Skip to main content
Log in

A Framework for the Complexity of High-Multiplicity Scheduling Problems

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this note is to propose a complexity framework for the analysis of high multiplicity scheduling problems. Part of this framework relies on earlier work aiming at the definition of output-sensitive complexity measures for the analysis of algorithms which produce “large” outputs. However, different classes emerge according as we look at schedules as sets of starting times, or as related single-valued mappings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Bar-Noy, R. Bhatia, J.S. Naor, and B. Schiber, “Minimizing service and operation costs of periodic scheduling,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 27, pp. 518–544, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Brauner and Y. Crama, “The maximum deviation just-in-time scheduling problem,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, vol. 134, pp. 25–50, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Brauner, Y. Crama, A. Grigoriev, and J. van de Klundert, “On the complexity of high-multiplicity scheduling problems,” University of Liège, Liège, Belgium, Working paper GEMME 0110, 2001.

  • N. Brauner, G. Finke, and W. Kubiak, “Complexity of one-cycle robotic flow-shops,” Journal of Scheduling, vol. 6, pp. 355–371, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Clifford and M. E. Posner, “High multiplicity in earliness-tardiness scheduling,” Operations Research, vol. 48, pp. 788–800, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Clifford and M.E. Posner, “Parallel machine scheduling with high multiplicity,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 89, pp. 359–383, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.S. Cosmadakis and C.H. Papadimitriou, “The traveling salesman problem with many visits to few cities,” SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 13, pp. 99–108, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Dyer, “The complexity of vertex enumeration methods,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 8, pp. 381–402, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, Freeman: San Francisco, CA, 1979.

  • F. Granot and J. Skorin-Kapov, “On polynomial solvability of the high multiplicity total weighted tardiness problem,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, vol. 41, pp. 139–146, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Grigoriev, “High Multiplicity Scheduling Problems,” Maastricht University, The Netherlands, Doctoral thesis, 2003.

  • D.S. Hochbaum and R. Shamir, “Minimizing the number of tardy job units under release time constraints,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, vol. 28, pp. 45–57, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Hochbaum and R. Shamir, “Strongly polynomial algorithms for the high multiplicity scheduling problem,” Operations Research, vol. 39, pp. 648–653, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Hochbaum, R. Shamir, and J.G. Shanthikumar, “A polynomial algorithm for an integer quadratic nonseparable transportation problem,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 55, pp. 359–376, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hurink and S. Knust, “Makespan minimization for flow-shop problems with transportation times and a single robot,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, vol. 112, pp. 199–216, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.S. Johnson, M. Yannakakis, and C.H. Papadimitriou, “On generating all maximal independent sets,” Information Processing Letters, vol. 27, pp. 119–123, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Kubiak and S.P. Sethi, “A note on “Level schedules for mixed-model assembly lines in just-in-time production systems,” Management Science, vol. 37, pp. 121–122, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Kubiak and S.P. Sethi, “Optimal just-in-time schedules for flexible transfer lines,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, vol. 6, pp. 137–154, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, “Generating all maximal independent sets: NP-hardness and polynomial-time algorithms,” SIAM Journal on Computing, vol. 9, pp. 558–565, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.T. McCormick, S.R. Smallwood, and F.C.R. Spieksma, “A polynomial algorithm for multiprocessor scheduling with two job lengths,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 26, pp. 31–49, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Miltenburg, “Level schedules for mixed-model assembly lines in just-in-time production systems,” Management Science, vol. 35, pp. 192–207, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Munier and F. Sourd, “Scheduling chains on a single machine with non-negative time-lags,” Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, vol. 57, pp. 111–123, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Papadimitriou and K. Steiglitz, Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Pinedo, Scheduling: Theory, Algorithms and Systems, Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Posner, “The complexity of earliness and tardiness scheduling problems under id-encoding,” New York University, New York, U.S.A, Working Paper 85–70, 1985.

  • H.N. Psaraftis, “A dynamic programming approach for sequencing groups of identical jobs,” Operations Research, vol. 28, pp. 1347–1359, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rothkopf, “The travelling salesman problem: On the reduction of certain large problems to smaller ones,” Operations Research, vol. 14, pp. 532–533, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Steiner and J.S. Yeomans, “Level schedules for mixed-model, just-in-time processes,” Management Science, vol. 39, pp. 728–735, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Brauner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brauner, N., Crama, Y., Grigoriev, A. et al. A Framework for the Complexity of High-Multiplicity Scheduling Problems. J Comb Optim 9, 313–323 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-005-1414-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-005-1414-7

Keywords

Navigation