Abstract
Formation of pure gaseous water cluster in the supersonic gas flow from a conical nozzle was investigated by simulation. The simulation results show that average size of water cluster indicates a different size evolution along the gas flow, i.e., the average cluster size firstly increases to a maximum size and then decreases slowly, rather than keeps increasing like other gases. By further calculations of the nucleation rate and the growth rate of water cluster, it is found that the decrease of average size results from a high nucleation rate and a low size growth rate in the downstream of gas flow far away from conical nozzle throat.
Graphic Abstract
Formation of pure gaseous water cluster in the supersonic gas flow from a conical nozzle was investigated by simulation. The simulation results show that average size of water cluster indicates a different size evolution along the gas flow, i.e., the average cluster size firstly increases to a maximum size and then decreases slowly, rather than keeps increasing like other gases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. Ditmire, J. Zweiback, V. P. Yanovsky, T. E. Cowan, G. Hays, and K. B. Wharton (1999). Nature 398, 489.
I. Last and J. Jortner (2001). Phys. Rev. A 64, 063201.
K. W. Madison, P. K. Patel, D. Price, A. Edens, M. Allen, T. E. Cowan, J. Zweiback, and T. Ditmire (2004). Phys. Plasmas 11, 270.
R. A. Smith, T. Ditmire, and J. W. G. Tisch (1998). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 3798.
Z. Chen, M. Li, M. Zhou, D. Liu, G. Qu, Y. Wang, and J. Han (2019). J. Fusion Energ. 38, 228.
Hong Yu Li, Mei Dong Huang, Ming Kang, and De Jun Li (2018). Chin. Phys. B 27, 063602.
S. Ter-Avetisyan, M. Schnürer, D. Hilscher, U. Jahnke, S. Busch, P. V. Nickles, and W. Sandner (2005). Phys. Plasmas 12, 012702.
V. Kumarappan, M. Krishnamurthy, and D. Mathur (2003). Phys. Rev. A 67, 063207.
S. Grieser, B. Aurand, E. Aktan, D. Bonaventura, M. Büscher, M. Cerchez, I. Engin, L. Leßmann, C. Mannweiler, R. Prasad, O. Willi, and A. Khoukaz (2019). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 043301.
Lu Haiyang, Guanglong Chen, Guoquan Ni, Ruxin Li, and Xu Zhizhan (2010). J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 2.
M. Ahmed, C. J. Apps, C. Hughes, and J. C. Whitehead (1994). J. Phys. Chem. 98, 12530.
C. Bobbert, S. Schutte, C. Steinbach, and U. Buck (2002). Eur. Phys. J. D 19, 183.
J. Harnes, M. Winkler, A. Lindblad, L. J. Sæthre, and K. J. Børve (2011). J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 10408.
Fu Pengtao, Jifeng Han, Yanhong Mou, Dan Han, and Chaowen Yang (2011). Acta Phys. Sin. 60, 053602.
K. C. Gupta, N. Jha, P. Deb, D. R. Mishra, and J. K. Fuloria (2015). J. Appl. Phys. 118, 114308.
N. G. Korobeishchikov, M. A. Roenko, and G. I. Tarantsev (2017). J. Clust. Sci. 28, 2529.
F. Dorchies, F. Blasco, T. Caillaud, J. Stevefelt, C. Stenz, A. S. Boldarev, and V. A. Gasilov (2003). Phys. Rev. A 68, 023201.
S. Jinno, Y. Fukuda, H. Sakaki, A. Yogo, M. Kanasaki, K. Kondo, A. Y. Faenov, I. Y. Skobelev, T. A. Pikuz, A. S. Boldarev, and V. A. Gasilov (2013). Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 164103.
Xu Yi, A. S. Boldarev, Dong Eon Kim, and Guanglong Chen (2015). Acta Phys. Sin. 64, 013601.
J. Nejdl, J. Vanˇcura, K. Boháˇcek, M. Albrecht, and U. Chaulagain (2019). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 065107.
N. Gimelshein, S. Gimelshein, C. C. Pradzynski, T. Zeuch, and U. Buck (2015). J. Chem. Phys. 142, 244305.
Udo Buck, Christoph C. Pradzynski, Thomas Zeuch, Johannes M. Dieterichc, and Bernd Hartkec (2014). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 6859.
M. Kulmala (2003). Science 302, 1000.
L. Delzeit, D. Blake, and J. Geophys (2001). Res. Planets 33, 379.
G. Chen, A. S. Boldarev, X. Li, Y. Cao, J. He, and D. E. Kim (2018). J. Appl. Phys. 124, 035902.
O. F. Hagena and W. Obert (1972). J. Chem. Phys. 56, 1793.
O. F. Hagena (1981). Surf. Sci. 106, 101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, M., Boldarev, A.S., Li, X. et al. Different Average Size Evolution of Gaseous Water Cluster in an Expanding Gas Flow. J Clust Sci 32, 1223–1228 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-020-01887-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-020-01887-4