Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Common Mental Health Disorders, What Works, for Whom Under What Circumstances? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (CCBT) as a low intensity intervention for common mental health disorders (CMHD), and investigates some potential moderators of these effects. A meta-analysis was conducted on 49 randomised controlled trials comparing CCBT to other therapies (n = 24) and waiting list controls (n = 25), across the range of CMHD. Results indicated an overall mean effect size of g = 0.77 (95 % CI 0.59–0.95) in favour of the CCBT trial arms. CCBT was found to be significantly more effective than both waitlist and active control conditions. The mean age of study sample and type of control group both significantly moderated this effect. No further measured variables, including guidance were found to moderate this effect. These findings indicate that CCBT can be an effective low-intensity intervention for CMHD and support the implementation of CCBT within the stepped-care context. Limitations of this review, and implications for theory, research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2009). Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(4), 196–205. doi:10.1080/16506070903318960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, G. (2010). Utility of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 196, 257–258. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.076356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008). A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26(2), 109–160. doi:10.1080/15228830802094429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, A., Klein, B., & Proudfoot, J. G. (2009). Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 38(1):4–17. doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9130-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. doi:10.2307/2533446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, K. (2013). Geographic inequity in the availability of cognitive behavioural therapy in England and Wales: A ten-year update. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1–5, (FirstView Article) doi:10.1017/S1352465813000568.

  • Cavanagh, K., & Millings, A. (2012). Increasing engagement with computerised cognitive behavioural therapies. Ambient Systems,. doi:10.4108/trans.amsys.01-06.2013.e3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, I., & Davies, H. (2009). What is meta-analysis?. London: Hayward Medical Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers, P., Donker, T., van Straten, A., Li, J., & Andersson, G. (2010). Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychological Medicine, 40(12), 1943–1957. doi:10.1017/S0033291710000772.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuijpers, P., Marks, I. M., Van Straten, A., Cavanagh, K., Gega, L., & Andersson, G. (2009). Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(2), 66–82. doi:10.1080/16506070802694776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(Pt 3), 665–694. doi:10.1348/000711010X502733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foroushani, P. S., Schneider, J., & Assareh, N. (2011). Meta-review of the effectiveness of computerised CBT in treating depression. BMC Psychiatry, 11(1), 131. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-11-131.

  • Gellatly, J., Bower, P., Hennessy, S., Richards, D., Gilbody, S., & Lovell, K. (2007). What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychological Medicine, 37(9), 1217–1228. doi:10.1017/S0033291707000062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haby, M. M., Donnelly, M., Corry, J., & Vos, T. (2006). Cognitive behavioural therapy for depression, panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-regression of factors that may predict outcome. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 9–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1996). Estimating effect size under publication bias: Small sample properties and robustness of a random effects selection model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(4), 299–332. doi:10.3102/10769986021004299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedman, E., Andersson, E., Ljótsson, B., Andersson, G., Rück, C., & Lindefors, N. (2011). Cost-effectiveness of Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy vs. cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(11), 729–736. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.07.009.

  • Insel, T. R. (2009). Translating scientific opportunity into public health impact: A strategic plan for research on mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 128–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenthaler, E., Brazier, J., De Nigris, E., Tumur, I., Ferriter, M., Beverley, C., Parry, G., et al. (2006). Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety update: A systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 10(33), iii, xi–xiv, 1–168. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16959169.

  • Kaltenthaler, E., Shackly, P., Stevens, K., Beverley, C., Parry, G., & Chilcot, J. (2008a). A systematic review and economic evaluation of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety. Health and Technology Assessment, 6(22), 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenthaler, E., Sutcliffe, P., Parry, G., Beverley, C., Rees, A., & Ferriter, M. (2008b). The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 38(11), 1521–1530. doi:10.1017/S0033291707002607.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., Austen, D., Pier, C., Kiropoulos, L., Shandley, K., Mitchell, J., et al. (2009). Internet-based treatment for panic disorder: Does frequency of therapist contact make a difference? Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(2):100–113. doi:10.1080/16506070802561132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I., & Cavanagh, K. (2009). Computer-aided psychological treatments: Evolving issues. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 121–141. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153538.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., Cavanagh, K., & Gega, L. (2007). Computer-aided psychotherapy: revolution or bubble? The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 471–473. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.041152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. G., Szkodny, L. E., Llera, S. J., & Przeworski, A. (2011). A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: Is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 89–103. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2001). Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. CRD report number 4 (2nd ed.). York: University of York.

  • NICE. (2009). Depression: The treatment and management of depression in adults. NICE clinical guideline 90. London: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence.

  • NICE. (2011). Common mental health disorders. Identification and pathways to care. NICE clinical guidance 123. London: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence.

  • Office for National Statistics. (2002). Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households, 2000: Technical report. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO).

  • Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. (2011). Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (2004). What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafran, R., Clark, D. M., Fairburn, C. G., Arntz, A., Barlow, D. H., Ehlers, A., et al. (2009). Mind the gap: Improving the dissemination of CBT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(11), 902–909. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spek, V., Cuijpers, P., Nyklícek, I., Riper, H., Keyzer, J., & Pop, V. (2007). Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 37(3), 319–328. doi:10.1017/S0033291706008944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Titov, N., Andrews, G., Schwencke, G., Solley, K., Johnston, L., & Robinson, E. (2009). An RCT comparing the effects of two types of support on severity of symptoms for people completing Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for social phobia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 920–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, E., & Williams, R. (1998). The efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 8, 165–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, BN1 9QH, UK

    Rebecca Grist & Kate Cavanagh

Authors
  1. Rebecca Grist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kate Cavanagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Cavanagh.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table 1 (DOCX 41 kb)

Table 2 (DOCX 17 kb)

Table 3 (DOC 79 kb)

Table 4 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grist, R., Cavanagh, K. Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Common Mental Health Disorders, What Works, for Whom Under What Circumstances? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Contemp Psychother 43, 243–251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-013-9243-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-013-9243-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation