Abstract
Following introduction of an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) at a tertiary care, academic health sciences centre, a quality assurance initiative was conducted to assess staff opinions of the AIMS using a previously published, anonymous survey tool at 1 and 5 years following AIMS introduction. At 5 years compared to 1 year after implementation of AIMS, the majority (18 of 24, 75%) of responses to the survey questions had a statistically significant change (P < 0.05) in the proportion of respondents favoring AIMS compared to the 1 year survey. Domains noted to be more favorable 5 years compared to 1 year after AIMS introduction included patient safety in the Operating Rooms and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, quality of handover and overall documentation, and communication amongst healthcare workers. The ideal time period at which to assess AIMS after introduction is not clear.
Reference
Eden A, Grach M, Goldik Z, Shnaider I, Lazarovici H, BarnettGriness O, Perel A, Pizov R. The implementation of an anesthesia information management system. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:882–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any commercial or non-commercial affiliations or conflicts of interest related to the manuscript. None of the authors have received consultancies related to the opinions or matters presented in the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pysyk, C.L., Jee, R. & Zunder, I. Change in staff anesthesiologists’ opinions of an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS). J Clin Monit Comput 33, 541–542 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0178-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0178-4