Skip to main content
Log in

Multicenter Evaluation of Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement by Bioreactance Technique

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript



Bioreactance, the analysis of intrabeat variations in phase of a transthoracic voltage in response to an applied high frequency transthoracic current, was recently introduced for noninvasive cardiac output measurement (NICOM). We evaluated NICOM compared to thermo- dilution (TD) in several clinical settings.


111 patients with a clinical indication for TD cardiac output (CO) measurement were recruited at five centers, including patients in cardiac catheterization laboratories, cardiac care units and intensive care units. CO measurements were made simulta- neously with TD and the bioreactance method and compared by regression analysis.


For studies in the intensive care units, TD-based CO and NICOM were highly correlated (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001) and did not differ significantly from each other (P = 0.55). Results in the cardiac catheterization laboratory were similar (r = 0.71, P < 0.001; P = 0.28 NICOM versus TD). In subsets of patients, NICOM was shown to be better corre- lated with TD-CO than CO obtained with the Fick method or with standard bioimpedance-based measurements of CO.


On average, compared to TD, bioreactance- based NICOM has acceptable accuracy in challenging clinical environments. Availability of such a tool may allow clinicians to have information about CO in patients where this information is not currently available to help diagnosis and guide therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Boldt J, Kling D, Thiel A, Hempelmann G. Non-invasive versus invasive cardiovascular monitoring. Determination of stroke volume and pulmonary hydration using a new bioimpedance monitor. Anaesthesist 1988; 37: 218–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubini A, Del MD, Catena V, et al. Cardiac output measurement by the thermodilution method: an in vitro test of accuracy of three commercially available automatic cardiac output computers. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21: 154–158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zollner C, Polasek J, Kilger E, et al. Evaluation of a new continuous thermodilution cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients: a prospective criterion standard study. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 293–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med 1966; 37: 1208–1212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Engoren M, Barbee D. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Am J Crit Care 2005; 14: 40–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leslie SJ, McKee S, Newby DE, Webb DJ, Denvir MA. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure. Blood Press Monit 2004; 9: 277–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 293: H583–H589.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 1191–1194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Squara P, Marque S, Cariou A, Chiche J. Non invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) compared to minimally invasive monitoring (VIGILEO) (abstr). Anesthesiology 2007; 107: A1527.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frezza EE, Mezghebe H. Indications and complications of arterial catheter use in surgical or medical intensive care units: analysis of 4932 patients. Am Surg 1998; 64: 127–131.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kac G, Durain E, Amrein C, Herisson E, Fiemeyer A, Buu-Hoi A. Colonization and infection of pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery patients: epidemiology and multivariate analysis of risk factors. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 971–975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gratz I, Kraidin J, Jacobi AG, deCastro NG, Spagna P, Larijani GE. Continuous noninvasive cardiac output as estimated from the pulse contour curve. J Clin Monit 1992; 8: 20–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Combes A, Berneau JB, Luyt CE, Trouillet JL. Estimation of left ventricular systolic function by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1377–1383.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Su NY, Huang CJ, Tsai P, Hsu YW, Hung YC, Cheng CR. Cardiac output measurement during cardiac surgery: esophageal Doppler versus pulmonary artery catheter. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2002; 40: 127–133.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dark PM, Singer M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 2060–2066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rocco M, Spadetta G, Morelli A, et al. A comparative evaluation of thermodilution and partial CO2 rebreathing techniques for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients during assisted ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 82–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Medin DL, Brown DT, Wesley R, Cunnion RE, Ognibene FP. Validation of continuous thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients with analysis of systematic errors. J Crit Care 1998; 13: 184–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Myers J, Gujja P, Neelagaru S, Burkhoff D. Cardiac output and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in heart failure: application of a new bio-reactance device. J Card Fail 2007; 13: 629–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziegeler S, Grundmann U, Fuerst O, Raddatz A, Kreuer S. Hemodynamic response to exercise as measured by the solar IKG impedance cardiography module and correlation with metabolic variables. J Clin Monit Comput 2007; 21: 13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown CV, Martin MJ, Shoemaker WC, et al. The effect of obesity on bioimpedance cardiac index. Am J Surg 2005; 189: 547–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirav Y. Raval MD.

Additional information

Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raval, N.Y., Squara, P., Cleman, M. et al. Multicenter Evaluation of Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement by Bioreactance Technique. J Clin Monit Comput 22, 113–119 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: