Skip to main content
Log in

Distinguishing CEOs from Top Level Management: A Profile Analysis of Individual Differences, Career Paths and Demographics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Identifying the characteristics of chief executive officers (CEOs) has been a longstanding goal in leadership and individual differences research. The purpose of this exploratory study was to consider which individual difference and career path variables differentiate CEOs from other senior managers.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Participants (N = 1152) were UK-based senior managers (n = 1040) and CEOs (n = 112) who completed a self-report measure of the Five Factor Model of personality (NEO-PI-R), a measure of cognitive ability (graduate and management aptitude test), and answered a number of additional questions on their career paths as part of development centres. Analyses comprised inter-individual mean difference tests, intra-individual external profile analysis and logistic regression.

Findings

Results indicated that personality facets of impulsiveness, vulnerability, activity and dutifulness showed the largest mean differences. No significant effects were found for the criterion profile pattern, but significant effects were found for profile level. Of the additional predictors, career path variables were the strongest predictors of CEO status.

Implications

The combination of significant effects across domains of individual differences and career path variables emphasizes the importance of a multivariate approach in the study of leadership, top management teams and career progression.

Originality/Value

The current study combines personality, cognitive ability, demographic and career path variables, and applies intra-individual methodologies to explore the characteristics of the very top level of organisational hierarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1976). An information criterion (AIC). Math Sci, 14, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Personality and Performance, 9, 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckstead, J. W. (2012). Isolating and examining sources of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple linear regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 224–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M. (2009). CEOs. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinkhorn, S. (1985). Graduate and managerial assessment manual and user guide. Dorchester: Dorset Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bono, J. E., Shen, W., & Yoon, D. J. (2014). Personality and leadership: Looking back, looking ahead. In D. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, J. W., Boswell, W. R., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Effects of personality on career success in the United States and Europe. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 53–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulut, O., & Desjardins, C. D. (2013). profileR: Profile analysis of multivariate data in R. R package version 0.2-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=profileR. Accessed 13 July 2015.

  • Cannella, A. A., Park, J. H., & Lee, H. U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 768–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, A. E., Barrick, M. R., & Bradley, B. H. (2014). Personality and leadership composition in top management teams: Implications for organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 67, 351–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, P. R. (1992). Revised NEO-personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossland, C., Zyung, J., Hiller, N., & Hambrick, D. (2013). CEO career variety: Effects on firm-level strategic and social novelty. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 652–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpepper, S. A. (2008). Conducting external profile analysis with multiple regression. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 13(1). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v13n1.pdf.

  • Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). International experience in the executive suite: The path to prosperity? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 515–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M. L., Chang, Y.-F., & Davenport, E. C, Jr. (2014). Modeling configural patterns in latent variable profiles: Association with an endogenous variable. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M. L., & Davenport, E. C, Jr. (2002). Identifying criterion-related patterns of predictor scores using multiple regression. Psychological Methods. Psychological Methods, 7, 468–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, C. D. (2012). profanal: Implements profile analysis described in Davison & Davenport (2002). R package version 1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=profanal. Accessed 13 July 2015.

  • Dilchert, S. (2007). Peaks and valleys: Predicting interests in leadership and managerial positions from personality profiles. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giberson, T. R., Resick, C. J., & Dickson, M. W. (2005). Embedding leader characteristics: An examination of homogeneity of personality and values in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1002–1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, F. E. (2012). rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 3.6-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms. Accessed 13 July 2015.

  • Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., Maldagen-Youngjohn, R., & Lyons, B. D. (2011). Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 347–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 100–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Judge, T. (2013). Personality and leadership. In M. G. Rumsey (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership (p. 37). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2008). Personality testing and industrial–organizational psychology: Reflections, progress, and prospects. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Ilies, R., & Colbert, A. E. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 542–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Klinger, R. L., & Simon, L. S. (2010). Time is on my side: Time, general mental ability, human capital, and extrinsic career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 92–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Rodell, J. B., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Crawford, E. R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 875–925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. N., Klebanov, M. M., & Sorensen, M. (2012). Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? The Journal of Finance, 67, 973–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keselman, H. J., Miller, C. W., & Holland, B. (2011). Many tests of significance: New methods for controlling Type I error. Psychological Methods, 16, 420–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le, K., Donnellan, M. B., & Conger, R. (2014). Personality development at work: Workplace conditions, personality changes, and the corresponsive principle. Journal of Personality, 82, 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, J. T., Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2011). The dependability of the general factor of intelligence: Why small, single-factor models do not adequately represent g. Intelligence, 39, 418–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the big-five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2007). Is managerial level related to personality? British Journal of Management, 18, 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2009). How special are executives? How special should executive selection be? Observations and recommendations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palaiou, K., & Furnham, A. (2014). Are bosses unique? Personality facet differences between CEOs and staff in five work sectors. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 66, 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. S., Smith, D. B., Martorana, P. V., & Owens, P. D. (2003). The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 795–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Priem, R. L., Lyon, D. W., & Dess, G. (1999). Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25, 935–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, J. P., & Shaikh, A. M. (2006). Step-up procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate. Annals of Statistics, 34, 1850–1873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2000). Select on intelligence. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silzer, R., & Jeanneret, R. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: A practice and science in search of common ground. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 270–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., Rogelberg, S. G., Ryan, A. M., Schmitt, N., & Zedeck, S. (2014). Moving the pendulum back to the middle: Reflections on an introduction to the inductive research special issue of the Journal of Business and Psychology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 499–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsborough, D. L., & Sambath, V. (2013). Not like us: An investigation into the personalities of New Zealand CEOs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, S. J. (2012). Individual differences and leadership: Contributions to a third tipping point. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 718–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Mark Davison (Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota) for comments on an early draft of this manuscript, and John Crump from Kaisen Consulting for access to the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Booth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Booth, T., Murray, A.L., Overduin, M. et al. Distinguishing CEOs from Top Level Management: A Profile Analysis of Individual Differences, Career Paths and Demographics. J Bus Psychol 31, 205–216 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9416-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9416-7

Keywords

Navigation