Skip to main content

Can Being Gay Provide a Boost in the Hiring Process? Maybe If the Boss is Female

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether men and women differentially prefer hiring gay and lesbian job applicants relative to equally qualified heterosexual job applicants.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were collected from two samples of non-student participants. Each participant evaluated the perceived hirability of an ostensibly real job applicant by reviewing the applicant’s resume. In reality, all participants were randomly assigned to evaluate the same fictitious resume that differed only in the gender and sexual orientation of the applicant.

Findings

We find that men perceived gay and lesbian job applicants as less hirable, while women perceived gay and lesbian job applicants as more hirable than heterosexual job applicants. Additionally, we show perceptions of hirability are mediated by perceptions of gay and lesbian job applicants’ competence.

Implications

These results show that bias against gays and lesbians is much more nuanced than previous work suggests. One implication is that placing more women in selection roles within organizations could be a catalyst for the inclusion of gay and lesbian employees. Additionally, these results could influence when and how gays and lesbians disclose their gay identities at work.

Originality/Value

These studies are the first to identify a positive bias in favor of gay and lesbian job applicants. As attitudes toward gays and lesbians become more positive, results like these are important to document as they signal a shift in intergroup relations. These results will also help managers and organizations design selection processes to minimize bias toward applicants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Badgett, M. V. L. (1996). Employment and sexual orientation: Disclosure and discrimination in the workplace. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 4, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barlett, N. H., Patterson, H. M., VanderLaan, D. P., & Vasey, P. L. (2009). The relation between women’s body esteem and friendships with gay men. Body Image, 6, 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumle, A. K. (2009). The cost of parenthood: Unraveling the effects of sexual orientation and gender on income. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 983–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Button, S. B. (2001). Organizational efforts to affirm sexual diversity: a cross-level examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, T. R., Hall, D. L., & Tuttle, J. (2009). Attitudes toward stereotypical versus counterstereotypical gay men and lesbians. Journal of Sex Research., 46, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Croteau, J. M. (1996). Research on the work experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual people: An integrative review of methodology and findings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48, 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham, G. B., Sartore, M. L., & McCullough, B. P. (2010). The influence of sexual orientation, applicant gender, and rater gender on ascribed attributions and hiring recommendations of personal trainers. Journal of Sport Management, 24, 400–415.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson, M., & Burke, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Women in management worldwide: Progress and prospects. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis, A. L., & Vasseur, R. B. (1993). Prior interpersonal contact with and attitudes towards gays and lesbians in an interviewing context. Journal of Homosexuality, 25, 31–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Everly, B. A., & Schwarz, J. L. (2015). Predictors of the adoption of LGBT-friendly HR policies. Human Resource Management, 54, 367–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frable, D. E. E., Blackstone, T., & Scherbaum, C. (1990). Marginal and mindful: Deviants in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 140–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grigoriou, T. (2004). Friendship between gay men and heterosexual women: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. London: London South Bank University, Families and Social Capital ESRC Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cures. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hebl, M. R., Foster, J. B., Mannix, L. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Forman and interpersonal discrimination: A formal study of bias toward homosexual applicants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 815–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Herek, G. M. (1984). Beyond “homophobia”: A social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Herek, G. M. (1991). Stigma, prejudice, and violence against lesbians and gay men. In J. C. Gonsiorek & J. D. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy (pp. 60–80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Herek, G. M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Horvath, M., & Ryan, A. M. (2003). Antecedents and potential moderators of the relationship between attitudes and hiring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 48, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnston, D., & Malina, M. A. (2008). Managing sexual orientation diversity: The impact on firm value. Group Organizational Management, 33, 602–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kite, M. E. (1994). When perceptions meet reality: Individual differences in reactions to lesbians and gay men. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on gay and lesbian issues (Vol. 1, pp. 25–43)., Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. LaMar, L. A., & Kite, M. E. (1998). Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multi-dimensional perspective. The Journal of Sex Research, 35, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Madon, S. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller, C. T., & Myers, A. M. (1998). Compensating for prejudice: How heavy-weight people (and others) control outcomes despite prejudice. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 191–218). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Morris, T. G., & Bearden, A. G. (2007). The construction and validation of the homopositivity scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 52, 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Myers, S. L. (2000). Survey of troops finds antigay bias common in service. The New York Times, March 25, C19.

  35. Newport, F. (2011). For First Time, Majority of Americans Favor Legal Gay Marriage. Gallop. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/first-time-majority-americans-favor-legal-gay-marriage.aspx

  36. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576. U.S. ___ (2015).

  37. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Peplau, L. A., & Fingerhut, A. (2004). The paradox of the lesbian worker. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 719–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2001). Pink Triangles: Antecedents and consequences of workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1244–1261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ragins, B. R., Singh, R., & Cornwell, J. M. (2007). Making the invisible visible: Fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1103–1118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1001–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Russell, E. M., DelPriore, D. J., Butterfield, M. E., & Hill, S. E. (2013). Friends with benefits, but without the sex: Straight women and gay men exchange trustworthy mating advice. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 132–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor, A. (1983). Conceptions of masculinity and femininity as a basis for stereotypes of male and female homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 9, 37–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Taylor, H. (2002). Workplace discrimination against, and jokes about, African Americans, gays, Jews, Muslims, and others. New York: Harris Interactive.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin A. Everly.

Appendix

Appendix

Resumes used in the gay male and heterosexual female conditions in Studies 1 and 2.

figurea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Everly, B.A., Unzueta, M.M. & Shih, M.J. Can Being Gay Provide a Boost in the Hiring Process? Maybe If the Boss is Female. J Bus Psychol 31, 293–306 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9412-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sexual Orientation
  • Female Participant
  • Heterosexual Woman
  • Participant Gender
  • Simple Effect Analysis