Ten Criteria to Qualify As a Scientist-Practitioner in Clinical Psychology: An Immodest Proposal for Objective Standards
The term ‘scientist-practitioner’ has never been defined in clear or objective terminology. Detailed criteria may help to guide new generations of clinical psychologists to live by the ideals of the Boulder model. Ten criteria are proposed for evaluating the scientist-practitioner in clinical psychology across three domains: scholarship, clinical practice, and the integration of science and practice in psychology. The scientist-practitioner remains active in scholarly works, making regular contributions to the field. These contributions are visible at a national level of impact, and they extend beyond teaching. The scientist-practitioner remains active in the clinical practice of psychology, conducting face-to-face work with clients on regular basis, even if it involves a rather modest time commitment. The clinical services reflect standard clinical practices and extend beyond the supervision of others. The scientist-practitioner strives to integrate the science and practice of psychology. This integration centers around evidence-based practice, and can be seen when scholarship examines issues relevant to mental illness and its treatment.
KeywordsScience Practice Integration
I want to thank the following people for thoughtful, helpful, supportive, and critical comments on these issues and earlier drafts of this paper: Bob Butler, Jim Yokley, Julia DiFilippo, Susan Knell, Nicole Peak, Abby Braden, Patti Watson, Lauren Fisher, Katie Brooks, and Christina Vasilev.
- American Psychological Association, Division of Clinical Psychology. (1991). The definition and description of clinical psychology. The Clinical Psychologist, 44(1), 5–11.Google Scholar
- Freedheim, D., & Overholser, J. C. (1997). Training issues in clinical psychology. In J. Matthews & C. E. Walker (Eds.), Basic skills and professional issues in clinical psychology (pp. 243–264). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Haynes, S., Lemsky, C., & Sexton-Radek, K. (1987). The scientist-practitioner model in clinical psychology. In J. McNamara & M. Appel (Eds.), Critical issues, developments, and trends in professional psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–29). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Jex, S. (2002). Organizational psychology: A scientist-practitioner approach. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Norcross, J., Klonsky, E., & Tropiano, H. (2008). The research-practice gap: Clinical scientists and independent practitioners speak. The Clinical Psychologist, 61(3), 14–17.Google Scholar
- Raimy, V. (1950). Training in clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, D. (2002). Renewing the scientist-practitioner model. The Psychologist, 15(5), 232–234.Google Scholar