Skip to main content
Log in

Is EIT-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration for optimizing PEEP in ARDS the white elephant in the room? A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a novel real-time lung imaging technology for personalized ventilation adjustments, indicating promising results in animals and humans. The present study aimed to assess its clinical utility for improved ventilation and oxygenation compared to traditional protocols. Comprehensive electronic database screening was done until 30th November, 2023. Randomized controlled trialscontrolled clinical trials, comparative cohort studies, and assessments of EIT-guided PEEP titration and conventional methods in adult ARDS patients regarding outcome, ventilatory parameters, and P/F ratio were included. Our search retrieved five controlled cohort studies and two RCTs with 515 patients and overall reduced risk of mortality [RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.95; I2 = 0%], better dynamic compliance [MD = 3.46; 95% CI: 1.59 to 5.34; I2 = 0%] with no significant difference in PaO2/FiO2 ratio [MD = 6.5; 95%CI -13.86 to 26.76; I2 = 74%]. The required information size except PaO2/FiO2 was achieved for a power of 95% based on the 50% reduction in risk of mortality, 10% improved compliance as the cumulative Z-score of the said outcomes crossed the alpha spending boundary and did not dip below the inner wedge of futility. EIT-guided individualized PEEP titration is a novel modality; further well-designed studies are needed to substantiate its utility.

Highlights

Question: Is the EIT-guided PEEP titration in ARDS universally beneficial and effective?

Findings: This systematic review found better survivability, dynamic compliance, in ARDS patients, as the required information size was achieved for a power of 95%. There was no significant improvement in oxygenation and successful weaning incidence compared to conventional methods. However, the required information size for these contexts is yet to be achieved.

Meaning: EIT-guided PEEP titration in ARDS patients showed promising results and warranted further clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data openly available in a public repository & derived data is available on request.

References

  1. Liu S, Tan L, Möller K, et al. Identification of regional overdistension, recruitment and cyclic alveolar collapse with electrical impedance tomography in an experimental ARDS model. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):119. Published 2016 May 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1300-y.

  2. Franchineau G, Bréchot N, Lebreton G, et al. Bedside contribution of electrical impedance tomography to setting positive end-expiratory pressure for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-treated patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(4):447–57. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201605-1055OC.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dargaville PA, Rimensberger PC, Frerichs I. Regional tidal ventilation and compliance during a stepwise vital capacity manoeuvre. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(11):1953–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolf GK, Gómez-Laberge C, Rettig JS, et al. Mechanical ventilation guided by electrical impedance tomography in experimental acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(5):1296–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182771516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pereira SM, Tucci MR, Morais CCA, et al. Individual positive end-expiratory pressure settings optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation and reduce postoperative atelectasis. Anesthesiology. 2018;129(6):1070–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. He X, Jiang J, Liu Y, et al. Electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP Titration in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(14): e3306. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krause U, Becker K, Hahn G, Dittmar J, Ruschewski W, Paul T. Monitoring of regional lung ventilation using electrical impedance tomography after cardiac surgery in infants and children. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35(6):990–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-0886-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu K, Huang C, Xu M, et al. PEEP guided by electrical impedance tomography during one-lung ventilation in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(23):757. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.11.95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Frerichs I, Amato MB, van Kaam AH, et al. Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group. Thorax. 2017;72(1):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Costa EL, Borges JB, Melo A, et al. Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension by electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(6):1132–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1447-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gómez-Laberge C, Arnold JH, Wolf GK. A unified approach for EIT imaging of regional overdistension and atelectasis in acute lung injury. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31(3):834–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2012.2183641.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Victorino JA, Borges JB, Okamoto VN, et al. Imbalances in regional lung ventilation: a validation study on electrical impedance tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(7):791–800. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200301-133OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Constantin JM, Grasso S, Chanques G, et al. Lung morphology predicts response to recruitment maneuver in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(4):1108–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d451ec.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Cressoni M. Selecting the “right” positive end-expiratory pressure level. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21(1):50–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Costa ELV, Slutsky AS, Brochard LJ, et al. Ventilatory variables and mechanical power in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;204(3):303–11. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202009-3467OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Cadringher P, et al. Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(4):346–55. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200710-1589OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators, Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA, et al. Effgect of lung recruitment and titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs low peep on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(14):1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14171.

  18. Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, et al. Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(17):1775–86. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):747–55. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao Z, Steinmann D, Frerichs I, Guttmann J, Möller K. PEEP titration guided by ventilation homogeneity: a feasibility study using electrical impedance tomography. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R8. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Erlandsson K, Odenstedt H, Lundin S, Stenqvist O. Positive end-expiratory pressure optimization using electric impedance tomography in morbidly obese patients during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50(7):833–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01079.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Luepschen H, Meier T, Grossherr M, Leibecke T, Karsten J, Leonhardt S. Protective ventilation using electrical impedance tomography. Physiol Meas. 2007;28(7):S247–60. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/28/7/S18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. Published 2021 Mar 29. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

  24. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355: i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:383–94.

  27. Norris SL, Meerpohl JJ, Akl EA, et al. The skills and experience of GRADE methodologists can be assessed with a simple tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;79:150-158.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual for trial sequential analysis (TSA). Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention research, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2011:1–115. Available from www.ctu.dk/tsa. Accessed 29 Dec 2023.

  29. Becher T, Buchholz V, Hassel D, et al. Individualization of PEEP and tidal volume in ARDS patients with electrical impedance tomography: a pilot feasibility study. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):89. Published 2021 Jun 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00877-7.

  30. He H, Chi Y, Yang Y, et al. Early individualized positive end-expiratory pressure guided by electrical impedance tomography in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):230. Published 2021 Jun 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03645-y.

  31. Hsu HJ, Chang HT, Zhao Z, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure titration with electrical impedance tomography and pressure-volume curve: a randomized trial in moderate to severe ARDS. Physiol Meas. 2021;42(1):014002. Published 2021 Feb 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/abd679.

  32. Jimenez JV, Munroe E, Weirauch AJ, et al. Electric impedance tomography-guided PEEP titration reduces mechanical power in ARDS: a randomized crossover pilot trial. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):21. Published 2023 Jan 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04315-x.

  33. Liu X, Liu X, Meng J, et al. Electrical impedance tomography for titration of positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):339. Published 2022 Nov 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04201-y.

  34. Somhorst P, van der Zee P, Endeman H, Gommers D. PEEP-FiO2 table versus EIT to titrate PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):272. Published 2022 Sep 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04135-5.

  35. Zhao Z, Chang MY, Chang MY, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure titration with electrical impedance tomography and pressure-volume curve in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):7. Published 2019 Jan 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0484-0.

  36. Yu M, Deng Y, Cha J, Jiang L, Wang M, Qiao S, Wang C. PEEP titration by EIT strategies for patients with ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023;47(7):383–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2022.06.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cardinale M, Boussen S, Cungi PJ, et al. Lung-dependent areas collapse, monitored by electrical impedance tomography, may predict the oxygenation response to prone ventilation in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2022;50(7):1093–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jonkman AH, Alcala GC, Pavlovsky B, et al. Lung Recruitment Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (RECRUIT): a multicenter study of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;208(1):25–38. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2300OC.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Heines SJH, Strauch U, van de Poll MCG, Roekaerts PMHJ, Bergmans DCJJ. Clinical implementation of electric impedance tomography in the treatment of ARDS: a single centre experience. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33(2):291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0164-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr Soumya Sarkar (SS): Search strategy, Study selection, Data extraction, Data synthesis, Risk of bias assessment, quality of the evidence assessment, Manuscript drafting and editing. Dr Bharat Yalla (BY): Search strategy, Study selection, Data extraction. Dr Puneet Khanna (PK): Conceptualization, study selection, Risk of bias assessment, quality of the evidence assessment and editing. Dr Madhurjya Baishya (MB): Risk of bias assessment, quality of the evidence assessment.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Puneet Khanna.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Institutional ethical committee approval

Not Applicable.

Prior presentations

Nil.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarkar, S., Yalla, B., Khanna, P. et al. Is EIT-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration for optimizing PEEP in ARDS the white elephant in the room? A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. J Clin Monit Comput (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01158-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01158-x

Keywords

Navigation