Abstract
In this paper, we study the three-sided matching problems with mixed preferences, where three agent sets are U, V and W. We discussed two matching problems with different types of preferences. The first is that each \(u\in U\) has a strict preference over set V, each \(v\in V\) has a strict preference over set W, each \(w\in W\) has a strict preference over set V and each \(w\in W\) has a strict preference over set U. The second is that each \(u\in U\) has a strict preference over set V, each \(v\in V\) has a strict preference over set W and each \(w\in W\) has a strict preference over set \(U\times V=\{(u,v)|u\in U,v\in V \}\). For these two kinds of matching problems, we give the concept of stable matching and the algorithm of solving stable matching respectively. Finally, we discuss the relationship between these two matching problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afacan MO (2012) Group robust stability in matching markets. Games Econ Behav 74(1):394–398
Anshelevich E, Bhardwaj O, Hoefer M (2017) Stable matching with network externalities. Algorithmica 78(3):1067–1106
Baiou M, Balinski M (2000) Many-to-many matching: stable polyandrous polygamy (or polygamous polyandry). Discrete Appl Math 101(1–3):1–12
Bansal V, Agrawal A, Malhotra VS (2007) Polynomial time algorithm for an optimal stable assignment with multiple partners. Theor Comput Sci 379(3):317–328
Biró P, McDermid E (2010) Three-sided stable matchings with cyclic preferences. Algorithmica 58(1):5–18
Boros E, Gurvich V, Jaslar S, Krasner D (2004) Stable matchings in three-sided systems with cyclic preferences. Discrete Math 289(1–3):1–10
Eriksson K, Sjöstrand J, Strimling P (2006) Three-dimensional stable matching with cyclic preferences. Math Soc Sci 52(1):77–87
Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69(1):9–15
Huang CC (2007) Two’s company, three’s a crowd: stable family and threesome roommates problems. In: European symposium on algorithms. Springer, Berlin, pp 558–569
Huang CC (2010) Circular stable matching and 3-way kidney transplant. Algorithmica 58(1):137–150
Huang CC, Kavitha T (2015) Improved approximation algorithms for two variants of the stable marriage problem with ties. Math Program 154(1–2):353–380
Manlove DF (2002) The structure of stable marriage with indifference. Discrete Appl Math 122(1–3):167–181
Manlove DF, McBride I, Trimble J (2017) “Almost-stable” matchings in the hospitals/residents problem with couples. Constraints 22(1):50–72
McDermid E, Irving RW (2014) Sex-equal stable matchings: complexity and exact algorithms. Algorithmica 68(3):545–570
McDermid EJ, Manlove DF (2010) Keeping partners together: algorithmic results for the hospitals/residents problem with couples. J Comb Optim 19(3):279–303
Ng C, Hirschberg DS (1991) Three-dimensional stabl matching problems. SIAM J Discrete Math 4(2):245–252
Romero-Medina A (2001) ‘Sex-equal’ stable matchings. Theor Decis 50(3):197–212
Roth AE (1989) Two-sided matching with incomplete information about others’ preferences. Games Econ Behav 1(2):191–209
Zhang F, Li J, Fan J, Shen H, Shen J, Yu H (2019) Three-dimensional stable matching with hybrid preferences. J Comb Optim 37(1):330–336
Zhong L, Bai Y (2019) Three-sided stable matching problem with two of them as cooperative partners. J Comb Optim 37(1):286–292
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Item Number: 71520107003), the Shanghai Science Committee of China (Item Number: 17495810503), the Gaoyuan Discipline of Shanghai-Environmental Science and Engineering (Resource Recycling Science and Engineering), and the Applied Mathematical Subject of SSPU. We would like to express our heartfelt thanks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, F., Zhong, L. Three-sided matching problem with mixed preferences. J Comb Optim 42, 928–936 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-019-00501-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-019-00501-2