Skip to main content
Log in

Differential Effects of Task Performance, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Job Complexity on Voluntary Turnover

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance–turnover relationship by considering the effects of task performance and OCBs simultaneously while also examining the moderating effect job complexity has on the relationship between voluntary turnover and each type of performance.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were obtained as part of a larger study to validate an employment test, in which actual turnover data and supervisory ratings of job performance were collected for employees in two hospitals (n = 782).

Findings

Task performance exhibited a curvilinear relationship with turnover, while OCB exhibited a negative linear relationship with turnover. Job complexity moderated both of these relationships. For task performance, turnover in high-complexity jobs was greater for low performers but lower for high performers relative to that of employees in low-complexity jobs. For OCB, the negative relationship with turnover was more pronounced in high-complexity jobs.

Implications

Both low- and high-task performers are more likely to turnover, while employees exhibiting high OCBs are less likely to turnover. These results imply that retention strategies are critical for top performers, but especially in high-complexity jobs. Organizations may be able to discourage voluntary turnover by creating conditions that stimulate OCB, particularly in highly complex jobs.

Originality/Value

Most prior performance–turnover relationship research used unidimensional measures of performance, whereas this study included two dimensions of performance and examined this relationship while controlling for one-performance dimension when predicting the other. Furthermore, this study is one of the first studies to suggest that job complexity moderates the performance–turnover relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2012). Using performance management to win the talent war. Business Horizons, 55, 609–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., O’Boyle, E., Gonzalez-Mulé, E., & Joo, H. (2016). Cumulative advantage: Conductors and insulators of heavy-tailed productivity distributions and productivity stars. Personnel Psychology. doi:10.1111/peps.12095.

  • Aguinis, H., & O’Boyle, E. (2014). Star performers in twenty-first century organizations. Personnel Psychology, 67, 313–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C., & Vardaman, J. M. (2010). Retaining talent: Replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 48–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. G., & Griffeth, R. W. (1999). Job performance and turnover: A review and integrative multi-route model. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. G., & Griffeth, R. W. (2001). Test of a mediated performance-turnover relationship highlighting the moderating roles of visibility and reward contingency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1014–1021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Waldman, D. A., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Age and work performance in nonmanagerial jobs: The effects of experience and occupational type. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becton, J. B., Carr, J., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Is the past prologue for some more than others? The hobo syndrome and job complexity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 448–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39, 958–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.

