Humor in Teams: Multilevel Relationships Between Humor Climate, Inclusion, Trust, and Citizenship Behaviors
This study examines the cross-level influence of positive and offensive leader humor climates on employee inclusion and citizenship behaviors, and the moderating effect of trust in such relationships.
We collected data from a sample of 225 respondents nested within 23 teams from a Canadian financial organization. A multilevel confirmatory analysis was used to provide evidence that variables of this study are distinct and a HLM analysis to test the hypotheses.
We find that employees’ perception of inclusion is influenced much more by an offensive humor climate than by a positive one. The results also suggest that the perception of inclusion plays a significant intermediary role in the influence of humor climates on citizenship behavior. Finally, trust in leaders acts as an important contingent condition in the effectiveness of a humor climate.
Use of humor does not always pay. Offensive humor by supervisor is a risky strategy that may undermine the beneficial effects of positive humor climate, increase employee exclusion and weaker individual performance.
Our study shows the utility of using micro- and macro-approaches, and more specifically, the relevance of adopting an integrative multilevel view of the effect of a humor environment in predicting individual inclusion and citizenship behaviors.
KeywordsHumor Inclusion Leadership Trust OCB
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bliese, P. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In J. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of “Strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
- Burnham, K., & Anderson, D. (2002). Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Fedor, D. B. (1991). Recipient responses to performance feedback: A proposed model and its implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 9, 73–120.Google Scholar
- Findler, L., Wind, L., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2007). The challenge of workforce management in a global society: Modeling the relationship between diversity, organizational culture, and employee well-being, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Administration in Social Work, 31(3), 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Forgas, J. P. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 199–267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N. (2010). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Hitlan, R. T., Cliffton, R. J., & DeSoto, M. C. (2006). Perceived exclusion in the workplace: The moderating effects of gender on work-related attitudes and psychological health. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 217–236.Google Scholar
- Johnson, S. (2007). What’s so friggin ‘funny? Discover magazine. http://discovermagazine.com/2007/brain/laughter
- Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–144). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Lennox-Terrion, J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2002). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55(1), 35–60.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables. Version, 3.Google Scholar
- Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D. C. Health and Com.Google Scholar
- Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Peter, L., & Dana, B. (1982). The laughter prescription. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
- Podsakoff, P. M., Bommer, W. H., Podsakoff, N. P., & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Puhlik-Doris, P. (2004). The humor styles questionnaire: Investigating the role of humor in psychological well-being, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sobel, M. (1982). Asymptotic confidence interval for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Susa, A.M. (2002). Humor type, organizational climate, and outcomes: The shortest distance between an organization’s environment and the bottom line is laughter. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
- Twenge, J. M., Ciarocco, N. J., Cuervo, D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Social exclusion reduces prosocial behavior (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
- Yang, C., Ding, C., & Lo, K. (2015). Ethical leadership and multidimensional organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating effects of self-efficacy, respect, and leader member exchange. Group & Organization Management, 1–32.Google Scholar