Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 139–149 | Cite as

A Rationale for Evidence-Based Clinical Supervision

  • Derek MilneEmail author
  • Robert P. Reiser
Original Paper


Although modern mental health systems increasingly require evidence-based practice (EBP), clinicians continue to object to restrictions on their professional independence, which they may perceive as counterproductive, divisive and even demeaning. In the face of such deep-seated objections, do we really need to strive for an evidence-based approach to supervision? We believe so, and begin our argument by noting a colourful illustration of the problems that can exist in the absence of EBP, those of poor training, therapist drift and weak professional regulation. Next, we present EBP as a mechanism to reduce such unacceptable variability in the way that treatments are delivered. We then apply the lessons from this divisive situation to the practice of clinical supervision, outlining a rationale for an inclusive, synergistic way forward. A number of fundamental psychological motives for this integration are noted, including supervisor training that is informed by practice-based research, corrective feedback on supervision, and a supportive professional system. Illustrative examples are provided in each of these areas. It is concluded that the traditional gulf between research and practice can and should be bridged in relation to supervision.


Evidence-based practice (EBP) Clinical supervision 


  1. Ablon, J. S., & Jones, E. E. (2002). Validity of controlled clinical trials of psychotherapy: Findings from the NIMH treatment of depression collaborative research program. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 775–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association (APA). (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology: APA presidential task force on evidence-based practice. American Psychologist, 61, 475–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., & Mellor-Clark, J. (Eds.). (2010a). Developing and delivering practice-based evidence. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., Lambert, M. J., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2010b). Building a rigorous and relevant knowledge-base for the psychological therapies. In M. Barkham, G. E. Hardy, & J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence (pp. 21–61). Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist-practitioner. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  8. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  9. Binder, J. L. (1993). Is it time to improve psychotherapy training? Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackburn, I.-M., James, I. A., Milne, D. L., Baker, C., Standart, S. H., Garland, A., et al. (2001). The Revised Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS-R): Psychometric properties. Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bower, P., & Gilbody, S. (2010). The current view of evidence and evidence-based practice. In M. Barkham, G. E. Hardy, & J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. British Psychological Society. (2009). Register of applied psychology practice supervisors. Leicester: BPS.Google Scholar
  13. Brosan, L., Reynolds, S., & Moore, R. G. (2006). Factors associated with competence in cognitive therapists. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Department of Health. (1994). Research & development in the new NHS. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  15. Department of Health. (2008). Improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT): Commissioning toolkit. London: Author.Google Scholar
  16. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Dyer, K. (2008). Practice guidelines in clinical psychology: An uncertain future for a clinical profession. Clinical Psychology Forum, 190, 17–20.Google Scholar
  18. Elliott, R. (2002). Hermeneutic single-case efficacy design. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellis, M. V., D’luso, N., & Ladany, N. (2008). State of the art in the assessment, measurement, and evaluation of clinical supervision. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, & T. H. Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 473–499). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Falender, C., Cornish, J. A. E., Goodyear, R., Hatcher, R., Kaslow, N. J., Leventhal, G., et al. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 771–785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. (2004). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fouad, N. A., Grus, C. L., Hatcher, R. L., Kaslow, N., Hutchings, P. S., Madson, M. B., et al. (2009). Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competence in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, S5–S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2000). Supervision in the helping professions: An individual group and organizational approach. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, L. W. (1994). The training of psychotherapy supervisors: A barren scape. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 13, 23–42.Google Scholar
  26. Hofmann, S. G., & Weinberger, J. (2007). The art and science of psychotherapy. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Issacs, D., & Fitzgerald, D. (1999). Seven alternatives to evidence-based medicine. British Medical Journal, 319, 1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. James, I. A., Blackburn, I.-M., Milne, D. L., Freeston, M., & Armstrong, P. (2005). Supervision Training and Assessment Rating Scale for Cognitive Therapy (STARS—CT). Unpublished instrument, available from Ian James (; the centre for the health of the elderly, Newcastle General Hospital, England.
