Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of price subsidy and fairness concern on pricing and benefits of take-away supply chain

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, from the perspective of game theory, we study the impact of price subsidy and fairness concern on the pricing strategies and benefits of members in the take-away industry. In the single-channel supply chain, we build a Stackelberg game model between the take-away platform and the restaurant for the online take-away business. By comparing and analyzing the product pricing and revenue in the cases of no price subsidy and price subsidy, we obtain the optimal pricing strategy for both parties. In the dual-channel supply chain, we explore the benefits of supply chain members under the combined effects of fairness concern and price subsidy. Under the single channel price subsidy model, we find that restaurant always raises prices, and the price increase is directly proportional to the subsidy intensity. Such a proper price increase always brings more benefits to both parties. Under the dual-channel model, consumer fairness concern may curb the price increase behavior of restaurants. Regardless of the model, in the long term, the optimal subsidy of the platform will decrease with the expansion of the online take-away market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. Rand J Econ 37(3):668–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken and egg: competition among intermediation service providers. Rand J Econ 34(2):309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Manag Sci 53(8):1304–1314

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan D, Li C (2019) Research on supply chain pricing and utility based on product cost performance difference and two-channel fairness. Ind Eng Manag, pp 1–11. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/31.1738.T.20190929.1537.004.html

  • iiMedia Research (2018-2019) China online catering and take-away market research report [EB/OL]. https://www.iimedia.cn/c400/64223.html

  • Kurata H, Yao DQ, Liu JJ (2007) Pricing policies under direct vs indirect channel competition and national vs. store brand competition. Eur J Oper Res 180(1):262–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Huang Z (2019) Subsidy strategy of pharmaceutical e-commerce platform based on two-sided market theory. PLoS ONE 14(10):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Li G, Zhang W (2017) Chanel integration strategy based on e-coupin in a multi-channel supply chain. Oper Res Manag Sci 2:192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo K, Ni G (2019) The effects of price subsidy on take-away pricing and revenue. In: 2019 international conference on industrial engineering and systems management (IESM), pp. 1–5

  • Ma W, Zhao Z, Ke H (2013) Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy. Eur J Oper Res 226(2):221–227

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nie T, Du S (2017) Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts. Eur J Oper Res 258(2):491–500

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pan K, Cui Z, Xing A, Lu Q (2020) Impact of fairness concern on retailer-dominated supply chain. Comput Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin F, Mai F, Fry MJ (2016) Supply-chain performance anomalies: fairness concerns under private cost information. Eur J Oper Res 252(1):170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: a progress report. Rand J Econ 37(3):645–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Dwivedi G, Singh A (2019) Game-theoretic analysis of a two-echelon supply chain with option contract under fairness concerns. Comput Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Z (2018) Price subsidy and O2O service strategy for online platforms in the context of Internet plus. J Commer Econ 19:80–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Chen H, Zhang J (2014) Coordinating a retailer’s O2O supply chain under online subsidy. Chin J Manag Sci S1:479–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue Z, Cheng S, Yu M, Zou L (2019) Pricing models of two-sided markets incorporating service quality. Kybernetes 48(8):1827–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi Z, Wang Y, Liu Y, Chen Y (2018) The Impact of consumer fairness seeking on distribution channel selection: direct selling vs. agent selling. Prod Oper Manag 27(6):1148–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Savage JS, Chen Y (2015) Consumer uncertainty and price discrimination through online coupons: an empirical study of restaurants in Shanghai. Inf Econ Policy 33:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X, Guo X (2016) E-retailing of restaurant services: pricing strategies in a competing online environment. J Oper Res Soc 67(11):1408–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the MOE Layout Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences (20YJA630049), National Natural Science Foundation of China (71501045), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University, and Special Foundation for Science and Technology Innovation of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanqun Ni.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Luo, K. & Ni, G. The effects of price subsidy and fairness concern on pricing and benefits of take-away supply chain. J Comb Optim 43, 1106–1124 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00625-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00625-w

Keywords

Navigation