  • Bolino, M. C., Harvey, J., & Bachrach, D. G. (2012). A self-regulation approach to understanding citizenship behavior in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119, 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27, 505–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (Vol. 71, pp. 71–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Pierce, J. L., & Crossley, C. (2014). Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 318–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. P., Holtom, B. C., Sablynski, C. J., Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2010). The buffering effects of job embeddedness on negative shocks. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capron, L., & Chatain, O. (2008). Competitors’ resource-oriented strategies: Acting on competitors’ resources through interventions in factor markets and political markets. Academy of Management Review, 33, 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F. (2003). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. P., Hui, C., & Sego, D. J. (1998). The role of organizational citizenship behavior in turnover: Conceptualization and preliminary tests of key hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 922–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung-Yan, G. A. (2010). The nonlinear effects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover, and psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 237–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, E., & Holladay, C. (2015). Intervening mechanisms between personality and turnover: Mediator and suppressor effects. Journal of Business and Personality, 30, 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 960–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual review of sociology, 2, 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassina, N. E., Jones, D. A., & Uggerslev, K. L. (2008). Relationship clean-up time: Using meta-analysis and path analysis to clarify relationships among job satisfaction, perceived fairness, and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Blass, F. R., Douglas, C., & Kolodinsky, R. W. (2003). Personal reputation in organizations. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 211–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2007). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1084–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, T. M. (2002). In the trenches at the talent wars: Competitive interaction for scarce human resources. Human Resource Management, 41, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart, B. (1990). Voluntary turnover and alternative job opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausknecht, J. P., Rodda, J., & Howard, M. J. (2009). Targeted employee retention: Performance-based and job-related differences in reported reasons for staying. Human Resource Management, 48, 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. J., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P., & Woehr, D. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 555–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Eberly, M. (2008). Turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 231–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Inderrieden, E. J. (2005). Shocks as causes of turnover: What they are and how organizations can manage them. Human Resource Management, 44, 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hom, P. W., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012). Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 831–858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. H., & Lemeshow, S. (1999). Applied survival analysis: Regression modeling of time to event data. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A. (1995). Changing nature of work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1332–1356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Judiesch, M. K. (1990). Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackofsky, E. F. (1984). Turnover and job performance: An integrated process model. Academy of Management Review, 9, 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1039–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Livingston, B. A. (2008). Is the gap more than gender? A longitudinal analysis of gender, gender role orientation, and earnings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 994–1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., Treuren, G., & Bordia, P. (2012). Shocks and final straws: Using exit-interview data to examine the unfolding models’ decision paths. Human Resource Management, 51, 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, K., & Rupp, D. E. (2013). High-performer turnover and firm performance: The moderating role of human capital investment and firm reputation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. H., Gerhart, B., Weller, I., & Trevor, C. O. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 651–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (1994). An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Review, 19, 51–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Wise, L., & Fireman, S. (1996). An unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maertz, C. P., & Griffeth, R. W. (2004). Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: A theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30, 667–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltarich, M. A., Nyberg, A. J., & Reilly, T. (2010). A conceptual and empirical analysis of the cognitive ability-voluntary turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1058–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Man, D. C., & Lam, S. S. K. (2003). The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 979–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G. P., Leach, D. J., Clegg, C. W., & McGowan, I. (2014). Collaborative crafting in call centre teams. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 464–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, P. F., Avery, D. R., Tonidandel, S., Morris, M. A., Hernandez, M., & Hebl, M. R. (2007). Racial differences in employee retention: Are diversity climate perceptions the key? Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meitzen, M. E. (1986). Differences in male and female job-quitting behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 4(2), 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 189–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). Re-examining the relationship between age and voluntary turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, A. (2010). Retaining your high performers: Moderators of the performance-job satisfaction-voluntary turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 440–453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, A. J., & Trevor, C. O. (2009). After layoffs, help survivors to be more effective. Harvard Business Review, 87, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, A. A., Bachrach, D. G., & Rapp, T. L. (2013). The influence of time management skill on the curvilinear relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 668–677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31, 977–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. S., Dierdorff, E. C., & Bachrach, D. G. (2013). Boundaries of citizenship behavior: Curvilinearity and context in the citizenship and task performance relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66, 377–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 925–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamin, A., & Hom, P. W. (2005). In search of the elusive u-shaped performance-turnover relationship: Are high performing Swiss bankers more liable to quit? Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1204–1216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, D. P. (1991). Contextual variables in employee performance-turnover relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 966–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. D., Dineen, B. R., Fang, R., & Vellella, R. F. (2009). Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1016–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. D., Park, T.-Y., & Kim, E. (2013). A resource-based perspective on human capital losses, HRM investments, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 572–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicherman, N. (1996). Gender differences in departures from a large firm. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 49(3), 484–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. P., & Griffeth, R. W. (1989). The elusive relationship between perceived employment opportunity and turnover behavior: A methodological or conceptual artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 846–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturman, M. C., Shao, L., & Katz, J. H. (2012). The effect of culture on the curvilinear relationship between performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 46–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturman, M. C., Trevor, C. O., Boudreau, J. W., & Gerhart, B. (2003). Is it worth it to win the talent war? Evaluating the utility of performance-based pay. Personnel Psychology, 56, 997–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relationship perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 558–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevor, C. O., Gerhart, B., & Boudreau, J. W. (1997). Voluntary turnover and job performance: Curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevor, C. O., Reilly, G., & Gerhart, B. (2012). Reconsidering pay dispersion’s effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 585–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbach, T., Fay, D., & Goral, A. (2010). Extending the job design perspective on individual innovation: Exploring the effect of group reflexivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 1053–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Vegt, G., Emans, B., & Van De Vliert, E. (2000). Team members’ affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management, 26, 633–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D., & van Schie, E. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Scotter, J. R. (2000). Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 377–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. R., & Livingstone, L. (1994). Another look at the relationship between performance and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., Nicholas LoBuglio, N., Dutton, J. E., & Berg, J. M. (2013). Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work. Advances in Positive Organizational Psychology, 1, 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, G. B., & Frederiks, E. R. (2011). Cognitive and affective regulation: Scale validation and nomological network analysis. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60, 546–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J., & Lawler, E. J. (2006). Relational cohesion model of organizational commitment. In O. Kyriakidou & M. F. Ozbilgin (Eds.), Relational perspectives in organizational studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zargar, M. S., Vandenberghe, C., Marchand, C., & Ayed, A. B. (2014). Job scope, affective commitment, and turnover: The moderating role of growth need strength. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Bret Becton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Becton, J.B., Carr, J.C., Mossholder, K.W. et al. Differential Effects of Task Performance, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Job Complexity on Voluntary Turnover. J Bus Psychol 32, 495–508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9461-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9461-x

Keywords

Navigation