Skip to main content
Log in

What is Psychotherapy for? A Plausible Alternative to Empirically Supported Therapies, Therapy Relationships, and Practice Guidelines

  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Task forces come up with empirically supported therapies and therapist-client relationships. A careful study of their research provides an empirically supported answer to the long-standing question of what psychotherapy is for. Accordingly, if your way of doing therapy falls outside the empirically based boundary, (a) you can risk declining their ‘practice guidelines;’ (b) you can develop your own ‘practice guidelines;’ and (c) you can pursue some exciting implications from having an alternative set of guidelines for how to do psychotherapy. A strategy is proposed as a plausible alternative to the task forces’ empirically based strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association (1995). Template for developing guidelines: Interventions for mental disorders and psychological aspects of physical disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Caine, D. J., & Seeman, J. (Eds.) (2002) Humanistic psychotherapies: Handbook of research and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., et al. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 685–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, I., Parloff, M. B., Hadley, S. W., & Autry, J. H. (1985). NIMH treatment of depression collaboration research program: Background and research plan. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladis, M. M., Gosch, E. A., Dishuk, N. M., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1999). Quality of life: Expanding the scope of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 320-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984). Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., & Wilson, G. T. (1978). Evaluation of behavior therapy: Issues, evidence, and research strategies. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C. (1998). Empirically supported psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Grove, W. (1988). Normative comparisons in therapy outcome. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., Marrs-Garcia, A., Nath, S. R., & Sheldrick, R. C. (1999). Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. C., & Norton-Ford, J. D. (1982). Therapy outcome research methods. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher, (Eds.) Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 429–460). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahrer, A. R. (1989). Experiencing: A humanistic theory of psychology and psychiatry. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahrer, A. R. (1996/2004). The complete guide to experiential psychotherapy. Boulder, Colorado: Bull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahrer, A. R. (2002). Review of “Humanistic psychotherapies: Handbook of research and practice.” Psychotherapy Research, 12, 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahrer, A. R., & Fairweather, D. R. (1993). What is “experiencing”? A critical review of the meanings and applications in psychotherapy. The Humanistic Psychologist, 21, 2–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, P. E. (1998). Practice guidelines: Not yet ideal. American Psychologist, 53, 290–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzel, M. T., & Trull, T. J. (1988). Meta-analytic approaches to social comparisons: A method for measuring clinical significance. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 146–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, 965–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telch, M. J., Schmid, N. B., Jaimez, L., Jacquin, K. M., & Harrington, P. J. (1995). Impact of cognitive-behavioral treatment on quality of life in panic disorder patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 823–830.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvin R. Mahrer Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahrer, A.R. What is Psychotherapy for? A Plausible Alternative to Empirically Supported Therapies, Therapy Relationships, and Practice Guidelines. J Contemp Psychother 35, 99–115 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-005-0806-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-005-0806-4

Keywords

Navigation