The purpose of this study was to investigate whether men and women differentially prefer hiring gay and lesbian job applicants relative to equally qualified heterosexual job applicants.
Data were collected from two samples of non-student participants. Each participant evaluated the perceived hirability of an ostensibly real job applicant by reviewing the applicant’s resume. In reality, all participants were randomly assigned to evaluate the same fictitious resume that differed only in the gender and sexual orientation of the applicant.
We find that men perceived gay and lesbian job applicants as less hirable, while women perceived gay and lesbian job applicants as more hirable than heterosexual job applicants. Additionally, we show perceptions of hirability are mediated by perceptions of gay and lesbian job applicants’ competence.
These results show that bias against gays and lesbians is much more nuanced than previous work suggests. One implication is that placing more women in selection roles within organizations could be a catalyst for the inclusion of gay and lesbian employees. Additionally, these results could influence when and how gays and lesbians disclose their gay identities at work.
These studies are the first to identify a positive bias in favor of gay and lesbian job applicants. As attitudes toward gays and lesbians become more positive, results like these are important to document as they signal a shift in intergroup relations. These results will also help managers and organizations design selection processes to minimize bias toward applicants.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Badgett, M. V. L. (1996). Employment and sexual orientation: Disclosure and discrimination in the workplace. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 4, 29–52.
Barlett, N. H., Patterson, H. M., VanderLaan, D. P., & Vasey, P. L. (2009). The relation between women’s body esteem and friendships with gay men. Body Image, 6, 235–241.
Baumle, A. K. (2009). The cost of parenthood: Unraveling the effects of sexual orientation and gender on income. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 983–1002.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
Button, S. B. (2001). Organizational efforts to affirm sexual diversity: a cross-level examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 17.
Cohen, T. R., Hall, D. L., & Tuttle, J. (2009). Attitudes toward stereotypical versus counterstereotypical gay men and lesbians. Journal of Sex Research., 46, 1–8.
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1339.
Croteau, J. M. (1996). Research on the work experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual people: An integrative review of methodology and findings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 195–209.
Cunningham, G. B., Sartore, M. L., & McCullough, B. P. (2010). The influence of sexual orientation, applicant gender, and rater gender on ascribed attributions and hiring recommendations of personal trainers. Journal of Sport Management, 24, 400–415.
Davidson, M., & Burke, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Women in management worldwide: Progress and prospects. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.
Ellis, A. L., & Vasseur, R. B. (1993). Prior interpersonal contact with and attitudes towards gays and lesbians in an interviewing context. Journal of Homosexuality, 25, 31–45.
Everly, B. A., & Schwarz, J. L. (2015). Predictors of the adoption of LGBT-friendly HR policies. Human Resource Management, 54, 367–384.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
Frable, D. E. E., Blackstone, T., & Scherbaum, C. (1990). Marginal and mindful: Deviants in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 140–149.
Grigoriou, T. (2004). Friendship between gay men and heterosexual women: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. London: London South Bank University, Families and Social Capital ESRC Research Group.
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cures. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–887.
Hebl, M. R., Foster, J. B., Mannix, L. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Forman and interpersonal discrimination: A formal study of bias toward homosexual applicants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 815–825.
Herek, G. M. (1984). Beyond “homophobia”: A social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 1–21.
Herek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 563–577.
Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.
Herek, G. M. (1991). Stigma, prejudice, and violence against lesbians and gay men. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy (pp. 60–80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Herek, G. M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56, 251–266.
Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239–244.
Horvath, M., & Ryan, A. M. (2003). Antecedents and potential moderators of the relationship between attitudes and hiring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 48, 115–129.
Johnston, D., & Malina, M. A. (2008). Managing sexual orientation diversity: The impact on firm value. Group Organizational Management, 33, 602–625.
Kite, M. E. (1994). When perceptions meet reality: Individual differences in reactions to lesbians and gay men. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on gay and lesbian issues (Vol. 1, pp. 25–43)., Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.
Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 336–353.
LaMar, L. A., & Kite, M. E. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multi-dimensional perspective. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 189–196.
Madon, S. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663–685.
Miller, C. T., & Myers, A. M. (1998). Compensating for prejudice: How heavy-weight people (and others) control outcomes despite prejudice. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 191–218). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Morris, T. G., & Bearden, A. G. (2007). The construction and validation of the homopositivity scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 52, 63–89.
Myers, S. L. (2000). Survey of troops finds antigay bias common in service. The New York Times, March 25, C19.
Newport, F. (2011). For First Time, Majority of Americans Favor Legal Gay Marriage. Gallop. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/first-time-majority-americans-favor-legal-gay-marriage.aspx
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576. U.S. ___ (2015).
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.
Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. (2004). The paradox of the lesbian worker. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 719–735.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2001). Pink Triangles: Antecedents and consequences of workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1244–1261.
Ragins, B. R., Singh, R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2007). Making the invisible visible: Fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1103–1118.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1001–1010.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.
Russell, E. M., DelPriore, D. J., Butterfield, M. E., & Hill, S. E. (2013). Friends with benefits, but without the sex: Straight women and gay men exchange trustworthy mating advice. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 132–147.
Taylor, A. (1983). Conceptions of masculinity and femininity as a basis for stereotypes of male and female homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 9, 37–53.
Taylor, H. (2002). Workplace discrimination against, and jokes about, African Americans, gays, Jews, Muslims, and others. New York: Harris Interactive.
Resumes used in the gay male and heterosexual female conditions in Studies 1 and 2.
About this article
Cite this article
Everly, B.A., Unzueta, M.M. & Shih, M.J. Can Being Gay Provide a Boost in the Hiring Process? Maybe If the Boss is Female. J Bus Psychol 31, 293–306 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9412-y
- Sexual Orientation
- Female Participant
- Heterosexual Woman
- Participant Gender
- Simple Effect Analysis