Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 243–251 | Cite as

Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Common Mental Health Disorders, What Works, for Whom Under What Circumstances? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Original Paper

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (CCBT) as a low intensity intervention for common mental health disorders (CMHD), and investigates some potential moderators of these effects. A meta-analysis was conducted on 49 randomised controlled trials comparing CCBT to other therapies (n = 24) and waiting list controls (n = 25), across the range of CMHD. Results indicated an overall mean effect size of g = 0.77 (95 % CI 0.59–0.95) in favour of the CCBT trial arms. CCBT was found to be significantly more effective than both waitlist and active control conditions. The mean age of study sample and type of control group both significantly moderated this effect. No further measured variables, including guidance were found to moderate this effect. These findings indicate that CCBT can be an effective low-intensity intervention for CMHD and support the implementation of CCBT within the stepped-care context. Limitations of this review, and implications for theory, research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy Common mental health disorders Anxiety Depression E-mental health 

Supplementary material

10879_2013_9243_MOESM1_ESM.docx (41 kb)
Table 1 (DOCX 41 kb)
10879_2013_9243_MOESM2_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Table 2 (DOCX 17 kb)
10879_2013_9243_MOESM3_ESM.doc (79 kb)
Table 3 (DOC 79 kb)
10879_2013_9243_MOESM4_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Table 4 (DOCX 19 kb)

References

  1. Andersson, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2009). Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(4), 196–205. doi:10.1080/16506070903318960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, G. (2010). Utility of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 196, 257–258. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.109.076356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008). A comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26(2), 109–160. doi:10.1080/15228830802094429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barak, A., Klein, B., & Proudfoot, J. G. (2009). Defining internet-supported therapeutic interventions. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 38(1):4–17. doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9130-7.Google Scholar
  5. Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. doi:10.2307/2533446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavanagh, K. (2013). Geographic inequity in the availability of cognitive behavioural therapy in England and Wales: A ten-year update. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1–5, (FirstView Article) doi:10.1017/S1352465813000568.
  7. Cavanagh, K., & Millings, A. (2012). Increasing engagement with computerised cognitive behavioural therapies. Ambient Systems,. doi:10.4108/trans.amsys.01-06.2013.e3.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crombie, I., & Davies, H. (2009). What is meta-analysis?. London: Hayward Medical Communications.Google Scholar
  10. Cuijpers, P., Donker, T., van Straten, A., Li, J., & Andersson, G. (2010). Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychological Medicine, 40(12), 1943–1957. doi:10.1017/S0033291710000772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuijpers, P., Marks, I. M., Van Straten, A., Cavanagh, K., Gega, L., & Andersson, G. (2009). Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(2), 66–82. doi:10.1080/16506070802694776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010). How to do a meta-analysis. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(Pt 3), 665–694. doi:10.1348/000711010X502733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foroushani, P. S., Schneider, J., & Assareh, N. (2011). Meta-review of the effectiveness of computerised CBT in treating depression. BMC Psychiatry, 11(1), 131. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-11-131.
  14. Gellatly, J., Bower, P., Hennessy, S., Richards, D., Gilbody, S., & Lovell, K. (2007). What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Psychological Medicine, 37(9), 1217–1228. doi:10.1017/S0033291707000062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haby, M. M., Donnelly, M., Corry, J., & Vos, T. (2006). Cognitive behavioural therapy for depression, panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-regression of factors that may predict outcome. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1996). Estimating effect size under publication bias: Small sample properties and robustness of a random effects selection model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(4), 299–332. doi:10.3102/10769986021004299.Google Scholar
  17. Hedman, E., Andersson, E., Ljótsson, B., Andersson, G., Rück, C., & Lindefors, N. (2011). Cost-effectiveness of Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy vs. cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(11), 729–736. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2011.07.009.
  18. Insel, T. R. (2009). Translating scientific opportunity into public health impact: A strategic plan for research on mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66, 128–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaltenthaler, E., Brazier, J., De Nigris, E., Tumur, I., Ferriter, M., Beverley, C., Parry, G., et al. (2006). Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and anxiety update: A systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 10(33), iii, xi–xiv, 1–168. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16959169.
  20. Kaltenthaler, E., Shackly, P., Stevens, K., Beverley, C., Parry, G., & Chilcot, J. (2008a). A systematic review and economic evaluation of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety. Health and Technology Assessment, 6(22), 1–89.Google Scholar
  21. Kaltenthaler, E., Sutcliffe, P., Parry, G., Beverley, C., Rees, A., & Ferriter, M. (2008b). The acceptability to patients of computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 38(11), 1521–1530. doi:10.1017/S0033291707002607.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein, B., Austen, D., Pier, C., Kiropoulos, L., Shandley, K., Mitchell, J., et al. (2009). Internet-based treatment for panic disorder: Does frequency of therapist contact make a difference? Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(2):100–113. doi:10.1080/16506070802561132.Google Scholar
  23. Marks, I., & Cavanagh, K. (2009). Computer-aided psychological treatments: Evolving issues. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 121–141. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marks, I. M., Cavanagh, K., & Gega, L. (2007). Computer-aided psychotherapy: revolution or bubble? The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 471–473. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.041152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newman, M. G., Szkodny, L. E., Llera, S. J., & Przeworski, A. (2011). A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: Is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 89–103. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2001). Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD’s guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews. CRD report number 4 (2nd ed.). York: University of York.Google Scholar
  27. NICE. (2009). Depression: The treatment and management of depression in adults. NICE clinical guideline 90. London: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence.Google Scholar
  28. NICE. (2011). Common mental health disorders. Identification and pathways to care. NICE clinical guidance 123. London: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence.Google Scholar
  29. Office for National Statistics. (2002). Psychiatric morbidity among adults living in private households, 2000: Technical report. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO).Google Scholar
  30. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. (2011). Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (2004). What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Shafran, R., Clark, D. M., Fairburn, C. G., Arntz, A., Barlow, D. H., Ehlers, A., et al. (2009). Mind the gap: Improving the dissemination of CBT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(11), 902–909. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spek, V., Cuijpers, P., Nyklícek, I., Riper, H., Keyzer, J., & Pop, V. (2007). Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 37(3), 319–328. doi:10.1017/S0033291706008944.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Titov, N., Andrews, G., Schwencke, G., Solley, K., Johnston, L., & Robinson, E. (2009). An RCT comparing the effects of two types of support on severity of symptoms for people completing Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for social phobia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 920–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watkins, E., & Williams, R. (1998). The efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 8, 165–187.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of SussexFalmerUK

Personalised recommendations