Skip to main content
Log in

On the \(p\)-reinforcement and the complexity

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Let \(G=(V,E)\) be a graph and \(p\) be a positive integer. A subset \(S\subseteq V\) is called a \(p\)-dominating set if each vertex not in \(S\) has at least \(p\) neighbors in \(S\). The \(p\)-domination number \(\gamma _p(G)\) is the size of a smallest \(p\)-dominating set of \(G\). The \(p\)-reinforcement number \(r_p(G)\) is the smallest number of edges whose addition to \(G\) results in a graph \(G^{\prime }\) with \(\gamma _p(G^{\prime })< \gamma _p(G)\). In this paper, we give an original study on the \(p\)-reinforcement, determine \(r_p(G)\) for some graphs such as paths, cycles and complete \(t\)-partite graphs, and establish some upper bounds on \(r_p(G)\). In particular, we show that the decision problem on \(r_p(G)\) is NP-hard for a general graph \(G\) and a fixed integer \(p\ge 2\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Blidia M, Chellali M, Favaron O (2005) Independence and 2-domination in trees. Australas J Combin 33:317–327

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Blidia M, Chellali M, Volkmann L (2006) Some bounds on the p-domination number in trees. Discret Math 306:2031–2037

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Blair JRS, Goddard W, Hedetniemi ST, Horton S, Jones P, Kubicki G (2008) On domination and reinforcement numbers in trees. Discret Math 308:1165–1175

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chellali M, Favaron O, Hansberg A, Volkmann L (2012) k-domination and k-independence in graphs: a survey. Graphs Combin. 28(1):1-55

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro Y, Roditty Y (1990) A note on the \(k\)-domination number of a graph. Int J Math Sci 13:205–206

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Sun L, Ma D (2003) Bondage and reinforcement number of \(\gamma _f\) for complete multipartite graph. J Beijing Inst Technol 12:89–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar JE, Haynes TW, Teschner U, Volkmann L (1998) Bondage, insensitivity, and reinforcement. In: Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (eds) Domination in graphs: advanced topics, pp 471–489. Monogr. Textbooks Pure Appl. Math., 209, Marcel Dekker, New York, .

  • Domke GS, Laskar RC (1997) The bondage and reinforcement numbers of \(\gamma _f\) for some graphs. Discret Math 167/168:249–259

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Downey RG, Fellows MR (1995) Fixed-parameter tractability and completeness I: basic results. SIAM J Comput 24:873–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey RG, Fellows MR (1997) Fixed-parameter tractability and completeness II: on completeness for \(W[1]\). Theor Comput Sci 54(3):465–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaron O (1985) On a conjecture of Fink and Jacobson concerning \(k\)-domination and \(k\)-dependence. J Combin Theory Ser B 39:101–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink JF, Jacobson MS (1985) \(n\)-domination in graphs. In: Alavi Y, Schwenk AJ (eds) Graph theory with applications to algorithms and computer science. Wiley, New York, pp 283–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of NP-completeness. Freeman, San Francisco

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998a) Fundamentals of domination in graphs. Marcel Deliker, New York

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998b) Domination in graphs: advanced topics. Marcel Deliker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Henning MA, Rad NJ, Raczek J (2011) A note on total reinforcement in graph. Discret Appl Math 159:1443–1446

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hu F-T, Xu J-M (2012) On the complexity of the bondage and reinforcement problems. J Complex. 28(2): 192-201

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Wang JW, Xu J-M (2009) Reinforcement number of digraphs. Discret Appl Math 157:1938–1946

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kok J, Mynhardt CM (1990) Reinforcement in graphs. Congr Numer 79:225–231

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sridharan N, Elias MD, Subramanian VSA (2007) Total reinforcement number of a graph. AKCE Int J Graph Comb 4(2):192–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J-M (2003) Theory and application of graphs. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JH, Liu HL, Sun L (2003) Independence bondage and reinforcement number of some graphs. Trans Beijing Inst Technol 23:140–142

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by NNSF of China (No.10711233) and the Fundamental Research Fund of NPU (No. JC201150)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun-Ming Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, Y., Hu, FT. & Xu, JM. On the \(p\)-reinforcement and the complexity. J Comb Optim 29, 389–405 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-013-9597-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-013-9597-9

Keywords

Navigation