Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 473–482 | Cite as

Cross-Lagged Relations Between Work–Family Enrichment, Vigor at Work, and Core Self-evaluations: A Three-Wave Study

  • Ali Moazami-GoodarziEmail author
  • Jari-Erik Nurmi
  • Saija Mauno
  • Johanna Rantanen
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to investigate the cross-lagged relations between core self-evaluations, vigor at work, and work–family enrichment over 3 years.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were obtained from a follow-up study of a sample of Finnish university employees (N = 700).

Findings

The results of structural equation modeling showed that vigor at time 1 positively predicted work–family enrichment at time 2, and that work–family enrichment at time 2 positively predicted vigor at time 3. In addition, core self-evaluations at time 2 positively predicted vigor at time 3. No cross-lagged associations were found between core self-evaluations and work–family enrichment.

Implications

This study showed that there is a bi-directional positive link between vigor at work and work–family enrichment. The findings suggest that organizations will benefit from developing interventions which facilitate resource generation between the workplace and family.

Originality/Value

Only a handful of studies has previously examined the longitudinal relations between core self-evaluations, vigor at work, and work–family enrichment, and this is the first that has been based on more than two data collection waves. Moreover, most of the research on the positive aspects of work–family interaction has so far only been conducted in the United States, with very little data collected from elsewhere in the world.

Keywords

Work–family enrichment Vigor at work Core self-evaluations Longitudinal study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the Academy of Finland (Grant number 138369) and a Grant from Finnish Cultural foundation to the first author.

