Skip to main content

Ultrasonography in the preoperative difficult airway assessment

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing volume 31, pages 513–530 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

To evaluate the utility of ultrasound for detection of the difficult intubation in a preoperative setting. PubMed, Ovid, CINAHL Plus Full Text, and Google Scholar searches using [“difficult airway” OR “difficult intubation” OR “difficult laryngoscopy” OR “difficult ventilation”] AND [ultrasonography OR sonography OR ultrasound] without date limitations. Abstracts without publications, case reports, letters, textbooks, unrelated topics, or foreign language articles were excluded. Ancestry references were included from the reviewed articles. Two reviewers independently performed the query. Each study was reviewed using the STARD checklist to assess blinding, incomplete data reporting, subject attrition, and selection of appropriate statistical tests. Ten studies were included. All used convenience sampling of adult subjects requiring direct laryngoscopy in elective surgical settings. One study is retrospective and nine are prospective observational. Populations included non-obese, obese, pregnant, and thyroidectomy patients in the United States, Turkey, Israel, Canada, Portugal, and China. Airway locations scanned are variable using different protocols and patient positioning. The outcome variable is uniformly the Cormack–Lehane Grade. 114 of the 681 total subjects had difficult laryngoscopies. Significance for sonographic prediction of difficult laryngoscopy occurred at three locations: hyomental distance [52.6 ± 5.8 mm (p < 0.01)], anterior tissue at the hyoid bone [16.9 mm (95 % CI 11.9–21.9) and 15.9 ± 2.7 mm (p < 0.0001)], and the thyrohyoid membrane [34.7 mm (95 % CI 28.8–40.7) and 23.9 ± 3.4 mm (p < 0.0001) and 28.25 ± 4.43 mm (p < 0.001)]. The vocal cords and sternal notch levels have conflicting significance. Limitations include the heterogeneous populations and lack of standard scanning protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Cook TM, MacDougall-Davis SR. Complications and failure of airway management. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(suppl 1):i68–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rose DK, Cohen MM. The incidence of airway problems depends on the definition used. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43(1):30–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on management of the difficult airway. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2013;118(2):251–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T, Karmakar MK, Kee WDN. A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(6):1867–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lundstrøm LH, Møller AM, Rosenstock C, Astrup G, Wetterslev J. High body mass index is a weak predictor for difficult and failed tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 91,332 consecutive patients scheduled for direct laryngoscopy registered in the Danish anesthesia database. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2009;110(2):266–74.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39(11):1105–11.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adnet F, Racine SX, Borron SW, et al. A survey of tracheal intubation difficulty in the operating room: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(3):327–32.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook TM. A new practical classification of laryngeal view. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(3):274–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management—part 1: difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can J Anesth Can Anesth. 2013;60(11):1089–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management—part 2: the anticipated difficult airway. Can J Anesth Can Anesth. 2013;60(11):1119–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2005;103(2):429–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bannister F, Macbeth R. Direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. The Lancet. 1944;244(6325):651–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yentis SM. Predicting difficult intubation—Worthwhile exercise or pointless ritual? Anaesthesia. 2002;57(2):105.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lundstrøm LH, Vester-Andersen M, Møller AM, Charuluxananan S, L’hermite J, Wetterslev J. Poor prognostic value of the modified Mallampati score: a meta-analysis involving 177,088 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(5):659–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Randell T. Prediction of difficult intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40(82):1016–23.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baker PA, Depuydt A, Thompson JMD. Thyromental distance measurement—fingers don’t rule. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(8):878–82.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langeron O, Birenbaum A, Le Saché F, Raux M. Airway management in obese patient. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80(3):382–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Teoh WH, Kristensen MS. Utility of ultrasound in airway management. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2014;4(4):84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(5):456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Prasad A, Yu E, Wong DT, Karkhanis R, Gullane P, Chan VW. Comparison of sonography and computed tomography as imaging tools for assessment of airway structures. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(7):965–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Graumann O, Laursen CB. Ultrasonography for clinical decision-making and intervention in airway management: from the mouth to the lungs and pleurae. Insights Imaging. 2014;5(2):253–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lakhal K, Delplace X, Cottier J-P, et al. The feasibility of ultrasound to assess subglottic diameter. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(3):611–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wojtczak J, Bonadonna P. Pocket mobile smartphone system for the point-of-care submandibular ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(3):573–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chou EH, Dickman E, Tsou P-Y, et al. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015;90:97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deshpande R, Akhtar S, Haddadin AS. Utility of ultrasound in the ICU. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2014;27(2):123–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kristensen MS. Ultrasonography in the management of the airway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55(10):1155–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Terkawi AS, Karakitsos D, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Durieux ME. Ultrasound for the anesthesiologists: present and future. Sci World J. 2013;2013:1–15.

