Abstract
Under the influence of dialogic and narrative models, relational systemic psychotherapy has shifted its attention towards understanding the relational self, its agency and off-centered nature. In order to substantiate its new clinical positions, it has reached for other disciplines such as philosophy and literature. Francisco Varela’s approach regarding the ontological aporia between the individual and the relationship may provide conceptual foundations to propose a clinical understanding where identity and sense play a key role. By considering intentionality as the engine of everything that’s living, Varela generates a difference between the extensive environment in which individuals unfold, and the singular investiture of significance through which people seek relationships to recognize their identity. A model for a relational psychotherapy of sense is proposed, based in Francisco Varela’s conceptual influences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1996). El experto es el cliente: la ignorancia como enfoque terapéutico [The expert is the client: Ignorance as a therapeutic approach]. In S. McNamee & K. y Gergen (Eds.), La terapia como construcción social [Therapy as a social construction] (pp. 45–59). Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
Bateson, G., & Bateson, M. (1994). El temor de los ángeles [Angels Fear]. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.
Bertrando, P., & Toffanetti, D. (2004). Historia de la Terapia Familiar [History of Family Therapy]. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
Boscolo, L., & Bertrando, P. (1998). Terapia sistémica y lenguaje. Del interés por la organización del sistema a la centralidad del lenguaje [Systemic therapy and language. From interest in the organization of the system to the centrality of language]. Sistemas Familiares, 14(2), 53–62.
Carey, M., Walther, S., & Russell, S. (2009). The absent but implicit: A map to support therapeutic enquiry. Family Process, 48, 319–331.
Cecchin, G. (1987). Hipothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26, 405–413.
Derridá, J. (1989). La Escritura y la Diferencia [Writing and Difference]. Barcelona: Anthropos Editorial.
Goolishian, H., & Winderman, L. (1989). Constructivismo, autopoiesis y sistemas determinados por problemas [Constructivism, autopoiesis and systems determined by problems]. Sistemas Familiares, 5(3), 19–29.
Jonas, H. (1968). Biological foundations of individuality. International Philosophical Quarterly, 8, 231–251.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1984). El árbol del conocimiento [The tree of knowledge]. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Mendez, C., Coddou, F., & Maturana, H. (1988). The bringing forth of pathology. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 144–172.
Miran-Khan, C. (2001). Theorical beacons: Maturana’s theory in clinical practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 66–72.
Pakman, M. (2014). Texturas de la imaginación. Más allá de la ciencia empírica y del giro lingüístico [Textures of the imagination. Beyond empirical science and linguistic shift]. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.
Rober, P. (2005). The therapist’s self in dialogical family therapy: Some ideas about not-knowing and the therapist’s inner conversation. Family Process, 44, 477–495.
Seikkula, J., Laitila, A., & Rober, P. (2012). Making sense of multi-actor dialogues in family therapy and network meetings. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(4), 667–687.
Thompson, E. (2004). Life and mind: From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology. A tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 381–398.
Varela, F. (1992) Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality, In B. McMullin, N. Murphy (Eds.), Autopoiesis & perception (pp. 1–14).
Varela, F. (1996). Ética y acción, [Ethics & Action]. Santiago de Chile: Dolmen Ediciones.
Varela, F. (2000). El Fenómeno de la Vida [The Phenomenon of Life]. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Dolmen.
Varela, F., & Depraz, N. (2000). At the source of time: Valence and the constitutional dynamics of affect. Ipseity and Alterity. Arob@se: Anelectronicjournal.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1993). De Cuerpo Presente. Las ciencias cognitivas y la experiencia humana [The embodied mind]. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa.
Weber, A. (2001). The ‘Surplus of Meaning’. Biosemiotic aspects in Francisco J. Varela’s philosophy of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9(2), 11–29.
Weber, A., & Varela, F. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97–125.
White, M., & Epston, D. (1993). Medios narrativos para fines terapéuticos [Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends]. Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós.
Winslade, J. (2009). Tracing lines of flight: Implications of the work of Gilles Deleuze for narrative practice. Family Process, 48, 332–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zamorano, C., Cuevas, P. & Mera, L. Considerations in Francisco Varela for Psychotherapy of Sense. J Contemp Psychother 48, 225–232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-018-9387-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-018-9387-x