References

  1. Allis, P., & O’Driscoll, M. (2008). Positive effects of nonwork-to-work facilitation on well-being in work, family and personal domains. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Luthans, F. (2008). Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2007). An organizational and social psychological perspective on burnout and work engagement. In K. Van Den Bos, J. B. De Wit, M. Hewstone, H. A. Schut, & M. S. Stroebe (Eds.), The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications (pp. 227–250). New York: Psychology.Google Scholar
  4. Baral, R., & Bhargava, S. (2011). Predictors of work–family enrichment: Moderating effect of core self-evaluations. Journal of Indian Business Research, 3, 220–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyar, S. L., & Mosley, C. P, Jr. (2007). The relationship between core self-evaluations and work and family satisfaction: The mediating role of work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, A. B., Brown, J. S., Sachs-Ericsson, N., Ashby Plant, E., Thomas Curtis, J., Fredrickson, B. L., et al. (2008). Upward spirals of positive emotion and coping: Replication, extension, and initial exploration of neurochemical substrates. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 360–370.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, M. K., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 131–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casper, W. J., Eby, L. T., Bordeaux, C. L., Lockwood, A., & Lambert, D. (2007). A review of research methods in IO/OB work–family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cinnamon, R. G., & Rich, Y. (2010). Work–family relations: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Culbertson, S. S., Mills, M. J., & Fullagar, C. J. (2012). Work engagement and work-family facilitation: Making homes happier through positive affective spillover. Human Relations, 65, 1155–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. H. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work–family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31, 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Perhoniemi, R. (2011). Enrichment processes and gain spirals at work and at home: A 3-year cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative, and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 337–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Innstrand, S. T. (2009). Work/home conflict and facilitation: COR (e) relations: A longitudinal study on work-home interaction in different occupational groups in Norway. (Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway). Retrieved from http://ntnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:283820/FULLTEXT02.pdf.
  23. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 257–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237–249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Judge, T. A., & Hurst, C. (2007). The benefits and possible costs of positive core self-evaluations: A review and agenda for future research. In D. Nelson & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior (pp. 159–174). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Judge, T. A., & Hurst, C. (2008). How the rich (and happy) get richer (and happier): relationship of core self-evaluations to trajectories in attaining work success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 849–863.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.Google Scholar
  29. Karasek, R. (2011). Demand/Control model: A social, emotional and physiological approach to stress risk and active behavior. In J. M. Stellman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety (Vol. 4). Geneva: International Labor Organization. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/oshenc/part-v/psychosocial-and-organizational-factors/theories-of-job-stress/item/12-psychosocial-factors-stress-and-health. Accessed 21 Dec 2012.
  30. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, J. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement: Empirical study of hotel employees and managers (Doctoral thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas). Retrieved from http://krex.kstate.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2097/13653/JungHoonLee2012.pdf?sequence=3. Accessed 13 Jan 2013.
  32. Lewis, S., Brookes, M., Mark, A., & Etherington, D. (2008). Work engagement, work–family enrichment and gender: A positive approach to quality of working life. Working Paper No. NW4 4BT, Middlesex University Business School, London. Retrieved from http://pre.docdat.com/docs/index-123694.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2013.
  33. Little, L. M., Nelson, D. L., Wallace, J. C., & Johnson, P. D. (2011). Integrating attachment style, vigor at work, and extra-role performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 464–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Llorens, S., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A., & Salanova, M. (2007). Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lu, L. (2011). A Chinese longitudinal study on work/family enrichment. Career Development International, 16, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mäkikangas, A., De Cuyper, N., Mauno, S., & Kinnunen, U. (2013). A longitudinal person-centred view on perceived employability: The role of job insecurity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mauno, S., & Rantanen, M. (2013). Contextual and dispositional coping resources as predictors of work–family conflict and enrichment: Which of these resources or their combinations are the most beneficial? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34, 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mauno, S., Rantanen, J., & Kinnunen, U. (2011). Work-family balance and its correlates among Finnish academic professionals: Profiling the experiences of work-family conflict and enrichment. In IBOP (Eds.), The future of knowledge-intensive service work: Theory and practice of managing human and organizational resources, pp. 319–341. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  40. McNall, L. A., Nicklin, J. M., & Masuda, A. D. (2010). A meta-analytic review of the consequences associated with work–family enrichment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Montgomery, A. J., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Ouden, M. D. (2003). Work-home interference among newspaper managers: Its relationship with burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16, 195–211.Google Scholar
  42. Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. (2012). Don’t leave your heart at home: Gain cycles of positive emotions, resources, and engagement at work. Career Development International, 17, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2006). Personality development in the context of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality. In D. K. Mroczek & T. D. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 11–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Salanova, M., Bakker, A., & Llorens, S. (2006). Flow at work: Evidence for a gain spiral of personal and organizational resources. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scollon, C. N., & Diener, E. (2006). Love, work, and changes in extraversion and neuroticism over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1152–1165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., et al. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sieber, S. (1974). Towards a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39, 567–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sikora, P., Moore, S., Grunberg, L., & Greenberg, E. (2007). Workfamily Conflict: An Exploration of Causal Relationships in a 10-year, 4-wave Panel Study. Working Paper No. PEC2007-0001; Institute of Behavioural Science, Political and Economic Change Program, University of Colorado, Colorado.Google Scholar
  50. Siu, O. L., Lu, J. F., Brough, P., Lu, C. Q., Bakker, A. B., Kalliath, T., et al. (2010). Role resources and work–family enrichment: The role of work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 470–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67, 545–556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Wijhe, C. I., Peeters, M. C., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). To stop or not to stop, that’s the question: About persistence and mood of workaholics and work engaged employees. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 361–372.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Wayne, J. H., Grzywacz, J. G., Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2007). Work-family facilitation: A theoretical explanation and model of primary antecedents and consequences. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009a). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009b). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zapf, D., Knorz, C., & Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, social work environment, and health outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimmerman, K. L., & Hammer, B. L. (2010). Work–family positive spillover: Where have we been and what lies ahead? In J. Houdmont & S. Leka (Eds.), Contemporary occupational health psychology global perspectives on research and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 272–295). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Moazami-Goodarzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jari-Erik Nurmi
    • 1
  • Saija Mauno
    • 1
    • 2
  • Johanna Rantanen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations