Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 23–32 | Cite as

Good Soldier or Good Actor? Supervisor Accuracy in Distinguishing Between Selfless and Self-Serving OCB Motives

  • Magda B. L. DoniaEmail author
  • Gary Johns
  • Usman Raja
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

In line with findings that organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) may be driven by selfless and self-serving motives, we sought to determine supervisor effectiveness in distinguishing good soldiers from good actors.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Employing a sample of 197 supervisor-subordinate dyads, we collected self- and supervisor-reports of employees’ citizenship motives. Dominance analysis was used to determine supervisory accuracy in identifying and distinguishing among subordinates’ motives.

Findings

We found that the relationships between self- and supervisor-reports of corresponding motives were strongest, supporting our hypotheses that supervisors are able to accurately identify their subordinates’ OCB motives and that they are not fooled by good actors.

Implications

Our results address concerns raised in previous research that inaccuracy in supervisor attributions of motives might lead to unfair reward or punishment of their subordinates. In demonstrating their accuracy in identifying their subordinates’ motives, an important implication of our work is that supervisors’ preferences for selfless motives may relate to actual differences in their employees’ contribution to the organization.

Originality/Value

Our study contributes to existing research to more conclusively address the question of supervisors’ bias in their preference for selfless motives. Our results also underscore the importance of accounting for employee motives in research exploring the outcomes of OCBs.

Keywords

Organizational citizenship behaviors Citizenship motives Selfless motives Self-serving motives 

References

  1. Aguinis, H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2014). An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: Improving research quality before data collection. Annual of Organizational Psychology, 1, 569–595.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Atinc, G., Simmering, M. J., & Kroll, M. J. (2012). Control variable use in reporting in macro and micro management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, A. H., & O’Hair, D. (2007). Machiavellians’ motives in organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kizlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?The. Academy of Management Review, 24, 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 542–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., & Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of impression management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowler, M., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 70–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowler, M. & Halbesleben, J. (2008, April).Direct and indirect attribution effects of LMX relationships: Self, leader, and coworker attributions of OCB motives. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Budescu, D. V., & Azen, R. (2004). Beyond global measures of relative importance: some insights from dominance analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butt, A. N., & Choi, J. N. (2006). The effects of cognitive appraisal and emotion on social motive and negotiation behavior: The critical role of agency of negotiator emotion. Human Performance, 19, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butt, A. N., Choi, J. N., & Jaeger, A. (2005). The effects of self-emotion, counterpart emotion, and counterpart behavior on negotiator behavior: A comparison of individual-level and dyad-level dynamics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlson, K. D., & Wu, J. (2012). The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carpenter, N. C., Berry, C. M., & Houston, L. (2014). A meta-analytic comparison of self-reported and other-reported organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 547–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eastman, K. K. (1994). In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1379–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finkelstein, M. A. (2006). Dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior: Motives, motive fulfillment, and role identity. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finkelstein, M. A., & Penner, L. A. (2004). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior: Integrating the functional and role identity approaches. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant, A. M. (2013). Give and take. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  22. Grant, A. M., & Meyer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 900–912.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Halbesleben, J., Bowler, M., Bolino, M., & Turnley, W. (2010). Organizational concern, prosocial values or impression management? How supervisors attribute motives to organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1450–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hui, C., Lam, S. S. K., & Law, K. K. S. (2000). Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 822–828.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, D. E., Erez, A., Kiker, D. S., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2002). Liking and attributions of motives as mediators of the relationships between individuals’ reputations, helpful behaviors, and raters’ reward decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 808–815.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuncel, N. R., & Tellegen, A. (2009). A conceptual and empirical reexamination of the measurement of the social desirability of items: Implications for detecting desirable response style and scale development. Personnel Psychology, 62, 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McAllister, D. J., Kamdar, D., Morrison, E. W., & Turban, D. B. (2007). Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1200–1211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Raja, U., Johns, G., & Bilgrami, S. (2011). Negative consequences of felt violations: The deeper the relationship, the stronger the reaction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raja, U., Johns, G., & Ntalianis, F. (2004). The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306–1314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 22–33.Google Scholar
  36. Snell, R. S., & Wong, Y. L. (2007). Differentiating the good soldiers from the good actors. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 883–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Brock UniversitySt. CatherinesCanada

Personalised recommendations