  28. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003;41(1):68–73.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Carlson M, Protsman L, Tomaka J. Graphic organizers can facilitate selection of statistical tests Part 1: analysis of group differences. J Phys Ther Educ. 2005;19(2):57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Protsman L, Carlson M. Graphic organizers can facilitate selection of statistical tests: part 2—correlation and regression analysis. J Phys Ther Educ. 2008;22(2):36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wojtczak JA. Submandibular sonography assessment of hyomental distances and ratio, tongue size, and floor of the mouth musculature using portable sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(4):523–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adhikari S, Zeger W, Schmier C, et al. Pilot study to determine the utility of point-of-care ultrasound in the assessment of difficult laryngoscopy. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(7):754–8. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01099.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gupta D, Srirajakalidindi A, Ittiara B, Apple L, Toshniwal G, Haber H. Ultrasonographic modification of Cormack Lehane classification for pre-anesthetic airway assessment. Middle East J Anesth. 2012;21:835–42.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hui CM, Tsui BC. Sublingual ultrasound as an assessment method for predicting difficult intubation: a pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(4):314–9. doi:10.1111/anae.12598.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Komatsu R, Sengupta P, Wadhwa A, Akça O. Ultrasound quantification of anterior soft tissue thickness fails to predict difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35(1):32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu J, Dong J, Ding Y, Zheng J. Role of anterior neck soft tissue quantifications by ultrasound in predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2014;20:2343.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ezri T, Gewürtz G, Sessler DI, et al. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients by ultrasound quantification of anterior neck soft tissue*. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(11):1111–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Meco BC, Alanoglu Z, Yilmaz AA, et al. Does ultrasonographic volume of the thyroid gland correlate with difficult intubation? An observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol Engl Ed. 2015;65(3):230–4. doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2014.06.004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Aydogmus M, Erkalp K, Sinikoglu SN, Usta TA, Ulger GO, Alagol A. Is ultrasonic investigation of transverse tracheal air shadow diameter reasonable for evaluation of difficult airway in pregnant women: a prospective comparative study. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;. doi:10.12669/pjms.301.3972.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pinto J, Cordeiro L, Pereira C, Gama R, Fernandes HL, Assunção J. Predicting difficult laryngoscopy using ultrasound measurement of distance from skin to epiglottis. J Crit Care. 2016;33:26–31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Naguib M, Scamman FL, O’Sullivan C, et al. Predictive performance of three multivariate difficult tracheal intubation models: a double-blind, case-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(3):818–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang J, Thornton JC, Russell M, Burastero S, Heymsfield S, Pierson RN. Asians have lower body mass index (BMI) but higher percent body fat than do whites: comparisons of anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;60(1):23–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Penning L. Radioanatomy of upper airways in flexion and retroflexion of the neck. Neuroradiology. 1988;30(1):17–21.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yentis SM, Lee DJH. Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1998;53(11):1041–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jabalameli M, Hashemi J, Mazoochi M. The effect of different Sellick’s maneuver on laryngoscopic view and intubation time. J Res Med Sci. 2005;10(5):285–7.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Benumof JL, Cooper SD. Quantitative improvement in laryngoscopic view by optimal external laryngeal manipulation. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8(2):136–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mosier JM, Sakles JC, Stolz U, et al. Neuromuscular blockade improves first-attempt success for intubation in the intensive care unit. A propensity matched analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(5):734–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the faculty of the United States Army Graduate Program in Anesthesia Nursing, as well as the staff of the Memphis Veterans Affairs Medical Center for their continuous and continued support in their academic endeavors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. United States Army Graduate Program of Anesthesia Nursing (USAGPAN), Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA

    Justin S. Fulkerson, Heather M. Moore, Tristan S. Anderson & Robert F. Lowe Jr.

  2. Veteran’s Health Administration Medical Center, Dallas VAMC, Dallas, TX, USA

    Justin S. Fulkerson

  3. Veteran’s Health Administration Medical Center, San Diego VAMC, San Diego, CA, USA

    Heather M. Moore

  4. Veteran’s Health Administration Medical Center, Temple VAMC, Temple, TX, USA

    Tristan S. Anderson

  5. Veteran’s Health Administration Medical Center, Denver VAMC, Denver, CO, USA

    Robert F. Lowe Jr.

Authors
  1. Justin S. Fulkerson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heather M. Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tristan S. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert F. Lowe Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin S. Fulkerson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fulkerson, J.S., Moore, H.M., Anderson, T.S. et al. Ultrasonography in the preoperative difficult airway assessment. J Clin Monit Comput 31, 513–530 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9888-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9888-7

Keywords

  • Airway management
  • Laryngoscopy
  • Ultrasonography