  29. Kaslow, N. J., Borden, K. A., Collins, F. L., Forrest, L., Illfelder-Kaye, J., Nelson, P. D., et al. (2004). Competencies conference: Future directions in education and credentialing in professional psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 699–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge-base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kilminster, S. M., & Jolly, B. C. (2000). Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: A literature review. Medical Education, 34, 827–840.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ladany, N., Lehrman-Waterman, D., Molinaro, M., & Wolfgast, B. (1999). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 443–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lambert, N. J., & Ogles, B. M. (1997). The effectiveness of psychotherapy supervision. In C. E. Watkins (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 421–446). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Lawrence, R. M. (1910). Primitive psychotherapy and quackery. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  35. Levant, R. F. (2006). Making psychology a household word. American Psychologist, 61, 383–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marzillier, J. (2004). The myth of evidence-based psychotherapy. The Psychologist, 17, 392–395.Google Scholar
  37. McHugh, R. K., & Barlow, D. H. (2010). The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments. American Psychologist, 65, 73–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meehl, P. E. (1997). Credentialed persons, credentialed knowledge. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Milne, D. (2006). Developing clinical supervision research through reasoned analogies with therapy. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 13, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Milne, D. L. (2009). Evidence-based clinical supervision: Principles and practice. Malden, MA: BPS/Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Milne, D. L. (2010). Can we enhance the training of clinical supervisors? A national pilot study of an evidence-based approach. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 321–328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Milne, D. L., & Dunkerley, C. (2010). Towards evidence-based clinical supervision: The development and evaluation of four CBT guidelines. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 3, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milne, D. L., & James, I. A. (2002). The observed impact of training on competence in clinical supervision. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 55–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Milne, D. L., James, I. A., Keegan, D., & Dudley, M. (2002). Teachers PETS: A new observational measure of experiential training interactions. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milne, D. L., & Reiser, R. (under editorial review). Supervision Adherence and Guidance Evaluation (SAGE): Psychometric assessment of a new instrument for assessing supervisory competence. Available from
  46. Milne, D. L., Reiser, R., Aylott, H., Dunkerley, C., Fitzpatrick, H., & Wharton, S. (2010). The systematic review as an empirical approach to improving CBT supervision. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 3, 278–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milne, D. L., Sheikh, A. I., Pattison, S., & Wilkinson, A. (2011). Evidence-based training for clinical supervisors: A systematic review of 11 controlled studies. The Clinical Supervisor, 30, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Minkoff, K., & Pollack, D. (Eds.). (1997). Managed mental care in the public sector: A survival guide. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
  49. National Advisory Mental Health Council (NAMHC). (1999). Bridging science and service. Washington, DC: NIH. Publication number 99-4353.Google Scholar
  50. NICE. (2003). Guideline development methods: Information for national collaborating centres and guideline developers. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence.Google Scholar
  51. Parry, G. (2000). Developing treatment choice guidelines in psychotherapy. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 273–281.Google Scholar
  52. Peckham, M. (1991). Research and development for the National Health Service. The Lancet, 338, 367–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roth, A., Fonagy, P., & Parry, G. (1996). Psychotherapy research, funding, and evidence-based practice. In A. Roth & P. Fonagy (Eds.), What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research (pp. 37–56). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shapiro, D. A. (1996). ‘Validated’ treatments and evidence-based psychological services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spence, S. H., Wilson, J., Kavanagh, D., Strong, J., & Worrall, L. (2001). Clinical supervision in four mental health professions: A review of the evidence. Behaviour Change, 18, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turpin, G. (2007). Improving access to psychological therapies: Briefing paper. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  58. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Waller, G. (2009). Evidence-based treatment and drift. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 119–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watkins, C. E. (1995). Psychotherapy supervisor development: On musings, models, and metaphor. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 4, 150–158.Google Scholar
  61. Watkins, C. E. (Ed.). (1997). Handbook of psychotherapy supervision. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Watkins, C. E. (1998). Psychotherapy supervision in the 21st century: Some pressing needs and impressing possibilities. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 93–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitman, S. M., Ryan, B., & Rubenstein, D. F. (2001). Psychotherapy supervisor training: Differences between psychiatry and other mental health disciplines. Academic Psychiatry, 25, 156–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Worthen, V. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2007). Outcome-oriented supervision: Advantages of adding systematic client tracking to supportive consultations. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7, 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wright, L. (1986). The changing face of clinical psychology: Impact of service delivery changes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 841–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.Pacific Graduate School of PsychologyPalo Alto UniversityPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations