Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multimodal non-invasive monitoring to apply an open lung approach strategy in morbidly obese patients during bariatric surgery

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the use of non-invasive variables for monitoring an open-lung approach (OLA) strategy in bariatric surgery. Twelve morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery received a baseline protective ventilation with 8 cmH2O of positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP). Then, the OLA strategy was applied consisting in lung recruitment followed by a decremental PEEP trial, from 20 to 8 cmH2O, in steps of 2 cmH2O to find the lung’s closing pressure. Baseline ventilation was then resumed setting open lung PEEP (OL-PEEP) at 2 cmH2O above this pressure. The multimodal non-invasive variables used for monitoring OLA consisted in pulse oximetry (SpO2), respiratory compliance (Crs), end-expiratory lung volume measured by a capnodynamic method (EELVCO2), and esophageal manometry. OL-PEEP was detected at 15.9 ± 1.7 cmH2O corresponding to a positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL,ee) of 0.9 ± 1.1 cmH2O. ROC analysis showed that SpO2 was more accurate (AUC 0.92, IC95% 0.87–0.97) than Crs (AUC 0.76, IC95% 0.87–0.97) and EELVCO2 (AUC 0.73, IC95% 0.64–0.82) to detect the lung’s closing pressure according to the change of PL,ee from positive to negative values. Compared to baseline ventilation with 8 cmH2O of PEEP, OLA increased EELVCO2 (1309 ± 517 vs. 2177 ± 679 mL) and decreased driving pressure (18.3 ± 2.2 vs. 10.1 ± 1.7 cmH2O), estimated shunt (17.7 ± 3.4 vs. 4.2 ± 1.4%), lung strain (0.39 ± 0.07 vs. 0.22 ± 0.06) and lung elastance (28.4 ± 5.8 vs. 15.3 ± 4.3 cmH2O/L), respectively; all p < 0.0001. The OLA strategy can be monitored using noninvasive variables during bariatric surgery. This strategy decreased lung strain, elastance and driving pressure compared with standard protective ventilatory settings.

Clinical trial number NTC03694665.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Aldenkortt M, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Brochard L, Tramer MR. Ventilation strategies in obese patients undergoing surgery: a quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:493–502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Behazin N, Jones SB, Cohen RI, Loring SH. Respiratory restriction and elevated pleural and esophageal pressures in morbid obesity. J Appl Physiol. 2010;108:212–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones RL, Nzekwu MM. The effects of body mass index on lung volumes. Chest. 2006;130:827–33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hedenstierna G, Santesson J. Breathing mechanics, dead space and gas exchange in the extremely obese, breathing spontaneously and during anaesthesia with intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1976;20:248–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sprung J, Whalley DG, Falcone T, Wilks W, Navratil JE, Bourke DL. The effects of tidal volume and respiratory rate on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopy in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:268–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pelosi P, Croci M, Ravagnan I. The effects of body mass on lung volumes, respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:654–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen NT, Wolfe BM. The physiologic effects of pneumoperotoneum in the morbidly obese. Ann Surg. 2005;241:219–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the world society of the abdominal compartment syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1190–206.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Joyce CJ, Williams AB. Kinetics of absorption atelectasis during anesthesia: a mathematical model. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86:1116–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kendale SM, Blitz JD. Increasing body mass index and the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia. J Clin Anaesth. 2016;33:97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gallagher SF, Haines KL, Osterlund LG, Mullen M, Downs JB. Postoperative hypoxemia: common, undetected and unsuspected after bariatric surgery. J Surg Res. 2010;159:622–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steinberg JM, Schiller HJ, Halter JM. Alveolar instability causes early ventilator-induced lung injury independent of neutrophils. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169:57–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsuchida S, Engelberts D, Peltekova V. Atelectasis causes alveolar injury in nonatelectatic lung regions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:279–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tusman G, Bohm SH, Warner DO, Sprung J. Atelectasis and perioperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012;25:1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Retamal J, Bergamini B, Carvalho AR. Non-lobar atelectasis generates inflammation and structural alveolar injury in the surrounding healthy tissue during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2014;18:505.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shenkman Z, Shir Y, Brodsky JB. Perioperative management of the obese patient. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:349–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelosi P, Ravagnan I, Giurati G. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1221–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S. Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:979–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P. Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1310–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chalhoub V, Yazigi A, Sleilaty G. Effect of vital capacity manoeuvres on arterial oxygenation in morbidly obese patients undergoing open bariatric surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007;24:283–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, Alhashemi JA. Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:862–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P. Noninvasive ventilation and alveolar recruitment maneuver improve respiratory function during and after intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:1354–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tusman G, Groisman I, Fiolo FE. Noninvasive monitoring of lung recruitment maneuvers in morbidly obese patients: the role of pulse oximetry and volumetric capnography. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:137–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Erlandsson K, Odenstedt H, Lundin S, Stenqvist O. Positive end-expiratory pressure optimization using electric impedance tomography in morbidly obese patients during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Acta Anaestesiol Scand. 2006;50:833–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Böhm SH, Maisch S, von Sandersleben A. Effects of lung recruitment on phase III slope of volumetric capnography in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:151–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eicher L, Truskowska K, Dupree A, Goetz AE, Zollner C. Intraoperative ventilation of morbidly obese patients guided by traspulmonary pressure. Obes Surg. 2018;28:122–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2095–104.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pirrone M, Fisher D, Chipman D. Recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure titration in morbidly obese ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:300–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marini JJ. Should we titrate positive end-expiratory pressure based on an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure? Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:391–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Fumagalli J, Berra L, Zhang C. Transpulmonary pressure describes lung morphology during decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trials in obesity. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1374–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sapsford DJ, Jones JG. The PIO2 vs SpO2 diagram: a non-invasive measurement of pulmonary oxygen exchange. Eur J Anaesth. 1995;12:375–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rowe L, Jones JG, Quine D, Bhushan SS, Stenson BJ. A simplified method for deriving shunt and reduced VA/Q in infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95:F47–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferrando C, Romero C, Tusman G. The accuracy of postoperative, non-invasive Air-Test to diagnose atelectasis in healthy patients after surgery: a prospective, diagnostic pilot study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015560.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gedeon A, Krill P, Osterlund B. Pulmonary blood flow (cardiac output) and the effective lung volume determined from a short breath hold using the differential Fick method. J Clin Monit. 2002;17:313–21.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Albu G, Wallin M, Hallbäck M. Comparison of static end-expiratory and effective lung volumes for gas exchange in healthy and surfactant-depleted lungs. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:101–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. González-López A, García-Prieto E, Batalla-Solís E. Lung strain and biological response in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:240–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Valenza F, Vagginelli F, Tiby A. Effects of the beach chair position, positive end-expiratory pressure, and pneumoperitoneum on respiratory function in morbidly obese patients during anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:725–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nestler C, Simon P, Petroff D. Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients during general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled clinical trial using electrical impedance tomography. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:1194–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam Burtz C. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:428–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hemmes SNT, Severgnini P, Jaber S. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (Provhilo trial): a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14),60416-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferrando C, Soro M, Unzueta C. Individualized perioperative open-lung approach versus standard protective ventilation in abdominal surgery (iPROVE): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:193–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Protti A, Andreis DT, Monti M. Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation: any difference between statics and dynamics? Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1046–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Amato MBP, Meade MO, Slutsky AS. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;37:747–55.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SNT, Barbas CSV. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:272–80.

    Google Scholar 

  45. The PROBESE Collaborative Group. Effect of intraoperative high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers vs low PEEP on postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.7505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yoshida T, Amato MBP, Grieco DL. Esophageal manometry and regional transpulmonary pressure in lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197:1018–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Support was provided from institutional sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerardo Tusman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Gerardo Tusman and Fernando Suarez Sipmann perform consultant services for Maquet Critical Care Matías Madorno who is partner and manager of MBMed S.A; a company that produce respiratory monitoring equipments. GT and FSS perform consultant services for Getinge/Maquet Critical Care.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participant included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tusman, G., Acosta, C.M., Ochoa, M. et al. Multimodal non-invasive monitoring to apply an open lung approach strategy in morbidly obese patients during bariatric surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 34, 1015–1024 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00405-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00405-w

Keywords

Navigation