Skip to main content
Log in

Health Locus of Control After Lung Transplantation: Implications for Managing Health

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health locus of control (HLC) beliefs may influence the health behaviors that patients perform on their own behalf. Likewise, the HLC beliefs that clinicians consider desirable may influence how active they encourage patients to be in managing health. It remains unclear how involved lung recipients want to be and how involved transplant clinicians believe they should be. The aims of this study were to describe HLC beliefs and behaviors manifested by recipients and clinicians in the setting of lung transplantation. Mixed-methods were used, including quantitative techniques to measure demographics, clinical characteristics, and HLC using the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale (MHLC), and qualitative techniques to explore how HLC beliefs were manifest in the clinical setting. Nearly all participants manifested behaviors consistent with high internality and externality, highlighting the importance of holding ‘dual health locus of control’ beliefs for optimal health management and lending support for recipients and clinicians to share responsibility for managing post-transplant health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. S., Smith, B. J., & Ruffin, R. E. (2000). Factors associated with hospital admissions and repeat emergency department visits for adults with asthma. Thorax, 55, 566–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. L., Arnold, M. S., Funnal, M. M., Fitzgerald, J. T., Butler, P. M., & Feste, C. C. (1995). Patient empowerment: Results of a randomized trial. Diabetes Care, 18(7), 943–949.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, S. M. (2001). Do patients want control over their own health care? a review of measures, findings, and research issues. Journal of Health Psychology, 6(2), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, S. M., Clore, J. N., Kliesler, D. J., Orr, T., Pegg, P. O., Quick, B. G., & Wagner, C. (2002). Relation of diabetic patients' health-related control appraisals and physician-patient interpersonal impacts to patients' metabolic control and satisfaction with treatment. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25(1), 17–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benbassat, J., Pilpel, D., & Tidhar, M. (1998). Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys. Behavioral Medicine, 24(2), 81–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, C. H., Edwards, K. A., Hasenberg, N. M., Laidley, T. L., & Levinson, W. (1999). Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. Journal of American Medical Association, 282, 2313–2320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, B. A., Haffly, D., Foxx, R. M., & Weaver, A. (1995). Patients perceived control over their health care: An outcome assessment of their psychological adjustment to renal failure. American Journal of Medical Quality, 10, 149–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cabello, C. C. (2001). Integration of inpatient and outpatient services in an acute care transplant unit. Progress in Transplantation, 11(1), 23–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cetingok, M., Hathaway, D., & Reed, L. (1997). Perceptual and behavioral manifestations of the chronic illness and recovery models among clinical transplant coordinators. Journal of Transplant Coordination, 7(3), 116–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A. J., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., & Cundick, K. E. (1994). Patient adherence and adjustment in renal dialysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17, 549–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Second edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaun Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vito Dabbs, A. J., Hoffman, L. A., Swigart, V., Happ, M. B., Dauber, J. H., & Iacono, A. (2004a). Striving for normalcy: Symptoms and threat of rejection after lung transplantation. Social Science & Medicine, 59(7), 1473–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vito Dabbs, A. J., Hoffman, L. A., Swigart, V., Happ, M. B., Iacono, A. T., & Dauber, J. H. (2004b). Using conceptual triangulation to develop an integrated model of the symptom experience of acute rejection after lung transplantation. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(2), 138–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. V., & Olbrisch, M. E. (1981). Health perceptions as a function of illness and hospitalization experiences. Los Angeles, CA: Paper presented at the American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger, C., & Kelle, U. (2003). Making inferences in mixed methods: The rules of integration. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 457–488). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, G. L. (1981). The Experience of a Chronic Illness: Values and Health Goals. Washington D.C.: Paper presented at the American Nurse's Association, Council of Nurse Researchers' Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happ, M. B., DeVito Dabbs, A., Tate, J., Hricik, A., & Erlen, J. (2006). Exemplars of mixed methods data combination and analysis. Nursing Research, 55(2S), S43–S49.

