Humor in Teams: Multilevel Relationships Between Humor Climate, Inclusion, Trust, and Citizenship Behaviors
This study examines the cross-level influence of positive and offensive leader humor climates on employee inclusion and citizenship behaviors, and the moderating effect of trust in such relationships.
We collected data from a sample of 225 respondents nested within 23 teams from a Canadian financial organization. A multilevel confirmatory analysis was used to provide evidence that variables of this study are distinct and a HLM analysis to test the hypotheses.
We find that employees’ perception of inclusion is influenced much more by an offensive humor climate than by a positive one. The results also suggest that the perception of inclusion plays a significant intermediary role in the influence of humor climates on citizenship behavior. Finally, trust in leaders acts as an important contingent condition in the effectiveness of a humor climate.
Use of humor does not always pay. Offensive humor by supervisor is a risky strategy that may undermine the beneficial effects of positive humor climate, increase employee exclusion and weaker individual performance.
Our study shows the utility of using micro- and macro-approaches, and more specifically, the relevance of adopting an integrative multilevel view of the effect of a humor environment in predicting individual inclusion and citizenship behaviors.
KeywordsHumor Inclusion Leadership Trust OCB
The author would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for their financial support and Virginie Francoeur and Xavier Rocheleau-Parent for their helpful research assistance.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bliese, P. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In J. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of “Strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
- Burnham, K., & Anderson, D. (2002). Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Fedor, D. B. (1991). Recipient responses to performance feedback: A proposed model and its implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 9, 73–120.Google Scholar
- Findler, L., Wind, L., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2007). The challenge of workforce management in a global society: Modeling the relationship between diversity, organizational culture, and employee well-being, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Administration in Social Work, 31(3), 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forgas, J. P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 199–267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Hitlan, R. T., Cliffton, R. J., & DeSoto, M. C. (2006). Perceived exclusion in the workplace: The moderating effects of gender on work-related attitudes and psychological health. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 217–236.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. (2007). What’s so friggin ‘funny? Discover magazine. http://discovermagazine.com/2007/brain/laughter
- Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–144). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Lennox-Terrion, J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2002). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55(1), 35–60.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables. Version, 3.Google Scholar
- Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D. C. Health and Com.Google Scholar
- Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Peter, L., & Dana, B. (1982). The laughter prescription. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
- Podsakoff, P. M., Bommer, W. H., Podsakoff, N. P., & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Puhlik-Doris, P. (2004). The humor styles questionnaire: Investigating the role of humor in psychological well-being, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sobel, M. (1982). Asymptotic confidence interval for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Susa, A.M. (2002). Humor type, organizational climate, and outcomes: The shortest distance between an organization’s environment and the bottom line is laughter. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
- Twenge, J. M., Ciarocco, N. J., Cuervo, D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Social exclusion reduces prosocial behavior (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
- Yang, C., Ding, C., & Lo, K. (2015). Ethical leadership and multidimensional organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating effects of self-efficacy, respect, and leader member exchange. Group & Organization Management, 1–32.Google Scholar