Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Women Psychologists within Academic Health Systems: Mentorship and Career Advancement

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women are underrepresented on the faculties and within the senior leadership ranks of academic health systems. Nevertheless, despite the continuing existence of career development challenges related to gender, it is possible for women to thrive professionally in these settings. Mentorship is extremely important, and it is argued that effective mentorship is facilitated by an understanding of both gender differences in social behaviors and the culture of academic health systems. Furthermore, a systems’ level emphasis on faculty diversity and the career development of women faculty is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adel-Wahab, N. (2004). Women and leadership in healthcare [Review of the book Women and Leadership in Healthcare]. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 59, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2004a). Committee on Accreditation: 2003 Annual report. Washington, DC: Author. (Available from APA Office of Program Consultation and Accreditation, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002).

  • American Psychological Association (2004b). 2003 Medical school/Academic medical center psychologists’ employment survey. Washington, DC: Author. (Available from APA Office of Research, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002).

  • American Psychological Association Committee on Women in Psychology. (2004c). 52 resolutions & motions regarding the status of women in psychology: Chronicling 30 years of passion and progress. Washington, DC: Author. (Available from APA Women’s Programs Office, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002).

  • Anderson, L. R., & Blanchard, P. N. (1982). Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 109–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of American Medical Colleges. (2003). Women in U.S. academic medicine statistics, 2002-2003. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Medical School Psychologists. (2005). AMSP Consultation Program. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.apa.org/divisions/div12/sections/section8/index.htm..

  • Bickel, J. (2004). Women in academic psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 28, 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, J., Wara, D., Atkinson, B. F., Cohen, L. W., Dunn, M., Hostler, S. et al. (2002). Increasing women’s leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC project implementation committee. Washington, DC, AAMC.

  • Bondurant, S. (1995). Health care reform continues: Themes for academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 70, 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borus, J. E. (2004). Women and academic psychiatry (a commentary). Academic Psychiatry, 28, 278–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. (1979). Statistically combining independent studies: A meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 131–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1997). Comparing Women and Men: Methods, Findings, and Politics. In Walsh, M. R. (Eds.). Women, Men, & Gender Ongoing Debates (pp. 24–31). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagley, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A Metal-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining Sex Difference in Social Behavior: A Metal-Analytic Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1995). The Science and Politics of Comparing Women and Men. American Psychologist, 50(3), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakins, B. W., & Eakins, A. G. (1978). Sex Differences in Communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, C. L., Sanders, K. M., & Klein, W. S. (2004). Pathways to leadership conference: A professional development resource for women in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 59, 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, P., & Golant, S. K. (1992). Hardball for women: Winning at the game of business. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyl, A. (2000, October). Facilitated mentoring: Means for promoting lifetime learning. Presented at the 111th AAMC Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

  • Hirshbein, L. D., Fitzgerald, K., & Riba, M. (2004). Women and teaching in academic psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 28, 292–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1926). The flight from womanhood. In Kelman, H. (Ed.), Feminine psychology (pp. 54–70). New York: Norton, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper Colophon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B. (1997). Cataloging Gender Differences: Science or Politics? In Walsh, M. R. (Eds.), Women, men, & gender ongoing debates (pp. 19–23). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. A., & Goulden, M. (2004). Do babies matter (Part II): Closing the baby gap. Academe, 90, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElvaine, R. S. (2001). Eve’s seed: Biology, the sexes and the course of history. New York: NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health Lawyers Association and the Academy of Health Care Attorneys. (1997). Patient care and professional responsibility. Impact of the corporate practice of medicine doctrine and related laws and regulations. Washington, DC.: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonnemaker, L. (2000). Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 399–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richman, R. C. (2004). Networking lessons for women professionals—Connecting the dots, building matrices. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 59, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson-Walker, C. (1999). Women and Leadership in Healthcare. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, W. G. (1987). American Medical Schools and the Practice of Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souba, W. W. (2002). Academic medicine and the search for meaning and purpose. Academic Medicine, 77, 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, D. S., & Hall, J. A. (1984). Gender differences in touch: An empirical and theoretical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 440–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swacker, M. (1976). Women’s verbal behavior at learned and professional conferences. In Dubois, B. L., & Crouch, I. (Eds.), The sociology of the languages of American women (pp. 155–160). San Antonio: Trinity University.

  • Tannen, D. (1997). Women and Men Talking: An International Sociolinguistic Approach. In Walsh, M. R. (Eds.), Women, men, & gender ongoing debates (pp. 82–90). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: How Women’s and Men’s Conversation Style Affect Who Gets Heard, Who Gets Credit, and What Gets Done at Work. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Michigan. University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers Mission, Vision and Values. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.med.umich.edu/exec/mission.htm..

  • Vanderbilt Law Review. (1987, March). The corporate practice of medicine doctrine: An anachronism in the modern health care industry (40, No. 2). Author.

  • Yedidia, M. J., & Bickel, J. (2001). Why aren’t there more women leaders in academic medicine? The views of clinical department chairs. Academic Medicine, 76, 453–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. R. (Ed.). (1997). Women, Men, & Gender Ongoing Debates. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2000, Winter). Men receive larger NIH research grants—Why? Women in Medicine Network, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 2, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooley, H. T. (1910). Psychological literature: A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, C.A., Cubic, B. Women Psychologists within Academic Health Systems: Mentorship and Career Advancement. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 12, 271–280 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-005-5746-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-005-5746-3

Key words

Navigation