Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 565–581 | Cite as

Fear of Being Exposed: The Trait-Relatedness of the Impostor Phenomenon and its Relevance in the Work Context

  • Jasmine Vergauwe
  • Bart Wille
  • Marjolein Feys
  • Filip De Fruyt
  • Frederik Anseel
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The impostor phenomenon (IP) refers to the intense feelings of intellectual fraudulence, often experienced by high-achieving individuals. The purpose of this study is threefold: (1) examine the trait-relatedness of the IP; (2) investigate the potential impact of impostor tendencies on relevant work attitudes (i.e., job satisfaction and organizational commitment) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB); and (3) explore whether workplace social support can buffer the potential harmful effects of impostor tendencies.

Design/methodology/approach

Belgian employees (N = 201) from three different sectors participated in a cross-sectional survey study.

Findings

Hierarchical regressions revealed that Big Five personality traits, core self-evaluations, and maladaptive perfectionism explain large proportions of the variance in impostor tendencies (∆R2 = .59). A relative weight analysis indicated self-efficacy as the most important predictor, followed by maladaptive perfectionism and Neuroticism. Further, results showed that employees with stronger impostor tendencies indicate lower levels of job satisfaction and OCB, and higher levels of continuance commitment. However, workplace social support buffered the negative effects of impostor tendencies on job satisfaction and OCB.

Implications

Employees hampered by impostor tendencies could benefit from coaching programs that focus on the enhancement of self-efficacy and the alleviation of maladaptive perfectionistic concerns. Impostor tendencies have an impact on career attitudes and organizational behavior. Extra attention could be devoted to the assessment of this specific trait constellation in selection or development contexts. Interventions designed to increase social support are particularly relevant in this regard.

Originality/value

Despite its relevance for contemporary work settings, the IP has barely been investigated in adult working samples.

Keywords

Impostor phenomenon Personality Job satisfaction Organizational citizenship behavior Organizational commitment Workplace social support 

