Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 221–229 | Cite as

Does the Treatment of Cognitive Distortions Improve Clinical Outcomes for Problem Gambling?

Original Paper

Abstract

Although dysfunctional beliefs about gambling outcomes among problem gamblers have been well-established, there is less known about whether specifically treating such beliefs is necessarily more effective than other therapeutic approaches. In the present study, brief, homogenous treatments for problem gambling (i.e., cognitive, behavioral, motivational, minimal intervention) were compared to each other. Each intervention was based on approaches empirically demonstrated to be clinically effective. The treatment sample consisted primarily of middle-aged, non-partnered, underemployed men recruited from the community via newspaper advertisements. The results showed that a cognitive approach did not yield superior outcomes than did treatments that did not explicitly address cognitive distortions. It is likely that there are several pathways to therapeutic change that may not necessarily require the modification of gambling-related psychopathology.

Keywords

Pathological gambling Cognitive distortions Treatment outcome 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A., & Silove, D. (1995). Cognitive and behavioral therapies for pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11, 195–219. doi:10.1007/BF02107115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breen, R., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). Chasing in gambling behavior: Personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1097–1111. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00052-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockner, J., & Rubin, J. Z. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A social psychological analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Dickerson, M., Hinchy, J., & England, S. L. (1990). Minimal treatments and problem gamblers: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 87–101. doi:10.1007/BF01015751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaboury, A., & Ladouceur, R. (1989). Erroneous perceptions and gambling. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 411–420.Google Scholar
  7. Gilovich, T., & Douglas, C. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 228–241. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90026-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., & El-Guebaly, N. (2001). Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 50–57. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.69.1.50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodgins, D. C., Makarchuk, K., El-Guebaly, N., & Peden, N. (2002). Why problem gamblers quite gambling: A comparison of methods and samples. Addiction Research and Theory, 10, 203–218. doi:10.1080/16066350290017239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Joukhador, J., Maccallum, F., & Blaszczynski, A. (2003). Differences in cognitive distortions between problem and social gamblers. Psychological Reports, 92, 1203–1214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. King, K. M. (1990). Neutralizing marginally deviant behavior: Bingo players and superstition. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 43–62. doi:10.1007/BF01015748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Korn, D. A., & Shaffer, H. (2004). Practice guidelines for treating gambling-related problems: An evidence-based treatment guide for clinicians. Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling.Google Scholar
  13. Ladouceur, R., & Dube, D. (1997). Erroneous perceptions in generating random sequences: Identification and strength of a basic misconception in gambling behavior. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 56, 256–259.Google Scholar
  14. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., Leblond, J., et al. (2001). Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 773–780. doi:10.1097/00005053-200111000-00007.Google Scholar
  15. McCambridge, J., & Strang, J. (2004). The efficacy of single-session motivational interviewing in reducing drug consumption and perceptions of drug-related risk and harm among young people: Results from a multi-site cluster randomized trial. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 99, 39–52. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00564.x.Google Scholar
  16. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1992). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Gambling addiction and the evolution of the ‘near miss’. Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 407–411. doi:10.1080/16066350410001728118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity and treatments. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., et al. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 555–567. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porta, N., Bonet, C., & Cobo, E. (2007). Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 663–669. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 111–134. doi:10.1023/A:1023042708217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Slutske, W. S. (2006). Natural recovery and treatment-seeking in pathological gambling: Results of two U.S. National Surveys. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 297–302. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slutske, W. S., Jackson, K. M., & Sher, J. J. (2003). The natural history of problem gambling from age 18 to 29. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 263–274. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.2.263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stinchfield, R. (2003). Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 180–182. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toneatto, T. (1999a). Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Substance Use and Misuse, 34, 1593–1604. doi:10.3109/10826089909039417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Toneatto, T. (1999b). The Gambling Cognition Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  27. Toneatto, T. (2002a). Cognitive treatment of problem gambling. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 72–78. doi:10.1016/S1077-7229(02)80043-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toneatto, T. (2002b). Cognitive distortions among problem gamblers. Paper presented at the Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  29. Toneatto, T. (2005). A perspective on problem gambling treatment: Issues and challenges. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 75–80. doi:10.1007/s10899-004-1925-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T., Calderwood, K., Dragonetti, R., & Tsanos, A. (1997). Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 253–266.Google Scholar
  31. Toneatto, T., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). The treatment of pathological gambling: A critical review of the literature. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17(4), 284–292. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.17.4.284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Toneatto, T., & Millar, G. (2004). The assessment and treatment of problem gambling: Empirical status and promising trends. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 173–181.Google Scholar
  33. Walker, M. (1992). The psychology of gambling. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical Research Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations