Advertisement

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 175–180 | Cite as

Creativity Within the Structure: Clinical Expertise and Evidence-Based Treatments

  • Thomas L. Sexton
  • Astrid E. van Dam
Original Paper

Abstract

The emergence of EBT expanded the landscape of good psychotherapy to include clinically relevant science, specificity of clinical process based on comprehensive conceptual/theoretical principles, and the ability to systematically apply and adapt those principles within the complex relational context, in which all family therapy occurs. Yet, EBT has sparked a major debate in the field that is also represented in the discussion regarding clinical expertise. Many of the “either—or” discussions that surround EBT appear in the discussion of clinical expertise. The manuscripts in this issue also illustrate the diversity of perspective, lack of clarity, and even reluctance to integrate EBT and clinical expertise that exists in the field. In this paper we suggest that EBT provide a unique opportunity to bring together the best of clinical intervention science, professional knowledge, and clinical experience and translate them into the most effective systematic approach to helping clients. Using Functional Family Therapy (FFT) as an example, we illustrate how the EBT model provides the very scaffolding that allows for the emergence of clinical expertise.

Keywords

Clinical expertise Family therapy Creativity 

References

  1. APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Drake, R. E., Goldman, H. H., et al. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatry Services, 52(2), 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eells, T., Lambert, K., Kendjelic, E., Turner, L., & Lucas, C. (2005). The quality of psychotherapy case formulations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 579–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21 st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63(3), 146–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Overholser, J. C. (2009). Clinical expertise: A preliminary attempt to clarify its core elements. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1007/s10879-009-9129-1.
  9. Rector, N. A., & Cassin, S. E. (2010). Clinical expertise in cognitive behavioural therapy: Definition and pathways to acquisition. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1007/s10879-010-9136-2.
  10. Rikers, R. M. J., & Verkoeijen, P. P. J. (2007). Clinical expertise research: A history lesson from those who wrote it. Medical Education, 41(12), 1115–1116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Roth, A. D., Fonagy, P., & Parry, G. (1996). Psychotherapy research, funding and evidence based practice. In A. D. Roth & P. Fonagy (Eds.), What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  12. Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2007). The competencies required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioral therapy for people with depression and anxiety disorders. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
  13. Roth, A. D., & Pilling, S. (2008). Using an evidence-based methodology to identify the competences required to deliver effective cognitive and behavioral therapy for depression and anxiety disorders. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schoenwald, S. K., Henggeler, S. W., Brondino, M. J., & Rowland, M. D. (2000). Multisystemic therapy: Monitoring treatment fidelity. Family Process, 39(1), 83–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sexton, T. L. (2007). The therapist as a moderator and mediator in successful therapeutic change. Journal of Family Therapy, 29(2), 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sexton, T. L. (2009a). Functional family therapy: Traditional theory to evidence-based practice. In J. Bray & M. Stanton (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sexton, T. L. (2009b). Functional family therapy: Traditional theory to evidence-based practice. In J. H. Bray & M. S. Stanton (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of family psychology (pp. 327–340). New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sexton, T. L. (2010, in press). Functional family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Brunner Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Sexton, T. L., & Alexander, J. F. (2002). Functional family therapy: An empirically supported, family-based intervention model for at-risk adolescents and their families. In F. W. Kaslow (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychotherapy, Volume II: Cognitive-behavioral approaches (pp. 117–140). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Sexton, T. L., & Alexander, J. F. (2004). Functional family therapy clinical training manual. Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Sexton, T. L., & Alexander, J. F. (2006). Functional family therapy for externalizing disorders in adolescents. In J. Lebow (Ed.), Handbook of clinical family therapy (pp. 164–194). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Sexton, T. L., Alexander, J. F., & Gilman, L. (2004). Functional family therapy: clinical supervision training manual. Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Sexton, T. L., Alexander, J. F., & Mease, A. L. (2003). Levels of evidence for the models and mechanisms of therapeutic change in couple and family therapy. In M. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Sexton, T. L., & Kelly, S, D. (in press). Finding the common core: Evidence-based practices, clinically relevant evidence, and core mechanisms of change. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. Google Scholar
  25. Sexton, T. L., & Turner, C. T. (in press). The effectiveness of functional family therapy for youth with behavioral problems in a community practice setting. Journal of Family Psychology.Google Scholar
  26. Shaw, B. F. (1984). Specification of the training and evaluation of cognitive therapists for outcome studies. In J. Williams & R. Spitzer (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Where are we and where should we go? (pp. 173–189). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, A., Goodwin, D., et al. (2003). Expertise in practice: an ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 91(3), 319–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vakoch, D., & Strupp, H. (2000). The evolution of psychotherapy training: Reflections on manual-based learning and future alternatives. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(3), 309–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 631–663.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Adolescent and Family StudiesIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.FFT AssociatesBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations