D., & Barclay, A. G. (1992). A proposed curriculum for psychopharmacology training for professional psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and practice, 23, 216–219.
Hayes, S. C., & Heiby, E. (Eds.) (1998). Prescription privileges for psychologists: A critical appraisal. Reno, NV: Context Press.
Hofflich, S. A., Grandin, L. D., Blatt-Eisengart, I., & Creed, T. (2004). Voices of the future: Graduate students’ views on training to prescribe. Clinical Psychologist, 57, 8–13.
Klusman, L. E. (2001). Prescribing psychologists and patients’ medical needs: Lessons from clinical psychiatry. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 496–500.
Kovacs, A. (1988). Shall we take drugs? Just say no. Psychotherapy Bulletin, 23, 8–11.
Levant, R. F., & Shapiro, A. E. (2002). Training psychologists in clinical psychopharmacology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 611–615.
Luscher, K. A., Corbin, W. R., Bernat, J. A., Calhoun, K. S., & McNair, L. D. (2002). Predictors of graduate student attitudes toward prescription privileges for psychologists. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 783–792.
McGrath, R. E., Wiggins, J. G., Sammons, M. T., Levant, R. F., Brown, A., & Stock, W. (2004). Professional issues in pharmacotherapy for psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 158–163.
Pimental, P. A., Stout, C. E., Hoover, M. C., & Kamen, G. B. (1997). Changing psychologists’ opinions about prescription authority: A little information goes a long way. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 123–127.
Sammons, M. T., Gorny, S. W., Zinner, E. S., & Allen, R. P. (2000). Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A consensus report. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 604–609.
Sechrest, L., & Coan, J. A. (2002). Preparing psychologists to prescribe. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 649–658.
Smyer, M. A., Balster, R. L., Egli, D., Johnson, D. L., Kilbey, M. M., Leith, N. J., & Puente, A. E. (1993). Summary of the report of the Ad Hoc Task Force of pharmacology on the American Psychological Association. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 394–403.
Tatman, S. M., Peters, D. B., Greene, A. L., & Bongar, B. (1997). Graduate students’ attitudes toward prescription privileges training. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 515–517.
Walker, K. (2002). An ethical dilemma: Clinical psychologists prescribing psychotropic medications. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 23, 17–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grandin, L.D., Blackmore, M.A. Clinical Psychology Graduate Students’ Opinions about Prescriptive Authority: A Discussion of Medical Versus Psychological Training Models. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 13, 403–410 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-006-9039-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-006-9039-2