Abstract
The effects of long-term preservation on flow cytometric parameters of natural oceanic populations of pico-and nanophytoplankton have been examined. Populations collected at oligotrophic subtropical and subarctic locations in the North Pacific were fixed with glutaraldehyde and frozen in liquid nitrogen, according to Vaulot et al. (1989). During six months’ storage, chlorophyll red fluorescence declined in all the groups examined, while forward light scatter was enhanced in Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus, and weakened in nanoeucaryotes. Cell loss was not significant except for Synechococcus. Caution is required when analyzing flow cytometric data of samples stored for more than a month.
References
Ackleson, S. G. and R. W. Spinrad (1988): Size and refractive index of individual marine particles: a flow cytometric approach. Appl. Opt., 27, 1270–1277.
Brussaard, C. P. D., D. Marie, R. Thyrhaug and G. Bratbak (2001): Flow cytometric analysis of phytoplankton viability following viral infection. Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 26, 157–166.
Campbell, L. and D. Vaulot (1993): Photosynthetic picoplankton community structure in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean near Hawaii (station ALOHA). Deep-Sea Res. I, 40, 2043–2060.
Cavender-Bares, K. K. (1999): Size distributions, population dynamics, and single-cell properties of marine plankton in diverse nutrient environments. Ph.D Thesis of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Choi, J. W. and D. K. Stoecker (1989): Effects of fixation on cell volume of marine planktonic protozoa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 55, 1761–1765.
Cucci, T. L. and M. E. Sieracki (2001): Effects of mismatched refractive indices in aquatic flow cytometry. Cytometry, 44, 173–178.
Lepesteur, M., J. M. Martin and A. Fleury (1993): A comparative study of different preservation methods for phytoplankton cell analysis by flow cytometry. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 93, 55–63.
Marie, D., F. Partensky, D. Vaulot and S. Brussaard (1999): Enumeration of phytoplankton, bacteria, and viruses in marine samples. In Current Protocols in Cytometry Supplement 10, ed. by J. P. Robinson, Z. Darzynkiewicz, P. N. Dean, A. Orfao, P. S. Rabinovitch, C. C. Stewart, H. J. Tanke, L. L. Wheeless and L. G. Dressier, Wiley, New York.
Neale, P. J., J. J. Cullen and C. A. Yentsch (1989): Bio-optical inferences from chlorophyll a fluorescence: What kind of fluorescence is measured in flow cytometry? Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1739–1748.
Paau, A. S., J. Oro and J. R. Cowles (1978): Application of microfluorometry to the study of algal cells and isolated chloroplasts. J. Exp. Botany, 29, 1011–1020.
Pan, L. A., L. H. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. M. Gasol and M. Chao (2005): On-board flow cytometric observation of picoplankton community structure in the East China Sea during the fall of different years. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 52, 243–253.
Troussellier, M., C. Courties and S. Zettelmaier (1995): Flow cytometric analysis of coastal lagoon bacterioplankton and picophytoplankton: fixation and storage effects. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 40, 621–633.
Vaulot, D., C. Courties and F. Partensky (1989): A simple method to preserve oceanic phytoplankton for flow cytometric analyses. Cytometry, 10, 629–635.
Veldhuis, M. J. W. and G. W. Kraay (2000): Application of flow cytometry in marine phytoplankton research: current applications and future perspectives. Sci. Mar., 64, 121–134.
Veldhuis, M. J. W., G. W. Kraay and K. R. Timmermans (2001): Cell death in phytoplankton: correlation between changes in membrane permeability, photosynthetic activity, pigmentation and growth. Eur. J. Phycol., 36, 167–177.
Verity, P. G., C. Y. Robertson, C. R. Tronzo, M. G. Andrews, J. R. Nelson and M. E. Sieracki (1992): Relationships between cell volume and the carbon and nitrogen content of marine photosynthetic nanoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 1434–1446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, M., Takeda, S. & Furuya, K. Effects of long-term sample preservation on flow cytometric analysis of natural populations of pico-and nanophytoplankton. J Oceanogr 62, 903–908 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-006-0107-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-006-0107-x