Does the Treatment of Cognitive Distortions Improve Clinical Outcomes for Problem Gambling?
- 354 Downloads
Although dysfunctional beliefs about gambling outcomes among problem gamblers have been well-established, there is less known about whether specifically treating such beliefs is necessarily more effective than other therapeutic approaches. In the present study, brief, homogenous treatments for problem gambling (i.e., cognitive, behavioral, motivational, minimal intervention) were compared to each other. Each intervention was based on approaches empirically demonstrated to be clinically effective. The treatment sample consisted primarily of middle-aged, non-partnered, underemployed men recruited from the community via newspaper advertisements. The results showed that a cognitive approach did not yield superior outcomes than did treatments that did not explicitly address cognitive distortions. It is likely that there are several pathways to therapeutic change that may not necessarily require the modification of gambling-related psychopathology.
KeywordsPathological gambling Cognitive distortions Treatment outcome
This research was supported by a grant from the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the Center for Addiction and Mental Health. This study was conducted with the invaluable assistance of Ms. Naila Daniel, who provided the research support for this study as well as delivering the minimal intervention, and the talented and effective study therapists, Dr. Donna Ferguson and Ms. Bernie Raymond.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Brockner, J., & Rubin, J. Z. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Gaboury, A., & Ladouceur, R. (1989). Erroneous perceptions and gambling. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 411–420.Google Scholar
- Korn, D. A., & Shaffer, H. (2004). Practice guidelines for treating gambling-related problems: An evidence-based treatment guide for clinicians. Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling.Google Scholar
- Ladouceur, R., & Dube, D. (1997). Erroneous perceptions in generating random sequences: Identification and strength of a basic misconception in gambling behavior. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 56, 256–259.Google Scholar
- McCambridge, J., & Strang, J. (2004). The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: Results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 99, 39–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00564.x.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1992). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Toneatto, T. (1999b). The Gambling Cognition Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston.Google Scholar
- Toneatto, T. (2002b). Cognitive distortions among problem gamblers. Paper presented at the Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
- Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T., Calderwood, K., Dragonetti, R., & Tsanos, A. (1997). Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 253–266.Google Scholar
- Toneatto, T., & Millar, G. (2004). The assessment and treatment of problem gambling: Empirical status and promising trends. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 173–181.Google Scholar
- Walker, M. (1992). The psychology of gambling. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar