Skip to main content

Reducing complexity in acid–base diagnosis - how far should we go?

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing volume 34, pages 17–20 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

To place in context the potential value of isolated plasma strong ion difference (SID) calculations and strong ion gap (SIG) calculations versus suggested cut-down versions such as SIDa adj and the BICgap respectively.

Methods

Stewart’s physical chemical approach is seen as a mathematical model of isolated plasma not displacing traditional Copenhagen and Boston approaches. Scanning tools for unmeasured ions based on the Principle of Electrical Neutrality such as the SIG and suggested cut-down versions such as the albumin adjusted anion gap and the BICgap are evaluated for accuracy and clinical usefulness.

Results

Plasma SID and abbreviations such as SIDa adj are not independent variables in vivo since they vary with PCO due to Gibbs Donnan ion traffic. They can also exhibit positive and negative bias, and SID values must be partnered with non-volatile weak acid concentrations when evaluating metabolic acid-base status. The BICgap calculation is a cut down version of the SIG fixed for pH 7.4. It includes phosphate but is otherwise similar in form to the albumin corrected anion gap, with similar sensitivity and specificity characteristics.

Conclusions

Clinicians are unlikely to find SID calculations or cut-down versions such as the SIDa adj clinically useful. The albumin corrected anion gap is in current use and easily determined by mental arithmetic from point of care anion gap printouts plus recent plasma albumin measurements. Any slight advantage of the BICgap would be offset by the complexity of its calculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Narins RG, Emmett M. Simple and mixed acid-base disorders: a practical approach. Medicine. 1980;59(3):161–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siggaard-Andersen O, Fogh-Andersen N. Base excess or buffer base (strong ion difference) as measure of a non-respiratory acid-base disturbance. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39:123–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schlichtig R, Grogono AW, Severinghaus JW. Human PaCO2 and standard base excess compensation for acid-base imbalance. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(7):1173–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Figge J, Jabor A, Kazda A, Fencl V. Anion gap and hypoalbuminemia. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(11):1807–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart PA. How to understand acid-base. A quantitative acid-base primer for biology and medicine. New York: Elsevier; 1981. p. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stewart PA. Modern quantitative acid-base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1983;61(12):1444–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart PA. Independent and dependent variables of acid-base control. Respir Physiol. 1978;33(1):9–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kellum JA. Clinical review: reunification of acid-base physiology. Crit Care. 2005;9(5):500–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan TJ. The Stewart approach–one clinician’s perspective. Clin Biochem Rev. 2009;30(2):41–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz I, Kraut J, Ornekian V, Nguyen MK. Acid-base analysis: a critique of the Stewart and bicarbonate-centered approaches. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294(5):F1009–31. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00475.2007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Figge J, Mydosh T, Fencl V. Serum proteins and acid-base equilibria: a follow-up. J Lab Clin Med. 1992;120(5):713–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan TJ. The meaning of acid-base abnormalities in the intensive care unit: part III—effects of fluid administration. Crit Care. 2005;9(2):204–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2946.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Cadringher P, Caironi P. Strong ion difference in urine: new perspectives in acid-base assessment. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):137. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc4890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yunos NM, Bellomo R, Story D, Kellum J. Bench-to-bedside review: Chloride in critical illness. Crit Care. 2010;14(4):226. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Langer T, Scotti E, Carlesso E, Protti A, Zani L, Chierichetti M, Caironi P, Gattinoni L. Electrolyte shifts across the artificial lung in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: interdependence between partial pressure of carbon dioxide and strong ion difference. J Crit Care. 2015;30(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolf MB, Deland EC. A comprehensive, computer-model-based approach for diagnosis and treatment of complex acid-base disorders in critically-ill patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25(6):353–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-011-9320-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan TJ, Vellaichamy M, Cowley DM, Weier SL, Venkatesh B, Jones MA. Equivalent metabolic acidosis with four colloids and saline on ex vivo haemodilution. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(3):407–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Agrafiotis M, Mpliamplias D, Papathanassiou M, Ampatzidou F, Drossos G. Comparison of a new simplified acid-base tool to the original Stewart-Figge approach: a study on cardiac surgical patients. J Anesth. 2018;32(4):499–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2503-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones NL. A quantitative physicochemical approach to acid-base physiology. Clin Biochem. 1990;23(3):189–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kellum JA, Kramer DJ, Pinsky MR. Strong ion gap: a methodology for exploring unexplained anions. J Crit Care. 1995;10(2):51–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Venkatesh B, Pilcher D, Prins J, Bellomo R, Morgan TJ, Bailey M. Incidence and outcome of adults with diabetic ketoacidosis admitted to ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):451. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1171-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Peterson CD, Collins AJ, Himes JM, Bullock ML, Keane WF. Ethylene glycol poisoning: pharmacokinetics during therapy with ethanol and hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 1981;304(1):21–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonda A, Gault H, Churchill D, Hollomby D. Hemodialysis for methanol intoxication. Am J Med. 1978;64(5):749–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kellum JA. Determinants of plasma acid-base balance. Crit Care Clin. 2005;21(2):329–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2005.01.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan TJ, Anstey CM, Wolf MB. A head to head evaluation of 8 biochemical scanning tools for unmeasured ions. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(2):449–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9861-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anstey CM. Estimating the net effect of unmeasured ions in human extracellular fluid using a new mathematical model. Part II: practical issues. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38(5):870–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Intensive Care Unit, Mater Health Services, Mater Research—University of Queensland, Stanley Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia

    Thomas J. Morgan

Authors
  1. Thomas J. Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Morgan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgan, T.J. Reducing complexity in acid–base diagnosis - how far should we go?. J Clin Monit Comput 34, 17–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00319-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00319-7

Keywords

  • Strong ion difference
  • Strong ion gap