The Power of Doing: How Job Crafting Transmits the Beneficial Impact of Autonomy Among Overqualified Employees
- 143 Downloads
Overqualified individuals have more experience, KSAs (knowledge, skills, abilities), and/or education than what is needed in their job. Prior research has identified autonomy as a work characteristic that helps individuals deal with overqualification; yet, it remains unclear as to why this is the case. The goal of the present study was to identify the mechanism through which autonomy exerts its beneficial impact. Drawing on the literatures of person-environment fit and proactivity, we first hypothesized that, in addition to autonomy, job crafting likewise moderates the relationship between overqualification and both withdrawal and turnover intention as central outcomes. Job crafting denotes a proactive type of behavior whereby individuals change the boundaries of their jobs. Next, we hypothesized that job crafting is positively related to autonomy, and that job crafting represents the key mechanism through which autonomy moderates the overqualification-outcome relationship. In a multisource sample of 226 employee-supervisor dyads, we found that overqualified employees were significantly more likely to withdraw from their work and intend to exit if (a) their job provided little autonomy or (b) if they engaged in low levels of job crafting. When individuals experienced high levels of autonomy or engaged in high levels of job crafting, the overqualification-outcome relationship was reversed (or non-significant). Moreover, autonomy was positively related to job crafting. Finally, we found evidence for mediated moderation, such that the moderating effect of autonomy on the relationship between overqualification and both withdrawal and turnover intention was transmitted through job crafting. We discuss theoretical and practical implications.
KeywordsOverqualification Job crafting Autonomy Job design
We thank Tamara Berrino and Sandra German for their help with data collection.
This work was supported by a grant from the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds [Swiss National Science Foundation, grant number 100019-156537] awarded to Maike E. Debus.
- Baillod, J., & Semmer, N. (1994). Fluktuation und Berufsverläufe bei Computerfachleuten [turnover and career paths of computer specialists]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 38(4), 152–163.Google Scholar
- Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2010). Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. In S. Zedeck, H. Aguinis, W. Cascio, M. Gelfand, K. Leong, S. Parker, & J. Zhou (Eds.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 51–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2008). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 328–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Van Harrison, R. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Edwards, J. R., Cable, D. M., Williamson, I. O., Lambert, L. S., & Shipp, A. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Peiró, J. M., & Truxillo, D. M. (2011). Overqualified employees: Making the best of a potentially bad situation for individuals and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01330.x.
- Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. (2017). Language—facts and figures. Retrieved from https://www.eda.admin.ch/aboutswitzerland/en/home/gesellschaft/sprachen/die-sprachen%2D%2D-fakten-und-zahlen.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2019.
- French, J. R. P., Jr., Caplan, R. D., & Van Harrison, R. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs. subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375–411). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2007). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hui, C., Wong, A., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Turnover intention and performance in China: The role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X171037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Liu, D., Zhang, Z., & Wang, M. (2012). Mono-level and multilevel mediated moderation and moderated mediation: Theorization and test. In X. Chen, A. S. Tsui, & J. L. Farh (Eds.), Empirical methods in organization and management research (pp. 553–587). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
- Perrewé, P. L., & Zellars, K. L. (1999). An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1379%28199909%2920:5%3C739::AID-JOB1949%3E3.0.CO;2-C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Randstad. (2012). Skills mismatches and finding the right talent (incl. quarterly mobility, confidence, and job satisfaction). Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/19445179-Skills-mismatches-finding-the-right-talent-incl-quarterly-mobility-confidencejob-satisfaction.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2019.
- Reh, F. J. (2018). Learn about the cost of high employee turnover. Retrieved from https://www.thebalancecareers.com/the-high-cost-of-high-employee-turnover-2276010. Accessed 31 Jan 2019.
- Semmer, N. K. (1984). Stressbezogene Tätigkeitsanalyse [Stress-oriented task analysis]. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
- Semmer, N. K., Grebner, S., & Elfering, A. (2004). Beyond self-report: Using observational, physiological, and situation-based measures in research on occupational stress. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 3: Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies) (pp. 207–263). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: JAI.Google Scholar
- Solutions, L. T. (2015). Why & how people change jobs. Mountain View, CA: Author.Google Scholar
- Spector, P. E. (1992). A consideration of the validity and meaning of self-report measures of job conditions. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 123–151). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Spector, P. E., Zapf, D., Chen, P. Y., & Frese, M. (2000). Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200002)21:1<79::AID-JOB964>3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Staufenbiel, T., & König, C. J. (2011). An evaluation of Borg’s cognitive and affective job insecurity scales. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(20), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Van Harrison, R. (1978). Person-environment fit and job stress. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 175–205). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wrzesniewski, A., Bartel, C. A., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (in preparation). Remoteness as a resource: The impact of virtual work on job crafting. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar