Abstract
Objective. Pulse-dye densitometry (PDD) could be a suitable, low-invasive alternative to thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) for monitoring cardiac output. The aim of our study was to assess the reproducibility and validity of PDD compared to PAC-thermodilution. Methods. In 43 post-cardiac surgery patients, the mean of triplicate readings of cardiac output was assessed using both methods. In a subgroup of 26 patients, a second set of measurements was obtained on average 2 h later. Results. Reproducibility of consecutive measurements was slightly better for PAC-thermodilution than for PDD (median coefficient of variation of the triplicate measurements: 3.5% versus 5.4%, P < 0.01). Both methods correlated well (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Using Bland and Altman analyses with PAC-thermodilution as the reference method, PDD showed a bias of −0.68 ± 0.82 L/min, mainly due to differences in higher ranges of cardiac output (>6.5 L/min). Measured changes in cardiac output were 81% concordant (i.e. <1 L/min different) between both methods. Conclusion. PDD correlates well with PAC-thermodilution and thus deserves consideration as a low-invasive alternative for measurement and follow-up of cardiac output.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyd KD, Thomas SJ, Gold J, Boyd AD. A prospective study of complications of pulmonary artery catheterizations in 500 consecutive patients. Chest 1983; 84: 245–249.
Sibbald WJ, Sprung CL. The pulmonary artery catheter. The debate continues. Chest 1988; 94: 899–901.
Aoyagi T, Miyasaka K. The theory and applications of pulse spectrophotometry. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: S93–S95.
Bremer F, Schiele A, Tschaikowsky K. Cardiac output measurement by pulse-dye densitometry: A comparison with the Fick's principle and thermodilution method. Intens Care Med 2002; 399–405.
Hofer CK, Buhlmann S, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Pulsed dye densitometry with two different sensor types for cardiac output measurement after cardiac surgery: A comparison with the thermodilution technique. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 653–657.
Lijima T. Cardiac output and circulating blood volume analysis by pulse dye-densitometry. J Clin Monit 1997; 13: 81–89.
Imai T, Takahashi K, Fukura H, Morishita Y. Measurement of cardiac output by pulse dye densitometry using indocyanine green: A comparison with the thermodilution method. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 816–822.
Sakka SG, Reinhart K, Wegscheider K, Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison of cardiac output and circulatory blood volumes by transpulmonary thermo-dye dilution and transcutaneous indocyanine green measurement in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 121: 559–565.
Groeneveld ABJ, Berendsen RR, Schneider AJ, Pneumatikos IA, Stokkel LA, Thijs LG. Effect of the mechanical ventilatory cycle on thermodilution right ventricular volumes and cardiac output. Journal of Applied Physiology 2000; 89: 89–96.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.
Dhingra VK, Fenwick JC, Walley KR, Chittock DR, Ronco JJ. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 122: 990–997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kroon, M., Groeneveld, A.B.J. & Smulders, Y.M. Cardiac Output Measurement by Pulse Dye Densitometry: Comparison with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution in Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients. J Clin Monit Comput 19, 395–399 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-005-6865-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-005-6865-y