Skip to main content
Log in

Popularity Procurement and Pay Off: Antecedents and Consequences of Popularity in the Workplace

Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines agreeableness and work knowledge as predictors of employees’ popularity above and beyond core self-evaluation (CSE), and the moderating role of these constructs on the CSE–popularity relationship. We also investigate popularity’s effects on supervisor-rated task performance and promotion potential, and the conditional indirect effects of CSE on these outcomes via popularity.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Multi-source data were collected from 213 employees, their coworkers, and direct supervisors in a Chinese mine trading company.

Findings

Agreeableness predicted popularity above and beyond CSE and moderated the CSE–popularity relationship, although the direct and moderating effects of work knowledge were nonsignificant. Popularity positively influenced performance ratings but not promotion potential. Results also supported conditional indirect effects of CSE on performance ratings via popularity.

Implications

The current findings underscore the importance of examining workplace popularity. Discovering agreeableness as an additional predictor of popularity and its moderation effects on the CSE–popularity link suggests that communal qualities are important for employees’ attainment of popularity. The discussion also focuses on expanding the scope of workplace popularity to include performance-related outcomes. Lastly, this study considers how employee characteristics connect to performance ratings through popularity.

Originality/Value

Workplace popularity is relatively unexplored but has tremendous organizational implications. This research advances the understanding of how to attain workplace popularity and the boundary conditions for the relationship between CSE and popularity. It also extends consequences associated with workplace popularity beyond interpersonal outcomes and assesses the role of popularity, a construct rooted in collective perception, in explaining links between employee characteristics and performance-related outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The big two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61–62. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43–51. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1962). Further evidence on the dynamic character of criteria. Personnel Psychology, 15, 93–97. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1962.tb01850.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567. doi:10.2307/257068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhal, K. T., Bhaskar, A. U., & Ratnam, C. V. (2009). Employee reactions to M&A: Role of LMX and leader communication. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30, 604–624. doi:10.1108/01437730910991637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Core self-evaluations: A review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 5–18. doi:10.1002/per.481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143. doi:10.1002/ejsp.744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1981). Cross-cultural encounters: Face-to-face interaction (Vol. 94). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butovskaya, M. L., Timentschik, V. M., & Burkova, V. N. (2007). Aggression, conflict resolution, popularity, and attitude to school in Russian adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 170–183. doi:10.1002/ab.20197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, A., & Choi, J. (2006). The effects of cognitive appraisal and emotion on social motive and negotiation behavior: The critical role of agency of negotiator emotion. Human Performance, 19, 305–325. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1904_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Sun, Y. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 63, 1336–1343. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01698.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. R., Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (2003). When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 1–21. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00062-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cislak, A., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1103–1110. doi:10.1002/ejsp.554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed, P. A., Lehmann, K., & Hood, M. (2009). The relationship between core self-evaluations, employment commitment and well-being in the unemployed. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 310–315. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A., Fiske, S., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). Impression formation and cooperative behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 305–328. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<305::AID-EJSP929>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, E. N. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). What people look for in others: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on information selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 206–219. doi:10.1177/0146167200264007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, A., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations to goal setting, motivation, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1270–1279. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, M., Brown, J., & Lee, F. (1995). Who gets the credit? Perceptions of idiosyncrasy credit in work groups. Small Group Research, 26, 56–76. doi:10.1177/1046496495261003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Perrewé, P. L., Anthony, W. P., & Gilmore, D. C. (2000). Political skills at work. Organizational Dynamics, 28, 25–37. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(00)00007-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from the perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • French, D. C., Niu, L., & Purwono, U. (2015). Popularity of Indonesian adolescents: Do the findings from the USA generalize to a Muslim majority developing country? Social Development, 25, 405–421. doi:10.1111/sode.12148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). Doing good buffers against feeling bad: Prosocial impact compensates for negative task and self-evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). I won’t let you down… or will I? Core self-evaluations, other-orientation, anticipated guilt and gratitude, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 108–121. doi:10.1037/a0017974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (2006). An examination of temporal variables and relationship quality on promotability ratings. Group & Organization Management, 31, 677–699. doi:10.1177/1059601106286889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117–127. doi:10.1037/h0042501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (2006). Influence processes in leadership-followership: Inclusion and the idiosyncrasy credit model. In D. A. Hantula (Ed.), Advances in social & organizational psychology: A tribute to Ralph Rosnow (pp. 293–312). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmarinen, V. J., Vainikainen, M. P., Verkasalo, M., & Lönnqvist, J. E. (2015). Why are extraverts more popular? Oral fluency mediates the effect of extraversion on popularity in middle childhood. European Journal of Personality, 29, 138–151. doi:10.1002/per.1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). r wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2005). The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority’s fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 363–372. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Hurst, C. (2008). How the rich (and happy) get richer (and happier): Relationship of core self-evaluations to trajectories in attaining work success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 849–863. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2011). Happiness as a societal value. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 30–41. doi:10.5465/AMP.2011.59198447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core-evaluations approach. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 19, pp. 151–188). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2013). Work in the 21 st century, binder ready version: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Lansu, T. A., & Cillessen, A. H. (2012). Peer status in emerging adulthood: Associations of popularity and preference with social roles and behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27, 132–150. doi:10.1177/0743558411402341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Xie, H., & Shi, J. (2012). Chinese and American children’s perceptions of popularity determinants: Cultural differences and behavioral correlates. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 420–429. doi:10.1177/0165025412446393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, D., Scholte, R. H. J., Cillessen, A. H. N., Nijenhuis, J. T., & Segers, E. (2010). Classroom ratings of likeability and popularity are related to the big five and the general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 669–672. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R., & Liden, R. C. (1982). The effects of the social context on performance evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 241–256. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(82)90258-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617–635. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. (2013). The “hard” science of studying and developing “soft” leader skills. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, B. A. (2013). A conceptual framework for the study of popularity in the workplace. Organizational Psychology Review, 3, 161–186. doi:10.1177/2041386612464092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 20–33. doi:10.1037/a0012951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/.

  • Shapiro, D. L., Boss, A. D., Salas, S., Tangirala, S., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2011). When are transgressing leaders punitively judged? An empirical test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 412–422. doi:10.1037/a0021442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., Johnson, R. E., Liu, Y., & Wang, M. (2013). Linking subordinate political skill to supervisor dependence and reward recommendations: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 374–384. doi:10.1037/a0031129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Okagaki, L. (1993). Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge in work and at school. In J.M. Puckett, H.W. Reese (Eds.), Mechanisms of everyday cognition (pp. 205–227). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopfer, J. M., Egloff, B., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2013). Being popular in online social networks: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 592–598. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zelst, R. H. (1951). Worker popularity and job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 4, 405–412. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1951.tb00981.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2005). Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 282–296. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.16928408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, H. M. (1978). Social learning of work values in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 711–718. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojciszke, B., & Szymków, A. (2003). Emotions related to others’ competence and morality. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 34, 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1245–1257. doi:10.1177/01461672982412001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No. 31671121.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Yao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garden, R., Hu, X., Zhan, Y. et al. Popularity Procurement and Pay Off: Antecedents and Consequences of Popularity in the Workplace. J Bus Psychol 33, 297–310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9494-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9494-9

Keywords

Navigation