Abstract
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to develop an interactive software package of alarm sounds to present, recognize and share problems about alarm sounds among medical staff and medical manufactures. Methods. The alarm sounds were recorded in variable alarm conditions in a WAV file. The alarm conditions were arbitrarily induced by modifying attachments of various medical devices. The software package that integrated an alarm sound database and simulator was used to assess the ability to identify the monitor that sounded the alarm for the medical staff. Results. Eighty alarm sound files (40MB in total) were recorded from 41 medical devices made by 28 companies. There were three pairs of similar alarm sounds that could not easily be distinguished, two alarm sounds which had a different priority, either low or high. The alarm sound database was created in an Excel file (ASDB.xls 170 kB, 40 MB with photos), and included a list of file names that were hyperlinked to alarm sound files. An alarm sound simulator (AlmSS) was constructed with two modules for simultaneously playing alarm sound files and for designing new alarm sounds. The AlmSS was used in the assessing procedure to determine whether 19 clinical engineers could identify 13 alarm sounds only by their distinctive sounds. They were asked to choose from a list of devices and to rate the priority of each alarm. The overall correct identification rate of the alarm sounds was 48%, and six characteristic alarm sounds were correctly recognized by beetween 63% to 100% of the subjects. The overall recognition rate of the alarm sound priority was only 27%. Conclusions. We have developed an interactive software package of alarm sounds by integrating the database and the alarm sound simulator (URL: http://info.ahs.kitasato-u.ac.jp/tkweb/alarm/asdb.html). The AlmSS was useful for replaying multiple alarm sounds simultaneously and designing new alarm sounds interactively.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Kerr JH. Symposium on anaesthetic equipment. Warning devices. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 696–708.
Mondor TA, Finley GA. The perceived urgency of auditory warning alarms used in the hospital operating room is inappropriate. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 221–228.
Morris RW, Montano SR. Response times to visual and auditory alarms during anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996; 24: 682–684.
Kerr JH, Hayes B. An “alarming” situation in the intensive therapy unit. Intensive Care Med 1983; 9: 103–104.
Jenkins LC. The anaesthetic monitors. Can Anaesth Soc J 1984; 31: 294.
Stafford TJ. Whither monitoring? Crit Care Med 1982; 10: 792–795.
Meredith C, Edworthy J. Are there too many alarms in the intensive care unit? An overview of the problems. J Adv Nurs. 1995; 21; 15–20.
EN 475:1995 Medical devices-Electrically generated alarm signals.
Dain S. Current equipment alarm sounds: friend or foe? Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 209–214.
Schmidt SI, Baysinger CL. Alarms: help or hindrance? Anesthesiology 1986; 64:654–655.
Block FE Jr. Evaluation of users' abilities to recognize musical alarm tones. J Clin Monit 1992; 8: 285–290.
Cropp AJ, Woods LA, Raney D, Bredle DL. Name that tone. The proliferation of alarms in the intensive care unit. Chest. 1994; 105: 1217–1220.
Samuels AI. An alarming problem. Anesthesiology 1986; 64: 128.
Leob RG, Jones BR, Leonard RA, Behrman K. Recognition accuracy of current operating room alarms. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 499–505.
Weinger MB. Proposed new alarm standards may make a bad situation worse. Anesthesiology 1991; 74: 791–792.
Block FE Jr, Rouse JD, Hakala M, Thompson CL. A proposed new set of alarm sounds which satisfy standards and rationale to encode source information. J Clin Monit Comput 2000; 16: 541–546.
CAN/CSA-ISO 9703.2-97 Anaesthesia and respiratory care alarm signals - Part 2: auditory alarm signals. Can Standards Assoc 1997.
ISO/DIS 9703-2. Anaesthesia and respiratory care alarm signals - Part 2: Auditory alarm signals. Geneva 1993.
Weinger MB, Smith NT. Vigilance, alarms, and integrated monitoring systems. In Ehrenwerth J, Eisenkraft JB ed. Anesthesia equipment, principle and applications. Mosbey Yearbook Inc., 1993; 350–384.
BSI 2004 BS EN 60601-1-8:2004 Medical electrical equipment: part 1–8. General requirements for safety. BSI, London.
CENELEC 2004 EN 60601-1-8 Medical electrical equipment: part 1–8. General requirements for safety, CENELEC, Brussels.
Williams S, Beatty PC. Measuring the performance of audible alarms for anaesthesia. Physiol Meas 2005; 26: 571–581.
General Principle of Alarm Electrical Equipment (Japanese Industrial Standard T 1031–1991).
IEC 60601-1-8. Medical electrical equipment–Part 1–8: general requirements for safety–collateral standard: alarm systems–requirements, tests and guidelines–general requirements and guidelines for alarm systems in medical electrical equipment and in medical electrical systems. Final Draft International Standard Geneva June 2002.
Finley GA, Cohen AJ. Perceived urgency and the anaesthetist: responses to common operating room monitor alarms. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38: 958–964.
Momtahan K, Hetu R, Tansley B. Audibility and identification of auditory alarms in the operating room and intensive care unit. Ergonomics 1993, 36; 1159–1176.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takeuchi, A., Hirose, M., Shinbo, T. et al. Development of an Alarm Sound Database and Simulator. J Clin Monit Comput 20, 317–327 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-006-9037-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-006-9037-9