References

  1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauregard, T. A. (2012). Perfectionism, self-efficacy and OCB: The moderating role of gender. Personnel Review, 41, 590–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard, N. S., Dollinger, S. J., & Ramaniah, N. V. (2002). Applying the big five personality factors to the imposter phenomenon. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78(2), 321–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowling, N. A., & Wang, Q. (2012). The moderating effect of core self-evaluations on the relationships between job attitudes and organisational citizenship behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2011). The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chae, J., Piedmont, R. L., Estadt, B. K., & Wicks, R. J. (1995). Personological evaluation of Clance’s impostor phenomenon scale in a Korean sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 468–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chrisman, S. M., Pieper, W. A., Clance, P. R., Holland, C. L., & Glickauf-Hughes, C. (1995). Validation of the clance impostor phenomenon scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 456–467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clance, P. R. (1985). The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree.Google Scholar
  11. Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The impostor phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15, 241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clance, P. R., & O’Toole, M. A. (1988). The imposter phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women and Therapy, 6(3), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowman, S. E., & Ferrari, J. R. (2002). Am I for real? Predicting impostor tendencies from self-handicapping and affective components. Social Behaviour and Personality, 30, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Clercq, S., & Fontaine, J.R.J. (2007). Extending the Schwartz value theory for assessing supplementary person-organization fit. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
  15. De Pater, I. E., Schinkel, S., & Nijstad, B. A. (2007). Validatie van de Nederlandstalige Core Self-evaluations Vragenlijst. Gedrag en Organisatie, 20, 82–99.Google Scholar
  16. Erdheim, J., Wang, M., & Zickar, M. J. (2006). Linking the Big Five personality constructs to organizational commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 570–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faragher, E. B., Cass, M., & Cooper, C. L. (2005). The relationship between job satisfaction and heath: A meta-analysis. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 105–112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrari, J. R. (2005). Impostor tendencies and academic dishonesty: Do they cheat their way to success? Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. French, B. F., Ullrich-French, S. C., & Follman, D. (2008). The psychometric properties of the Clance Impostor Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1270–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garwick, M. R., Ford, A. C., & Hughes, J. L. (2011). Impostor phenomenon and females’ self-esteem, GPA, and relationship with mother. Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences, 10. http://www.kon.org/urc/v10/garwick.html
  22. Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Hamachek, D. E. (1978). Psychodynamics of normal and neurotic perfectionism. Psychology, 15, 27–33.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, S. E. K., Bahniuk, M. H., Dobos, J., & Rouner, D. (1989). Mentoring and other communication support in the academic setting. Group and Organization Studies, 14, 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoekstra, H. A., Ormel, J., & De Fruyt, F. (2007). Handleiding: NEO persoonlijkheids-vragenlijsten/Manual: NEO personality questionnaires. Amsterdam: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  26. Hollender, M. H. (1978). Perfectionism, a neglected personality trait. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 39, 384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmes, S. W., Kertay, L., Adamson, L. B., Holland, C. L., & Clance, P. R. (1993). Measuring the impostor phenomenon: A comparison of Clance’s IP scale and Harvey’s IP scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 60, 48–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ilkhchi, S. V., Poursharifi, H., & Alilo, M. M. (2011). The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group therapy on self-efficacy and assertiveness among anxious female students of high schools. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2586–2591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-Factor Model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012a). General and specific measures in organizational behavior research: Considerations, examples, and recommendations for researchers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012b). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341–367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.Google Scholar
  35. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. R. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaiser, R. B., & Hogan, J. (2011). Personality, leader behavior, and overdoing it. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63(4), 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kearns, H., Forbes, A., Gardiner, M., & Marshall, K. (2008). When a high distinction isn’t good enough: A review of perfectionism and self-handicapping. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35, 21–36.Google Scholar
  38. Kertay, L., Clance, P.R., & Holland, C.L. (1991). A factor study of the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  39. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2005). The dangers of feeling like a fake. Harvard Business Review, 83, 108–116.Google Scholar
  40. Kittinger, J., Walker, A., Cope, J. G., & Wuensch, K. (2009). The relationship between core self-evaluations and affective commitment. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 11, 68–92.Google Scholar
  41. Leary, M. R., Patton, K. M., Orlando, A. E., & Wagoner Funk, W. (2000). The impostor phenomenon: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies. Journal of Personality, 68, 725–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lemelle, C. J., & Scielzo, S. A. (2012). How you feel about yourself can affect how you feel about your job: A meta-analysis examining the relationship of core self-evaluations and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Diversity, 12(3), 116–133.Google Scholar
  43. Lepine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lo, A., & Abbott, M. J. (2013). Review of the theoretical, empirical, and clinical status of adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism. Behaviour Change, 30, 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maslach, C. (2012). Burnout in the workplace: A global problem in need of solution. International Journal of Psychology, 47(SI), 549–549.Google Scholar
  46. Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McDowell, W. C., Boyd, N. G., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Overreward and the impostor phenomenon. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19, 95–110.Google Scholar
  49. McGregor, L. N., Gee, D. E., & Posey, K. E. (2008). I feel like a fraud and it depresses me: The relation between the imposter phenomenon and depression. Social Behavior and Personality, 36, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Jackson, T. A., McInnis, K. J., Maltin, E. R., & Sheppard, L. (2012). Affective, normative, and continuance commitment levels across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Obschonka, M., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., Silbereisen, R. K., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurial-prone personality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A socioeconomical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 104–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
  57. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Oriel, K., Plane, M. B., & Mundt, M. (2004). Family medicine residents and the impostor phenomenon. Family Medicine, 36, 248–252.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviours and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviours. Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Powell, D. M., & Meyer, J. P. (2004). Side-bet theory and the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., Wrightsman, L. S., & Andrews, F. M. (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  63. Ross, S. R., & Krukowski, R. A. (2003). The impostor phenomenon and maladaptive personality: Type and trait characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ross, S. R., Stewart, J., Mugge, M., & Fultz, B. (2001). The impostor phenomenon, achievement dispositions, and the Five factor Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1347–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyten, P., Duriez, B., & Goossens, L. (2005). Maladaptive perfectionistic self-representations: The mediational link between psychological control and adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sonnak, C., & Towell, T. (2001). The impostor phenomenon in British university students: Relationship between self-esteem, mental health, parental rearing style and socioeconomic status. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 863–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stoeber, J., & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 295–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Stumpf, H., & Parker, W. D. (2000). A hierarchical structural analysis of perfectionism and its relation to other personality characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 837–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stumpp, T., Hülsheger, U. R., Muck, P. M., & Maier, G. W. (2009). Expanding the link between core self-evaluations and affective job attitudes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 148–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 500–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Thompson, T., Davis, H., & Davidson, J. (1998). Attributional and affective responses of imposters to academic success and failure outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thompson, T., Foreman, P., & Martin, F. (2000). Impostor fears and perfectionistic concern over mistakes. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 629–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Towers Watson (2012, July). 2012 Global Workforce Study: Engagement at risk: Driving strong performance in a volatile global environment. Google Scholar
  76. Van Vuuren, M., de Jong, M. D. T., & Seydel, E. R. (2008). Contributions of self and organizational efficacy expectations to commitment. Employee Relations, 30, 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Want, J., & Kleitman, S. (2006). Impostor phenomenon en self-handicapping: Links with parenting styles en self-confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 961–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Watson, J. M. (2012). Educating the disagreeable extravert: Narcissism, the Big Five personality traits, and achievement goal orientation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(1), 76–88.Google Scholar
  79. Whitman, M. V., & Shanine, K. K. (2012). Revisiting the impostor phenomenon: How individuals cope with feelings of being in over their heads. Research in Occupational Stress and Well-Being, 10, 177–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wille, B., & De Fruyt, F. (2014). Fifty shades of personality: Integrating Five-Factor Model bright and dark sides of personality at work. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wille, B., De Fruyt, F., & De Clercq, B. (2013). Expanding and reconceptualizing aberrant personality at work: Validity of Five-Factor Model aberrant personality tendencies to predict career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 66, 173–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Woods, S. A., Lievens, F., De Fruyt, F., & Wille, B. (2013). Personality across working life: The longitudinal and reciprocal influences of personality on work. Journal of Organizational Behavior (IRIOP Special Issue), 34, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jasmine Vergauwe
    • 1
  • Bart Wille
    • 1
  • Marjolein Feys
    • 2
  • Filip De Fruyt
    • 1
  • Frederik Anseel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social PsychologyGhent UniversityGentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Personnel Management, Work and Organizational PsychologyGhent UniversityGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations