Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 249–266 | Cite as

The “New” Dad: Navigating Fathering Identity Within Organizational Contexts

  • Beth Humberd
  • Jamie J. LadgeEmail author
  • Brad Harrington



This study takes an identity lens to explore how men experience fatherhood in the context of their work amid shifting ideologies of fathering.

Methodological Approach

This study uses a qualitative, inductive approach with an interview methodology.


This study finds that men hold multiple images within their fathering identities that reflect a range of meanings spanning from traditional to more involved fathering. Norms and expectations from participants work and home lives invoke these various images of fathering, which create potential tensions in how men see themselves as fathers. While some participants navigate the multiplicity by defending traditional meanings of fathering, most fathers maintained the multiplicity by embracing the synergy or accepting the ambivalence among the images.


As fathers take on more caregiving and other family responsibilities, workplace norms may inhibit the development of a father’s identity, as this study suggests. Fathers respond to potential tensions in ways that do little to alter images of them as “organization men,” and the primary support they receive is through ad hoc and stealth methods. Further, fathers feel constrained in discussing the stress of managing fathering at work. This study emphasizes that organizations and managers must better recognize and appreciate fatherhood as a more serious and time-consuming role than it has been seen to be in the past.


While more attention is being paid to the work–family experiences of men, few studies have considered in-depth how the organizational context shapes the identity dynamics fathers experience. This study offers a more nuanced consideration of the complexities associated with taking on a new identity that has multiple meanings, as a result of different contextual factors and shifting ideologies, and offers important insights into the power of the workplace to shape the content and meanings of individual’s non-work identities.


Fatherhood Identity Work-life Organizational context Qualitative research 



This research was conducted in collaboration with the Center for Work & Family (CWF) at Boston College. The authors would like to personally thank Fred Van Deusen and other staff members at the CWF for their great contributions to this project. We’d also like to thank Jeanne McNett for her support in reviewing our work at various stages along the path to publication. Lastly, we’d like to thank the participants who volunteered their time and were willing to share their experiences with us.


