Abstract
Despite pessimism in the field, persons experiencing psychosis can benefit from psychotherapy and recover. However, there are multiple factors that can interfere with the formation of a positive therapeutic alliance and lead to the premature termination of therapy, which is associated with poorer long-term outcomes. In this article, common therapist, patient, and intersubjective factors are identified that can inhibit personal growth and lead to stalled treatments. After reviewing these various roadblocks, four principles (e.g., an intersubjective orientation to realty, therapeutic openheartedness/vulnerability, “speaking the unspeakable”, and recognizing the pain beyond the psychosis) are outlined that can embolden the therapist to take judicious risks while avoiding common pitfalls when working with persons experiencing psychosis. These principles also enable the therapist to maintain an empathic connection to the patient and appreciate the pain beyond the psychotic symptom. The clinical implications and challenges of embodying these principles and implementing these interventions are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bjornestad, J., Veseth, M., Davidson, L., Joa, I., Johannessen, J. O., Larsen, T. K., et al. (2018). Psychotherapy in psychosis: Experiences of fully recovered service users. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1675.
Brent, B. K. (2015). A mentalization-based approach to the development of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 146–156.
Britz, B. (2017). Listening and hearing: A voice hearer’s invitation into relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 387.
Buck, K. D., Roe, D., Yanos, P., Buck, B., Fogley, R. L., Grant, M., et al. (2013). Challenges to assisting with the recovery of personal identity and wellness for persons with serious mental illness: Considerations for mental health professionals. Psychosis, 5(2), 134–143.
Charles, M. (2012). Working with trauma: Lessons from Bion and Lacan. Jason Aronson.
Davoine, F., & Gaudillière, J.-M. (2004). History beyond trauma. Other Press.
De Boer, J. N., Brederoo, S. G., Voppel, A. E., & Sommer, I. E. (2020). Anomalies in language as a biomarker for schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 33(3), 212–218.
Etchegoyen, R. H. (1991). The fundamentals of psychoanalytic technique. Karnac.
Federn, P. (1943). Psychoanalysis of the psychosis. In Ego psychology and the psychoses. Basic Books (1952).
Ferro, A. (1993). The impasse within a theory of the analytic field: Possible vertices of observation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74, 917–929.
Fromm-Reichmann, F. (1948). Notes on the development of treatment of schizophrenics by psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 11(3), 263–273.
Galvin, K. T., & Todres, L. (2009). Embodying nursing openheartedness: An existential perspective. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 27(2), 141–149.
Garrett, M., Ahmed, A. O., Athineos, C., Cruz, L., Harris, K., Del Pozzo, J., et al. (2019). Identifying psychological resistances to using logic in cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp) that limit successful outcomes for patients. Psychosis, 11(4), 287–297.
Hamm, J. A., Buck, K. D., Leonhardt, B. L., Luther, L., & Lysaker, P. H. (2018). Self-directed recovery in schizophrenia: Attending to clients’ agendas in psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 28(2), 188–201.
Hamm, J. A., Buck, K. D., Vohs, J., Westerlund, R. J., & Lysaker, P. H. (2016). Interpersonal stance and dialogue in psychotherapy for schizophrenia: A supervisory approach. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(1), 42–62.
Hamm, J. A., Ridenour, J. M., Hillis, J. D., Neal, D. W., & Lysaker, P. H. (2021). Fostering intersubjectivity in the psychotherapy of psychosis: Accepting and challenging fragmentation. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000271
Hasson-Ohayon, I., Gumley, A., McLeod, H., & Lysaker, P. H. (2020). Metacognition and intersubjectivity: Reconsidering their relationship following advances from the study of persons with psychosis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 567–575.
Hasson-Ohayon, I., Kravetz, S., & Lysaker, P. H. (2017). The special challenges of psychotherapy with persons with psychosis: Intersubjective metacognitive model of agreement and shared meaning. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24(2), 428–440.
Humphrey, C., Berry, K., Degnan, A., & Bucci, S. (2022). Childhood interpersonal trauma and paranoia in psychosis: The role of disorganised attachment and negative schema. Schizophrenia Research, 241, 142–148.
Knafo, D. (2020). Alone in a crowded mind: When psychosis masks loneliness. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 37(2), 108–116.
Kreyenbuhl, J., Nossel, I. R., & Dixon, L. B. (2009). Disengagement from mental health treatment among individuals with schizophrenia and strategies for facilitating connections to care: A review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35(4), 696–703.
Leonhardt, B. L., Kukla, M., Belanger, E., Chaudoin-Patzoldt, K. A., Buck, K. D., Minor, K. S., et al. (2018). Emergence of psychotic content in psychotherapy: An exploratory qualitative analysis of content, process, and therapist variables in a single case study. Psychotherapy Research, 28(2), 264–280.
Lincoln, T. M., & Pedersen, A. (2019). An overview of the evidence for psychological interventions for psychosis: Results from meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 1(1), 1–23.
Lysaker, P. H., Gagen, E., Klion, R., Zalzala, A., Vohs, J., Faith, L. A., et al. (2020). Metacognitive reflection and insight therapy: A recovery-oriented treatment approach for psychosis. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 331.
Lysaker, P. H., & Klion, R. E. (2017). Recovery, meaning-making, and severe mental illness: A comprehensive guide to metacognitive reflection and insight therapy. Routledge.
McCabe, R., & Priebe, S. (2008). Communication and psychosis: It’s good to talk, but how? The British Journal of Psychiatry, 192(6), 404–405.
Nabors, L. M., Yanos, P. T., Roe, D., Hasson-Ohayon, I., Leonhardt, B. L., Buck, K. D., & Lysaker, P. H. (2014). Stereotype endorsement, metacognitive capacity, and self-esteem as predictors of stigma resistance in persons with schizophrenia. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(4), 792–798.
Potik, D. (2014). Self psychology conceptualization of postpsychotic depression and recovery among paranoid schizophrenic patients. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 78(1), 70–86.
Ridenour, J. M., Knauss, D., & Neal, D. W. (2021). Promoting an integrating recovery style: A mentalization-informed approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(8), 1786–1797.
Rosenfeld, H. (1987). Impasse and interpretation: Therapeutic and anti-therapeutic factors in the psychoanalytic treatment of psychotic, borderline, and neurotic patients (Vol. 1). Tavistock/Routledge.
Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 3, 43–47.
Sass, L., & Byrom, G. (2015). Phenomenological and neurocognitive perspectives on delusions: A critical overview. World Psychiatry, 14(2), 164–173.
Startup, M., Wilding, N., & Startup, S. (2006). Patient treatment adherence in cognitive behaviour therapy for acute psychosis: The role of recovery style and working alliance. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 34(2), 191–199.
Suchet, M. (2015). Impasse-able. Psychoanalytic Dialogues., 25(4), 405–419.
Tarrier, N. (2008). Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. In D. H. Barlow (Ed.), Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual (4th ed., pp. 463–491). The Guilford Press.
Tillman, J. G. (1999). Psychosis as the sickness unto death: Treatment impasse, consultation, and resolution. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59(2), 119–125.
Will, O. A. (2021). On “caring” in psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 84(1), 2–15.
Funding
There are no funding sources to report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflicts of interests to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ridenour, J.M., Hamm, J.A., Neal, D.W. et al. Navigating an Impasse in the Psychotherapy for Psychosis. J Contemp Psychother 53, 235–243 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-022-09571-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-022-09571-6