  • Happ, M. B., Swigart, V., Tate, J., & Crighton, M. (2004). Event analysis techniques. Advances in Nursing Science, 27, 239–248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1992). Moderators of the relation between perceived control and adjustment to chronic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 656–666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, D. (1989). Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karter, A., & Ferrara, A. (2000). Self-monitoring of blood sugar: Language and financial barriers in a managed care population. Diabetes Care, 23, 477–482.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, R., Chamberlain, K., & Spicer, J. (1994). Self management practices in adult asthmatics. New Zealand Medical Journal, 107, 73–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, B. R., Snyder, M., Sabati, N., Adam, T., Pieczkiewicz, & Finkelstein, S. M. (2002). Health locus of control and adherence with home spirometry use on lung transplant recipients. Progress in Transplantation, 12(1), 24–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (second edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. M. (1993). Trajectory and empowerment theory applied to the care of patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 25, 343–348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 362–376.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OPTN (2004). Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1994–2003. Organ Procurement Transplantation Network.HHS/HRSA/OSP/DOT and UNOSJuly 26, 2005].

  • Prendergast, P. J. (1993). The relationship between self-efficacy, internal health locus of control, and adherence with a therapeutic diabetes regimen. Unpublished Dissertation, Rush University.

  • Rimer, B. K. (1991). Perspectives on intrapersonal theories in health education and health behavior. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison-Whelen, S., & Bodenheimer, C. (2004). Health practices of veterans with unilateral lower-limb loss: identifying correlates. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41(38), 453–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers. Pyschological Methods, 1, 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(609), 534–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzer, E. B., & Saltzer, E. I. (1987). Internal control and health Which comes first? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 9(4), 542–554.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing in Health, 23, 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S., Winsett, R. P., Reed, L., & Hathaway, D. K. (2001). Use of structured self-monitoring in transplant education. Progress in Transplantation, 11(2), 133–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tadmor, C. S., & Hofman, J. E. (1985). Measuring locus of control in a hospital setting. Psychological Reports, 56, 525–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research: Sage.

  • Teichman, B. J., Burker, E. J., Weiner, M., & Egan, T. M. (2000). Factors associated with adherence to treatment regimens after lung transplantation. Progress in Transplantation, 10(2), 113–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trulock, E. P., Edwards, L. B., Taylor, D. O., Boucek, M. M., Keck, B. M., & Hertz, M. I. (2005). Registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: Twenty-Second official adult lung and heart-lung transplant report. 2005. J Heart & Lung Transplantation, 24(8), 956–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, B. S., Wallston K.A., Kaplan G.D., & Maides, S. A. (1976). Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 580–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, K. A. (1992). hocus-pocus, the focus isn't strictly on locus: Rotter's social learning theory modified for health. Cognitive Therapy Research, 16, 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, K. A., Stein, M. J., & Smith, C. A. (1994). Form C of the MHLC scales: A condition-specific measure of locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 534–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, K. A., & Wallston, B. S. (1981). Health locus of control scales. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the Locus of Control Construct Vol 1. Assessment Methods. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, K. A., & Wallston, B. S. (1982). Who is responsible for your health? the construct of health locus of control. In G. S. Sanders & J. Suls (Eds.), Social Psychology of Health and Illness (pp. 65–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., & DeVellis, R. (1980). Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales (MHLC). 385–389.

  • Wallston, K. A., Walltson, B. S., & DeVellis, R. (1978). Development of multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scale. Health Education Monographs, 6, 160–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., Gagne, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21, 40–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C., McGregor, H. A., Zeldman, A., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management. Health Psychology, 23, 58–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfer, K. (1993). Aspects of Reality and ways of knowing in nursing: In search of an integrating paradigm. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P., & Sproule, C. (1984). An attributional analysis of the locus of control construct and the trent attribution profile. In H. Lefocourt (Ed.), Research with the Locus of Control Construct (pp. 309–360). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, A. M. S., Tang, C. S. K., & Kwok, T. C. Y. (2004). Self-efficacy, health locus of control, and psychological distress in elderly chinese women with chronic illnesses. Aging and Mental Health, 8(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annette De Vito Dabbs.

Additional information

Funded by the Nursing & Social Sciences Council of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dabbs, A.D.V., Kim, Y., Hamdan-Mansour, A. et al. Health Locus of Control After Lung Transplantation: Implications for Managing Health. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 13, 378–389 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-006-9038-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-006-9038-3

Keywords

Navigation