Abstract
Women are underrepresented on the faculties and within the senior leadership ranks of academic health systems. Nevertheless, despite the continuing existence of career development challenges related to gender, it is possible for women to thrive professionally in these settings. Mentorship is extremely important, and it is argued that effective mentorship is facilitated by an understanding of both gender differences in social behaviors and the culture of academic health systems. Furthermore, a systems’ level emphasis on faculty diversity and the career development of women faculty is recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adel-Wahab, N. (2004). Women and leadership in healthcare [Review of the book Women and Leadership in Healthcare]. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 59, 77.
American Psychological Association. (2004a). Committee on Accreditation: 2003 Annual report. Washington, DC: Author. (Available from APA Office of Program Consultation and Accreditation, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002).
American Psychological Association (2004b). 2003 Medical school/Academic medical center psychologists’ employment survey. Washington, DC: Author. (Available from APA Office of Research, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002).
American Psychological Association Committee on Women in Psychology. (2004c). 52 resolutions & motions regarding the status of women in psychology: Chronicling 30 years of passion and progress. Washington, DC: Author. (Available from APA Women’s Programs Office, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002).
Anderson, L. R., & Blanchard, P. N. (1982). Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 109–139.
Association of American Medical Colleges. (2003). Women in U.S. academic medicine statistics, 2002-2003. Washington, DC: Author.
Association of Medical School Psychologists. (2005). AMSP Consultation Program. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from http://www.apa.org/divisions/div12/sections/section8/index.htm..
Bickel, J. (2004). Women in academic psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 28, 285–291.
Bickel, J., Wara, D., Atkinson, B. F., Cohen, L. W., Dunn, M., Hostler, S. et al. (2002). Increasing women’s leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC project implementation committee. Washington, DC, AAMC.
Bondurant, S. (1995). Health care reform continues: Themes for academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 70, 93–97.
Borus, J. E. (2004). Women and academic psychiatry (a commentary). Academic Psychiatry, 28, 278–281.
Cooper, H. (1979). Statistically combining independent studies: A meta-analysis of sex differences in conformity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 131–146.
Eagly, A. H. (1997). Comparing Women and Men: Methods, Findings, and Politics. In Walsh, M. R. (Eds.). Women, Men, & Gender Ongoing Debates (pp. 24–31). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Eagley, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308.
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A Metal-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685–710.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining Sex Difference in Social Behavior: A Metal-Analytic Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.
Eagly, A. H. (1995). The Science and Politics of Comparing Women and Men. American Psychologist, 50(3), 145–158.
Eakins, B. W., & Eakins, A. G. (1978). Sex Differences in Communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.
Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hampton, C. L., Sanders, K. M., & Klein, W. S. (2004). Pathways to leadership conference: A professional development resource for women in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 59, 82–83.
Heim, P., & Golant, S. K. (1992). Hardball for women: Winning at the game of business. New York: Plume.
Heyl, A. (2000, October). Facilitated mentoring: Means for promoting lifetime learning. Presented at the 111th AAMC Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
Hirshbein, L. D., Fitzgerald, K., & Riba, M. (2004). Women and teaching in academic psychiatry. Academic Psychiatry, 28, 292–298.
Horney, K. (1926). The flight from womanhood. In Kelman, H. (Ed.), Feminine psychology (pp. 54–70). New York: Norton, 1967.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
Lott, B. (1997). Cataloging Gender Differences: Science or Politics? In Walsh, M. R. (Eds.), Women, men, & gender ongoing debates (pp. 19–23). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mason, M. A., & Goulden, M. (2004). Do babies matter (Part II): Closing the baby gap. Academe, 90, 11–17.
McElvaine, R. S. (2001). Eve’s seed: Biology, the sexes and the course of history. New York: NY: McGraw Hill.
National Health Lawyers Association and the Academy of Health Care Attorneys. (1997). Patient care and professional responsibility. Impact of the corporate practice of medicine doctrine and related laws and regulations. Washington, DC.: Author.
Nonnemaker, L. (2000). Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 399–405.
Richman, R. C. (2004). Networking lessons for women professionals—Connecting the dots, building matrices. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 59, 7–9.
Robinson-Walker, C. (1999). Women and Leadership in Healthcare. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Rothstein, W. G. (1987). American Medical Schools and the Practice of Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
Souba, W. W. (2002). Academic medicine and the search for meaning and purpose. Academic Medicine, 77, 139–144.
Stier, D. S., & Hall, J. A. (1984). Gender differences in touch: An empirical and theoretical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 440–459.
Swacker, M. (1976). Women’s verbal behavior at learned and professional conferences. In Dubois, B. L., & Crouch, I. (Eds.), The sociology of the languages of American women (pp. 155–160). San Antonio: Trinity University.
Tannen, D. (1997). Women and Men Talking: An International Sociolinguistic Approach. In Walsh, M. R. (Eds.), Women, men, & gender ongoing debates (pp. 82–90). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: How Women’s and Men’s Conversation Style Affect Who Gets Heard, Who Gets Credit, and What Gets Done at Work. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
University of Michigan. University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers Mission, Vision and Values. Retrieved November 30, 2004, from http://www.med.umich.edu/exec/mission.htm..
Vanderbilt Law Review. (1987, March). The corporate practice of medicine doctrine: An anachronism in the modern health care industry (40, No. 2). Author.
Yedidia, M. J., & Bickel, J. (2001). Why aren’t there more women leaders in academic medicine? The views of clinical department chairs. Academic Medicine, 76, 453–465.
Walsh, M. R. (Ed.). (1997). Women, Men, & Gender Ongoing Debates. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Williams, P. (2000, Winter). Men receive larger NIH research grants—Why? Women in Medicine Network, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 2, 4.
Wooley, H. T. (1910). Psychological literature: A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 335–342.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, C.A., Cubic, B. Women Psychologists within Academic Health Systems: Mentorship and Career Advancement. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 12, 271–280 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-005-5746-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-005-5746-3