It’s the Base: Why Displaying Anger Instead of Sadness Might Increase Leaders’ Perceived Power but Worsen Their Leadership Outcomes
- 1.4k Downloads
Although research has shown that anger displays lead to more perceived power than sadness displays, sadness displays often result in more positive leadership outcomes than anger displays. Aiming to explain this discrepancy, we examine the specific power bases that are inferred from leaders’ anger versus sadness displays as potential explanatory mechanisms.
We conducted three experimental studies, replicating results with students and working adults and with different induction methods.
Our results indicate that the discrepancy between the effects of anger and sadness displays on power ascriptions and leadership outcomes can be explained by divergent power bases ascribed to angry versus sad leaders. Whereas more position (i.e., legitimate, reward and coercive) power was ascribed to angry leaders than to sad leaders, sad leaders were viewed as possessing more personal (i.e., referent) power than angry leaders. Moreover, while angry leaders’ higher legitimate power was positively related to leaders’ perceived effectiveness and follower loyalty, both enhanced coercive and reduced referent power were negatively related to these outcomes and positively related to leader-directed deviance.
Although previous literature suggests that displaying anger instead of sadness might be functional for leaders’ power, our findings aim to make leaders aware of the specific types of power they gain in followers’ eyes when displaying anger versus sadness.
By examining the power bases ascribed to angry versus sad leaders, our study reconciles inconsistent findings and elucidates the foundation on which angry versus sad leaders’ capacity to influence followers is built.
KeywordsLeader anger Leader sadness Power bases Emotions as social information Follower inferences
- Basch, J., & Fisher, C. D. (2000). Affective events–emotions matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. E. J. Härtel, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 36–48). Westport: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
- Bass, B. M. (1960). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Clark, C. (1990). Emotion and micropolitics in everyday life: Some patterns and paradoxes of place. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 305–333). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Facial action coding system: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 150–167). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gibson, D. E., & Schroeder, S. (2002). Grinning, frowning, and emotionless: Agent perceptions of power and their effect on felt and displayed emotions in influence attempts. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Hartel, & W. Zerbe (Eds.), Managing emotions in the workplace (pp. 184–211). Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 39–60. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lelieveld, G.-J., Van Dijk, E., Van Beest, I., Steinel, W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). Disappointed in you, angry about your offer: Distinct negative emotions induce concessions via different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 635–641. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lewis, K. M. (2000). When leaders display emotion: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 221–234. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2%3C221::AID-JOB36%3E3.3.CO;2-S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lord, R., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Unwin-Everyman.Google Scholar
- Martorana, P. V., Galinsky, A. D., & Rao, H. (2005). From system justification to system condemnation: Antecedents of attempts to change status hierarchies. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & M. T. Hunt (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Vol. 7. Status and groups (pp. 283–313). Greenwich: JAI Press. doi: 10.1016/S1534-0856(05)07012-X.Google Scholar
- Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107–142. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2010). On angry leaders and agreeable followers: How leaders’ emotions and followers’ personalities shape motivation and team performance. Psychological Science, 21, 1827–1834. doi: 10.1177/0956797610387438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 562–580. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Visser, V. A., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & Wisse, B. (2013). How leader displays of happiness and sadness influence follower performance: Emotional contagion and creative versus analytical performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 172–188. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar