The Technology Effect: How Perceptions of Technology Drive Excessive Optimism
- 794 Downloads
We propose that constant exposure to advances in technology has resulted in an implicit association between technology and success that has conditioned decision makers to be overly optimistic about the potential for technology to drive successful outcomes. Three studies examine this phenomenon and explore the boundaries of this “technology effect.”
In Study 1, participants (N = 147) made simulated investment decisions where the information about technology was systematically varied. In Study 2 (N = 143), participants made decisions in a resource dilemma where technology was implicated in determining the amount of a resource available for harvest. Study 3 (N = 53 and N = 60) used two implicit association tests to examine the assumption that people associate technology with success.
Results supported our assumption about an implicit association between technology and success, as well as a “technology effect” bias in decision making. Signals of high performance trigger the effect, and the effect is more likely when the technology invoked is unfamiliar.
Excessive optimism that technology will result in success can have negative consequences. Individual investment decisions, organizational decisions to invest in R&D, and societal decisions to explore energy and climate change solutions might all be impacted by biased beliefs about the promise of technology.
We are the first to systematically examine the optimistic bias in the technology effect, its scope, and boundaries. This research raises decision makers’ awareness and initiates research examining how the abstract notion of technology can influence perceptions of technological advances.
KeywordsTechnology Decision making Optimism Diagnostic cue Resource dilemma Implicit association test
- Borges, B., Goldstein, D. G., Ortmann, A., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). Can ignorance beat the stock market. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristicsthat make us smart (pp. 59–72). New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
- Burrill, S. G. (2002). Biotech 2002: The 16th Annual Report on the Industry. San Francisco: Burrill & Company.Google Scholar
- Burrill, S. G. (2011). Biotech 2011 life sciences: 25 years : Looking back to see ahead. San Francisco: Burrill & Company.Google Scholar
- Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, D. P. (2004). Biotech’s dismal bottom line: More than $40 billion in losses. Wall Street Journal, 20, A1–A8. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB108499868760716023.
- Hossain, T., & Morgan, J. (2006). …plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non) equivalence in field experiments on ebay. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
- Ilgen, D. R. (1986). Laboratory research: A question of when, not if. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 257–267). Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson personality inventory—Revised manual. Port Heron: Sigma Assessment Systems Inc.Google Scholar
- John, L., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2009). The best of strangers: Context dependent willingness to divulge personal information. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1430482. Accessed 1 Jan 2011.
- Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV: What we know (so far) about the method. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 59–102). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts. In D. G. Johnson & J. M. Wetmore (Eds.), Technology and society: Building our sociotechnical future (pp. 107–140). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Pisano, G. P. (2006). Science business: The promise, the reality, and the future of biotech. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Cambridge: Harvard University Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time: The fault of epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 562–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar