Abstract
Univent tube (UT) and EZ-blocker were used for one-lung ventilation (OLV). UT is a single lumen tube with a small separate lumen containing a bronchial blocker. EZ-blocker differs with its unique y-shaped double-cuffed distal end. We aimed to compare these two airway devices effects on airway pressures, oxygenation, ventilation and haemodynamics during OLV. Patients undergoing elective thoracotomy for the first time were included in this prospective randomized study. Patients were divided into two groups as UT and EZ. Bronchial blockers (BB) placement time was recorded. In lateral decubitus position, airway pressures, static compliance, tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR) and haemodynamic findings were recorded before inflating the BB cuff (Pre-OLV) and during OLV every 15 min. Arterial blood gas (ABG) samples were obtained before and during OLV. 70 patients were enrolled in the study. The demographic characteristics and data related to anesthesia and surgery were similar in both groups. It took longer to place EZ than UT (p = 0.02). Ppeak values were similar in both groups. Pplateau was significantly lower at the beginning of OLV (OLV15th min) and higher at the end of OLV (pre-DLV) in EZ group compared to UT (p = 0.01, p = 0.03). Cstatic were significantly higher at the beginning of OLV (OLV15th min) in EZ group compared to UT (p = 0.01). During the following measurements, Cstatic values were similar for both groups. Ventilation were achieved with similar TV and RR. ABG findings and haemodynamic variables were similar. EZ and Univent tube affected the airway pressures, oxygenation, ventilation and haemodynamic variables similarly during OLV in patients with normal respiratory function. These devices can be alternatives to each other based on clinical conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohen E. Back to blockers: the continued search for the ideal endobronchial blocker. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:490–03.
Inoue H, Shohtsu A, Ogawa J, Kawada S, Koide S. New device for one-lung anesthesia: endotracheal tube with movable blocker. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;83(6):940–41.
Magboul M. Review and new use for the Univent tube. Internet J Anesthesiol 5(4):1–3.
Mourisse J, Lerou J. Searching for the ideal endobronchial blocker. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(4):990.
Ruetzler K, Grubhofer G, Schmid W, Papp D, Nabecker S, Hutschala D, Lang G, Hager H. EZ-blocker for single lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(6):896–902.
Verelst PL, Van Zundert AA. Use of the EZ-blocker for lung separation. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25(2):161–62.
Marsh HM, Bishop ML. Factors affecting pulmonary compliance and airway resistance. In: Murray MJ, Harrison BA, Mueller JT, Rose SH, Wass CT, Wedel DJ, editors. Faust’s anesthesiology review. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2015, pp 28–58.
Doig GS, Simpson F. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care. 2005;20(2):187–91. (discussion 191–3).
Hoşten T, Topçu S. The importance of bronchoscopic anatomy for anesthesiologists. Tuberk Toraks. 2011;59(4):416–26.
Barnas GM, Stamenovic D, Lutchen KR. Lung and chest wall impedances in the dog in normal range of breathing: effects of pulmonary edema. J Appl Physiol. 1992;73(3):1040–46.
Barnas GM, Sprung J, Kahn R, Delaney PA, Agarwal M. Lung tissue and airway impedance during pulmonary edema in the normal range of breathing. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78:1889–9.
Dikmen Yalım. Solunum mekaniklerinin monitörizasyonu. Türk Yoğun Bakım Derneği Dergisi. 2006;4(2):11–3.
Michelet P, Roch A, Brousse D, D’Journo XB, Bregeon F, Lambert D, Perrin G, Papazian L, Thomas P, Carpentier JP, Auffray JP. Effects of PEEP on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during one-lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(2):267–73.
Schilling T, Kozian A, Huth C, Bühling F, Kretzschmar M, Welte T, Hachenberg T. The pulmonary immune effects of mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(4):957–65.
Boussarsar M, Thierry G, Jaber S, Roudot-Thoraval F, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Relationship between ventilatory settings and barotrauma in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(4):406–13.
MacIntyre NR. Setting the frequence-tidal volume pattern. Respir Care. 2002;47(3):266–74.
Benumof JL, Wahrenbrock EA. Blunted hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by increased lung vascular pressures. J Appl Physiol. 1975;38:846–50.
Campos JH. An update on bronchial blockers during lung separation techniques in adults. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(5):1266–74.
Baraka A. The Univent® tube can facilitate difficult intubation in a patient undergoing thoracoscopy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:693–4.
Dhamee MS. One-lung ventilation in a patient with a fresh tracheostomy using the tracheostomy tube and a Univent® endobronchial blocker. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11:124–5.
Matei A, Tommaso Bizzarri F, Preveggenti V, Mancini M, Vicchio M, Agnoletti V. EZ-blocker and one-lung ventilation via tracheostomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29:e32–e3.
Barrick BP, Kyle RW. Conduct of anesthesia; in anesthetic management of the general thoracic surgical patient. In: Shields TW, Cicero JL, Reed CE, Feins RH, editors. General thoracic surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. pp. 349–69.
Gayes JM. Pro: one-lung ventilation is best accomplished with the Univent endotracheal tube. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993;7(1):103–7.
Piccioni F, Vecchi I, Spinelli E, Previtali P, Langer M. J extraluminal EZ-blocker placement for one-lung ventilation in pediatric thoracic surgery. Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(6):e71–e3.
Benumof JL, Gaughan SUzuki GT. Operative lung constant positive airway pressure with the Univent bronchial blocker tube. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:406–10.
Calenda E, Baste JM, Bergis A, Hobeika S, Peillon C. Constant positive airway pressure easily connected to an EZ blocker channel. J Clin Anesth. 2016;28:92–4.
Moritz A, Schreiner W, Schmidt J. One-lung ventilation after rapid-sequence intubation: a novel approach using an ET View tracheostomy ventilation tube for placement of an EZ-blocker without bronchoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2016;29:48–9.
Inoue H, Shohtsu A, Ogawa J, Koide S, Kawada S. Endotracheal tube with movable blocker to prevent aspiration of intratracheal bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg. 1984;37:497–99.
Herenstein R, Russo JR, Moonka N, Capan LM. Management of one-lung anesthesia in an anticoagulated patient. Anesth Analg. 1988;67:1120.
Weng H, Xu ZY, Liu J, Ma D, Liu DS. Placement of the Univent tube without fiberoptic bronchoscope assistance. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:508–14.
Marasigan BL, Sheinbaum R, Hammer GB, Cohen E. Separation of the two lungs: double-lumen tubes, endobronchial blockers and endobronchial single-lumen tubes. In: Hagberg CA, editor Benumof and Hagberg’s airway management, 3rd ed. Philedelphia: Elsevier; 2013, p. 549.
Campos JH. Effects on oxygenation during selective lobar versus total lung collapse with or without continuous positive airway pressure. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:583–6.
Kus A, Gurkan Y, Hosten T, Akgul AG, Solak M, Toker K. Sequential lung isolation using a bronchial blocker (EZ-blocker) for bilateral dorsal sympathectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25:513–4.
Isil CT, Temel U, Oba S. Paediatric application of the EZ-blocker for thoracoscopic sympathectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:845–6.
Slinger PD, Lesiuk L. Flow resistances of disposable double-lumen, single-lumen, and Univent® tubes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12:142–4.
Acknowledgements
This study with project no KOÜ KAEK 2013/32 has been supported by Kocaeli University Scientific Research Projects Commission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors have declareted no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoşten, T., Aksu, C., Kuş, A. et al. Comparison of Univent tube and EZ blocker in one lung ventilation; airway pressures and gas exchange. J Clin Monit Comput 32, 327–333 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0028-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0028-9