  1. Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28(6), 787–810.Google Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Fugate, M. (2001). Role transitions and the lifespan. In B. E. Ashforth (Ed.), Role transitions in organizational life: An identity based perspective (pp. 225–258). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions at work. Academy of Management Review, 23, 472–491.Google Scholar
  5. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E., & Swanberg, J. E. (1998). The 1997 National study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Botsford Morgan, W., & King, E. B. (2012). Mothers’ psychological contracts: Does supervisor breach explain intention to leave the organization? Human Resource Management, 51(5), 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boushey, H., & O’Leary, A. (2009). The Shriver report: A woman’s nation changes everything. Washington DC: Center for American Progress.Google Scholar
  10. Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Social representational constraints upon identity processes. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 271–284). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Burnett, S. B., Gatrell, C., Cooper, C., & Sparrow, P. (2011). Fatherhood and flexible working: a contradiction in terms? In S. Kaiser, M. J. Ringlstetter, M. Pina e Cunha, & D. R. Eikhof (Eds.), Creating balance?! International perspectives on the work-life integration of professionals (pp. 157–172). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Cabrera, N. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71, 127–136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  14. Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Coltrane, S. (2004). Fathering: Paradoxes, contradictions and dilemmas. In M. Coleman & L. Ganong (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future (pp. 224–243). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, M. (2000). Being the ‘‘go-to guy’’: Fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qualitative Sociology, 23, 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.Google Scholar
  18. Demo, D. H. (1992). The self-concept over time: Research issues and directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doucet, A. (2000). There’s a huge difference between me as a male caregiver and women: Gender, domestic responsibility, and the community as an institutional arena. Community Work and Family, 3(2), 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowd, N. E. (2000). Redefining Fatherhood. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Duveen, G. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In K. Deaux, K. Deaux, & G. Philoge`ne (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 257–270). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2010). An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finn, M., & Henwood, K. (2009). Exploring masculinities within men’s identifactory imaginings of first-time fatherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 547–562.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 645–672). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Galinsky, E., Aumann, K., & Bond, J. T. (2009). Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and at home. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  26. Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerson, K. (1993). No man’s land: Men’s changing commitments to family and work. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Gerson, K. (2009). Changing lives, resistant Institutions: A new generation negotiates gender, work and family change. Sociological Forum, 24(4), 735–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregory, A., & Milner, S. (2011). What is “new” about fatherhood? The social construction of fatherhood in France and the UK. Men & Masculinities, 14(5), 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Griswold, R. (1993). Fathers in America: A history. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Hill, E. J. (2005). Work-family facilitation and conflict: Working fathers and mothers, work-family stressors and support. Journal of Family Issues, 26(6), 793–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. Indiana: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  33. Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Owl Books.Google Scholar
  34. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1031–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ladge, J. J., Clair, J. A., & Greenberg, D. (2012). Cross-domain identity transition during liminal periods: Constructing multiple selves as “professional and mother” during pregnancy. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1449–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ladge, J.J. & Greenberg, D. (forthcoming). Becoming a working mother: Managing identity and efficacy uncertainties during resocialization. Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
  38. LaRossa, R. (1988). Fatherhood and social change. Family Relations, 37, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Locke, K. D. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Loscocco, K., & Spitze, G. (2007). Gender patterns in provider role attitudes and behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 934–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleabilityof the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 858–866.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marsiglio, W., & Roy, K. (2012). Nurturing dads: Social initiatives for contemporary fatherhood. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Mescher, S., Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Representations of work-life balance support. Human Relations, 63(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Milkie, M. A., & Peltola, P. (1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the work-family balancing act. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(2), 476–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, T. (2010). It’s a triangle that’s too difficult to square: Men’s intentions and practices around caring, work, and first-time fatherhood. Fathering, 8(3), 362–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Plantin, L. (2007). Different classes, different fathers?’. Community, Work and Family, 10(1), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pleck, J. (1997). American fathering in historical perspective. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (pp. 83–95). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Pleck, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1997). Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (3rd ed., pp. 33–48). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K., & Kaufmann, J. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramarajan, L., & Reid, E. (2013). Shattering the myth of separate worlds: Negotiating non-work identities at work. Academy of Management Review, 38, 621–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ranson, G. (2001). Men at work: Change-or no change? In the era of the “new father”. Men and Masculinities, 4(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reid, Erin M. (2011). Passing as superman: The ideal worker and men’s professional identities. In L. Toombs (Ed.), Best Paper Proceedings of the Seventy-First Academy of Management. Google Scholar
  55. Rochlen, A. B., McKelley, R. A., & Scaringi, V. (2008). “I’m just providing for my family”: A qualitative study of stay-at-home fathers. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9(4), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rochlen, A. B., McKelley, R. A., & Scaringi, V. (2010). Stay-at-home fathers’ reasons for entering the role and stigma experiences: A preliminary report. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 11(4), 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rothbard, N., & Ramarajan, L. (2009). Checking your identities at the door: Positive relationships between non-work and work identities. In L. M. Roberts & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Exploring positive identities and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 125–148). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  58. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2003). A sociological approach to self and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 128–152). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  60. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Swanberg, J. E., McKechnie, S. P., Ojha, M. U., & James, J. B. (2011). Schedule control, supervisor support and work engagement: A winning combination for workers in hourly jobs? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2011), 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Townsend, N. W. (2002). Package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Turner, R. (1968). The self-conception in social interaction. In C. Gordon & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The Self in Social Interaction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. Wall, G., & Arnold, S. (2007). How involved is involved fathering? An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood. Gender & Society, 21(4), 508–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whyte, W. H. (1956). The organization man. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  66. Williams, J. (2001). Unbending gender: Why work and family conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Williams, J. (2010). Reshaping the work-family debate: Why men and class matter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Winslow, S. (2005). Work-family conflict, gender, and parenthood, 1977–1997. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 727–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beth Humberd
    • 1
  • Jamie J. Ladge
    • 2
    Email author
  • Brad Harrington
    • 3
  1. 1.Robert J. Manning School of BusinessUniversity of MassachusettsLowellUSA
  2. 2.D’Amore-McKim School of BusinessNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.Center for Work & FamilyBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations