Skip to main content
Log in

Implementing the Boulder Model of Training in a Psychology Training Clinic

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scientist–practitioner (S–P) model of training has guided professional psychology in the United States for nearly six decades. However, since its inception, the model has been hotly debated and implementation of the model has been chronically problematic. One counseling psychologist who is working as both a faculty member and psychology training clinic director describes how scientific principles can be retained in a practice setting. He overviews the Boulder model of training, provides a brief review of the psychology training clinic (PTC), describes his current work setting and unique faculty appointment, and outlines five strategies for integrating science and practice in applied clinical settings. He also highlights how embracing the Boulder model has promoted a strong professional identity and presents the PTC as a model professional home for S–Ps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of Directors of Psychology Training Clinics (n.d). Retrieved December 12, 2006 from http://ADPTC.org.

  • Baker, D. B., & Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2000). The affirmation of the scientist–practitioner: A look back at Boulder [Electronic version]. American Psychologist, 55, 241–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnette, V. (2006). A scholarly work commitment in practice. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraclough, D. J. (2006). Improving what we do: Putting scientist–practitioner training into practice in a master’s-level counsellor education program. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belar, C. D. (2000). Scientist–practitioner = (does not equal) science + practice: Boulder is bolder. American Psychologist, 55, 249–250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brotemarkle, R. A. (1947). Fifty years of clinical psychology, 1896–1946. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, J. L., & Hynan, M. T. (2005). Models of psychotherapy outcome: Are they applicable in training clinics? Psychological Services, 2, 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counseling Psychology Division 17 (n.d.). Retrieved December 8, 2006 from http://www.div17.org.

  • Cukrowicz, K. C., White, B. A., Reitzel, L. R., Burns, A. B., Driscoll, K. A., Kemper, T. S., & Joiner, T. E. (2005). Improved treatment outcomes associated with the shift to empirically supported treatments in a graduate training clinic. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 330–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelso, C. J. (1993). On the making of a scientist–practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 468–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfried, M. R. (1984). Training the clinician as scientist-professional. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 477–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotham, H. J. (2006). Advancing the implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice: How do we get there from here? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(6), 606–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halgin, R. P. (1986). Problems of service and research in psychology department clinics. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harway, N. I., & Serfica, F. C. (1977). Issues in the evaluation of the psychology department clinic. Professional Psychology, 8, 650–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, B. (1984). The future of clinical training: Forward into the past. The Clinical Psychologist, 37, 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., Carter, J., Claiborn, C. D., Brooks, L., Gelso, C. J., Fassinger, R. E., Holloway, E. L., Stone, G. L., Wampold, B. E., & Galassi, J. P. (1992). A proposal to integrate science and practice in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 20, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppner, P. P., Casas, J. M., Carter, J., & Stone, G. L. (2000). The maturation of counseling psychology: Multifaceted perspectives, 1978–1998. In S. D. Brown, & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 3–49). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarmon, H., & Halgin, R. P. (1987). The role of the psychology department training clinic in training scientist-professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 509–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. H., & Gelso, C. J. (1997). Factor structure of the research training environmental scale—revised: Implications for research training in applied psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umphress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingame, G., Huefner, J. C., & Reisinger, C. W. (2001). Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ 45.2). Wilmington, DE: American Professional Credentialing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mordock, J. B. (1970). The case for the clinic. Professional Psychology, 1, 420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munley, P. H., Duncan, L. E., McDonnell, K. A., & Sauer, E. M. (2004). Counseling psychology in the United States of America. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 17(3), 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, G. J., Saferstein, J., & Rice, K. G. (2005). Does the model matter? The relationship between science-practice emphasis and outcomes in academic training programs in counseling psychology [Electronic version]. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 635–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Fields, S. A. (2002). Essentials of outcome assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (2007). The Boulder Model in Academia: Struggling to Integrate the Science and Practice of Professional Psychology. [add volume and page numbers from this special issue].

  • Riggs, S. A., & Bretz, K. M. (2006). Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship: An exploratory investigation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(6), 558–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, E. M. (2006). Living the scientist–practitioner model in a psychology training clinic. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, E. M., Anderson, M. Z., Cane, V. E., & Gormley, B. (2005). Therapist and client attachment: Impacts on counseling process and outcome. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Sauer, E. M., Anderson, M. Z., Preacco, L., Richmond, C. J., Klimek, E. J., & Gormley, B. (2003). Client attachment, working alliance, and counseling outcome. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.

  • Sauer, E. M., Lopez, F. G., & Gormley, B. (2003). Respective contributions of therapist and client adult attachment orientations to the development of the early working alliance: A preliminary growth modeling study. Psychotherapy Research, 13, 371–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, J. (1968). The psychological center: A historical note. American Psychologist, 23, 522–523.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serafica, F. C., & Harway, N. I. (1980). The psychology department clinic: Its organization and development. Professional Psychology, 11, 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, L. B., Auerbach, C. F., & Levant, R. F. (2006). Using qualitative research to strengthen clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(4), 351–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D., Pace, T. M., Kashubeck-West, S., Biever, J. L., Patterson, T., & Welch, I. D. (2000). Training models in counseling psychology: Scientitst-pracititioner versus practitioner-scholar. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 622–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vespia, K. M. (2006). Integrating professional identities: Counselling psychologist, scientist–practitioner, and undergraduate educator. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vespia, K. M., & Sauer, E. M. (2006). Defining characteristic or unrealistic ideal: Historical and contemporary perspectives on scientist–practitioner training in counseling psychology. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vespia, K. M., Sauer, E. M., & Lyddon, W. J. (2006). Counselling psychologists as scientist–practitioners: finding unity in diversity—a North American perspective. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 223–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witmer, L. (1996). Clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 51, 248–251. (Reprinted from The Psychological Clinic, 1907, Vol. 1,1–9).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric M. Sauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sauer, E.M., Huber, D.M. Implementing the Boulder Model of Training in a Psychology Training Clinic. J Contemp Psychother 37, 221–228 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-007-9057-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-007-9057-x

Keywords

Navigation