Skip to main content
Log in

The Scientist-Practitioner Model: Now More Than Ever

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scientist-practitioner model has been fundamental to the field of professional psychology for over 50 years. Although other training models have been offered in an attempt to improve training or meet other needs, we view many of the changes suggested by these models as consistent with the original intent of scientist-practitioner training. We argue that the reciprocal effects of science and practice within this model, if appropriately integrated, remain an excellent fit for integrating science and practice and enhancing the quality of both the practice and science of psychology. We address some of the problems with how the model has been implemented and offer recommendations for ways to enhance science and practice integration. Finally, we describe some of the mechanisms we have used to put these principles into practice in our counseling psychology training program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addis, M. E., & Cardemil, E. V. (2006). Psychotherapy manuals can improve outcomes. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health (pp. 131–140). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist-practitioner. New York: Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  • Belar, C. D. (2000). Scientist-practitioner ≠ science + practice: Boulder is bolder. American Psychologist, 55, 249–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bieschke, K. J., Fouad, N. A., Collins, F. L., & Halonen, J. S. (2004). The scientifically-minded psychologist: Science as a core competency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 80, 713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, D. L. (1993). Task force on promotion and dissemination of psychological procedures. Unpublished manuscript, Division 12, American Psychological Association

  • Chambliss, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Daiuto, A., et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Bennett-Johnson, S., Pope, K. S., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49, 5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwalisz, K. (2003). Evidence-based practice: A framework for twenty-first-century scientist-practitioner training. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 497–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (2006). Treatment manuals do not improve outcomes. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health (pp. 140–149). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Falender, C. A., Cornish, J. A. E., Goodyear, R., Hatcher, R., Kaslow, N. J., Leventhal, G., et al. (2004). Defining competencies in psychology supervision: A consensus statement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 771–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, R. L., & Lassiter, K. D. (2005). Report on practicum competencies. www/adptc.org/public_files/cctcPracticumCompetenciesChartRevFeb2005.doc

  • Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M. Jr., & Wampold, B. E. (1999). Research design in counseling (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, K. I., Lueger, R. J., Maling, M., & Martinovich, Z. (1993). A Phase model of psychotherapy: Causal mediation of outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 678–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, K. L., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51(10), 1059–1064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (1991). Introduction to psychotherapy research. In L. E. Beutler, M. Crago, & M. Marjorie (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: An international review of programmatic studies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., & Hawkins, E. J. (2004). Measuring outcome in professional practice: Considerations in selecting and using brief outcome instruments. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 492–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall, R. M. (1991). Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. The Clinical Psychologist, 44, 75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, G. J., Saferstein, J., & Rice, K. G. (2005). Does the model matter? The relationship between science-practice emphasis and outcomes in academic training programs in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 635–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norcross, J. C., Beutler, L. E., & Levant, R. F. (2006). Evidence-based practices in mental health. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ollendick, T. H., & King, N. J. (2006). Empirically supported treatments typically produce outcomes superior to non-empirically supported treatment therapies. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health (pp. 308–317). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlinsky, D. E., Grawe, K., & Parks, B. K. (1994). Process and outcome in psychotherapy–Noch Einmal. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. L., Peterson, D. R., Abrams, J. C., & Stricker, G. (1997). The National Council of Schools and Programs of Professional Psychology educational model. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimy, V. C. (Ed.). (1950). Training in clinical psychology (Boulder conference). New York: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. M. (2006). Clinical expertise. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health (pp. 13–23). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G. M., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Messer, S. B. (2006). Dialogue: Convergence and contention. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health (pp. 40–55). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D. (2005a). Reflections on reflections: Training in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 683–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D. (2005b). Enhancing professional competence through developmental approaches to supervision. American Psychologist, 6, 855–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D., Kaslow, N. J., Cornish, J., Felander, C., Bjorkman, A., & Goodyear, R. K., et al. (2003). Future directions in education and credentialing in clinical supervision. Annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada

  • Stoltenberg, C. D., McNeill, B. W., & Delworth, U. (1998). IDM supervision: An integrated developmental model for supervising counselors and therapists. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltenberg, C. D., Pace, T. M., Kashubeck, S., Biever, J. L., Patterson, T., & Welch, I. D. (2000). Training models in counseling psychology: Scientist-practitioner versus practitioner-scholar. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 622–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, G. (1997). Are science and practice commensurable? American Psychologist, 52, 442–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, G. (2006). A poor fit between empirically supported treatments and psychotherapy integration. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health (pp. 275–282). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, G., & Treirweiler, S. J. (1995). The local clinical scientist: A bridge between science and practice. American Psychologist, 50, 995–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. S., & Super, D. E. (Eds.). (1964). The professional preparation of counseling psychologists: Report of the 1964 Greyston conference. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E. (2006). Not a scintilla of evidence to support empirically supported treatments as more effective than other treatments. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, & R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health (pp. 299–308). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment failure and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cal D. Stoltenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoltenberg, C.D., Pace, T.M. The Scientist-Practitioner Model: Now More Than Ever. J Contemp Psychother 37, 195–203 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-007-9054-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-007-9054-0

Keywords

Navigation